smithery/gptomics

bio-long-read-sequencing-long-read-qc

Assesses Oxford Nanopore and PacBio long-read quality with NanoPlot, cramino, NanoComp, pycoQC/toulligQC, and seqkit, and filters reads with chopper/Filtlong for the downstream goal. Covers why read-only Qscore is an uncalibrated posterior (real accuracy needs a reference BAM), why the sequencing_summary.txt is required for run-health metrics, intent-conditioned filtering (preserve long reads and small replicons for assembly, filter almost nothing for variant calling), the chimera/internal-adap…

Installation

$ npx skills add smithery/gptomics --skill bio-longread-qc

Summary

  • Assesses Oxford Nanopore and PacBio long-read quality with NanoPlot, cramino, NanoComp, pycoQC/toulligQC, and seqkit, and filters reads with chopper/Filtlong for the downstream goal.
  • Covers why read-only Qscore is an uncalibrated posterior (real accuracy needs a reference BAM), why the sequencing_summary.txt is required for run-health metrics, intent-conditioned filtering (preserve long reads and small replicons for assembly, filter almost nothing for variant calling), the chimera/internal-adapter trap that fabricates SVs, and PacBio rq-based HiFi QC.
  • Use when judging a long-read run, computing read N50 or percent identity, filtering reads before assembly or variant calling, comparing barcodes/runs, or reading run-health red flags.

Similar popular skills

Related neighbors and high-traction skills in the same topics — useful to compare before installing.

Also in this package

Other skills from smithery/gptomics · top by installs.

npx skills add smithery/gptomics

Browse all from smithery/gptomics

More details

Agent compatibility

Declared targets from SKILL.md / docs. Unmarked agents are not listed — the skill may still install via the CLI.

Claude Code Not declared
Cursor Not declared
Codex Not declared
GitHub Copilot Not declared
Windsurf Not declared
Gemini CLI Not declared
Cline Not declared
OpenCode Not declared

Package contents

Files included with this skill beyond the listing page.

  • skill md SKILL.md 10,669 B
  • docs SUMMARY.md 294 B

History

  1. First recorded snapshot · 0 installs

SKILL.md

Version Compatibility

Reference examples tested with: NanoPlot 1.42+ (NanoPack2), cramino 0.14+, chopper 0.7+, Filtlong 0.2+, seqkit 2.5+, pycoQC 2.5+.

Before using code patterns, verify installed versions match. If versions differ:

  • CLI: <tool> --version then <tool> --help to confirm flags (chopper/cramino are fast-moving Rust tools)

Inputs that determine what QC is even possible - record them:

  • sequencing_summary.txt is produced by the basecaller (Dorado/Guppy), not the FASTQ. pycoQC/toulligQC REQUIRE it for pore activity, yield-over-time, and translocation speed. FASTQ-only hand-off permanently loses the run-health layer.
  • Percent identity requires a reference BAM (NanoPlot --bam / cramino); it cannot come from FASTQ.

If code throws an error, introspect the installed tool (NanoPlot --help, cramino --help) and adapt the example to the actual API rather than retrying.

Long-Read QC

"Is my long-read run any good?" -> Read length N50 and yield from FASTQ, real percent identity from a reference BAM, run-health from the sequencing_summary, then filter for the downstream goal.

  • CLI: NanoPlot --fastq reads.fq.gz -o qc/ (overview), cramino aln.bam (fast BAM stats + identity), pycoQC -f sequencing_summary.txt -o run.html (run health)

The Single Most Important Modern Insight -- Read-Only Qscore Is a Self-Graded Posterior; Real Accuracy and the Failures That Sink a Run Are Only Visible Against a BAM and the Summary

Three corrections a naive long-read QC misses:

