npx skills add https://www.modelscope.cn/skills/@mathews-tom/manuscript-review
u9401066/med-paper-assistant
manuscript-review
模擬同行審稿與報告指引合規性檢查框架。 LOAD THIS SKILL WHEN: peer review、同行審查、reviewer、審稿、reporting guidelines、CONSORT、STROBE、PRISMA、CARE、critique、檢查稿件、稿件問題
Installation
$
npx skills add u9401066/med-paper-assistant --skill manuscript-review
Similar popular skills
Related neighbors and high-traction skills in the same topics — useful to compare before installing.
scientific-manuscript-review
Similar name
lyndonkl/claude
Guides systematic multi-pass review and editing of scientific manuscripts (research articles, r…
462 installs
manuscript-review
Similar name
mathews-tom/armory
Pre-publication manuscript audit producing a section-level refactoring report with citation hyg…
172 installs
manuscript-writing-review
Similar name
labarba/sciwrite
Use this skill when asked to review, edit, or improve the writing quality of a scientific or en…
150 installs
manuscript-provenance
Similar name
mathews-tom/armory
Computational provenance audit verifying every number, table, and figure in a manuscript derive…
107 installsAlso in this package
Other skills from u9401066/med-paper-assistant · top by installs.
npx skills add u9401066/med-paper-assistant
More details
Agent compatibility
Declared targets from SKILL.md / docs. Unmarked agents are not listed — the skill may still install via the CLI.
Claude Code
Not declared
Cursor
Not declared
Codex
Not declared
GitHub Copilot
Not declared
Windsurf
Not declared
Gemini CLI
Not declared
Cline
Not declared
OpenCode
Not declared
Also listed on
Alternate registries and mirrors of this skill.
Repository health
Stars
11
License
LICENSE
Default branch
master
Open issues
0
Status
Active
Package contents
Files included with this skill beyond the listing page.
-
skill md
SKILL.md4,011 B -
docs
SUMMARY.md384 B
History
- First seen on skills.sh
- First recorded snapshot · 2 installs
SKILL.md
稿件審查與報告指引技能
LLM 語意理解 > regex 關鍵字匹配。資料用 read_draft MCP tool，審查邏輯由 LLM + domain knowledge。
觸發：審查草稿、reviewer、CONSORT、STROBE、PRISMA、CARE、投稿前檢查
搭配 MCP Tools
| 工具 | 用途 |
|---|---|
read_draft |
必用 — 讀草稿 |
list_drafts |
列出可審查的草稿 |
count_words |
字數統計 |
check_formatting |
期刊格式量化檢查 + 跨文件一致性 |
Framework 1: Peer Review
用 read_draft 取得內容 → 按 4 面向審查 → 輸出結構化報告
審查面向
1. Structure：必要章節齊全、Abstract 結構化、邏輯順序（Major if 缺少/亂序）
2. Methods：
| 項目 | Major/Minor |
|---|---|
| Ethics/IRB statement | Major |
| Statistical methods | Major |
| Sample size justification | Minor |
| Primary outcome definition | Minor |
| Inclusion/exclusion criteria | Minor |
3. Statistics：
| 項目 | Major/Minor |
|---|---|
| Confidence intervals | Major |
| P-value reporting (精確值) | Minor |
| Multiple comparisons correction | Minor |
| Effect size | Minor |
4. Writing：
| 項目 | Major/Minor |
|---|---|
| Limitations section | Major |
| Causal language in observational | Major |
| Word count / Reference density | Minor |
判定
Major ≥3 → 🔴 Major revision required | 1-2 → 🟡 Major revision | 0 → ✅ Minor/Accept
Framework 2: Reporting Guideline Compliance
read_draft → 自動偵測/指定 guideline → 逐項檢查 → 合規報告
Auto-Detection
| 草稿特徵 | 指引 |
|---|---|
| randomized, RCT, blinded, placebo | CONSORT |
| systematic review, meta-analysis | PRISMA |
| case report, case presentation | CARE |
| observational, cohort, case-control | STROBE |
CONSORT (RCT, 21 items)
Title(1), Abstract(2), Intro(3-4: background, objectives), Methods(5-13: design, eligibility, interventions, outcomes, sample size, randomization, allocation concealment, blinding, statistics), Results(14-19: flow, recruitment, baseline, N analysed, outcomes+CI, harms), Discussion(20: interpretation+limitations), Other(21: registration)
STROBE (Observational, 16 items)
Title(1), Intro(2-3), Methods(4-11: design, setting, participants, variables, measurement, bias, sample size, statistics), Results(12-14: participants, descriptive, outcome), Discussion(15: interpretation), Other(16: funding)
PRISMA (SR, 17 items)
Title(1), Abstract(2), Intro(3), Methods(4-11: protocol, eligibility, sources, strategy, selection, extraction, RoB, synthesis), Results(12-15: flow, characteristics, results, heterogeneity), Discussion(16), Other(17: registration)
CARE (Case Report, 13 items)
Title(1), Abstract(2), Intro(3), Patient(4-7: demographics, complaints, history, exam), Clinical(8-10: diagnosis, intervention, follow-up), Discussion(11-12: strengths/limits, rationale), Patient(13: consent)
判定
≥80% → 🟢 Good | 60-80% → 🟡 Needs attention | <60% → 🔴 Significant gaps
使用原則
- 語意理解，非關鍵字匹配（「倫理委員會核准」= ethics approval）
- Major = 可能被 reject，Minor = 改善建議
- 給具體修復建議
- 多檔案支持（Introduction、Methods 可能在不同檔案）