  1. Per-read Qscore is an uncalibrated basecaller posterior, not an empirical error rate. It is the Phred of the mean per-base error probability (NOT the arithmetic mean of Q values), assigned by the basecaller to its own output. ONT's own data: bases labeled Q20 are empirically ~Q12.5 on older chemistries; R10 sup and HiFi are better calibrated but read-only Q still overstates accuracy. Real accuracy is gap-compressed identity from a reference BAM (cramino, NanoPlot --bam). Treat Q thresholds as relative knobs, not accuracy guarantees.
  2. The sequencing_summary.txt is the run-health layer, and it is not in the FASTQ. Pore/channel activity, yield-over-time, translocation speed, and barcode breakdown come from the basecaller's summary TSV. Hand a collaborator only FASTQ and that layer is gone (re-basecalling from POD5 can regenerate it; FASTQ cannot).
  3. The right filter depends on intent, not a fixed cutoff. Assembly wants the long reads (which are the lowest-Q) and small replicons preserved - subsample by quality, never hard-length-cut. Variant calling wants depth - filter almost nothing and let the caller model per-base Q. HiFi is already Q20+ - do not Phred-filter it like noisy CLR.

Tool Roles

Tool Input Reports
NanoPlot FASTQ / BAM / summary length dist, length-vs-quality, yield; --bam adds percent identity
cramino BAM/CRAM fast N50, yield, gap-compressed identity, --phased block N50, --karyotype
NanoComp multiple FASTQ/BAM/summaries compare runs/barcodes (length, quality, identity)
pycoQC / toulligQC sequencing_summary.txt run health: pore activity, mux map, yield/speed over time, barcodes
seqkit stats -a FASTA/FASTQ N50, quartiles, total bases, GC
chopper FASTQ (stdin) filter/trim by mean Q and length
Filtlong FASTQ keep best reads by length x identity; subsample to a target depth

Read N50 = the length where 50% of total bases are in reads at least that long (length-weighted, far above the median); it predicts assembly contiguity. NanoFilt and the rrwick Porechop are deprecated/unmaintained (use chopper and Porechop_ABI).

Intent-Conditioned Filtering Decision Tree

Goal Filter Why
Bacterial / small-genome assembly light Q/length, then subsample by quality to ~50-100x (filtlong --target_bases) a hard 10 kb length cut erases small plasmids; quality-subsampling beats length filtering
Eukaryotic / large-genome assembly minimal; keep the long tail the longest (lowest-Q) reads span repeats; over-filtering loses N50
SV calling light Q only; trim chimeras chimeras fabricate SVs; trimming matters more than Q filtering
SNV / small-variant calling almost nothing (chopper -q 10) callers model per-base Q and want depth
PacBio HiFi rq >= 0.99 only already Q20+; Phred filtering adds nothing
cDNA / direct RNA orient/trim (pychopper), no hard length cut transcript length is biology; a length cut biases the expression matrix

Core Commands

# Overview from FASTQ (length + posterior quality only - not real accuracy)
NanoPlot --fastq reads.fq.gz -o qc_fastq/ --N50
seqkit stats -a reads.fq.gz                     # N50 + quartiles, fast

# Real accuracy: fast BAM stats incl. gap-compressed identity (needs a reference BAM)
cramino aln.bam
NanoPlot --bam aln.bam -o qc_bam/               # percent identity scatter

# Run health (requires the basecaller's summary)
pycoQC -f sequencing_summary.txt -o run_qc.html

# Compare barcodes / runs
NanoComp --bam s1.bam s2.bam s3.bam --names s1 s2 s3 -o compare/

# Filter for VARIANT calling: light quality only
chopper -q 10 -i reads.fq.gz | gzip > q10.fq.gz

# Subsample for ASSEMBLY: by quality to ~100x of a 5 Mb genome (never a hard length cut)
filtlong --target_bases 500000000 reads.fq.gz | gzip > subsampled.fq.gz

Per-Method Failure Modes

Trusting FASTQ Qscore as accuracy

Trigger: judging a run from NanoStat --fastq mean Q. Mechanism: Q is an uncalibrated posterior. Symptom: "Q20 reads" that are ~94% accurate. Fix: align and read gap-compressed identity (cramino / NanoPlot --bam).

QC without the summary

Trigger: only FASTQ/BAM at hand-off. Mechanism: run-health metrics live in sequencing_summary.txt. Symptom: cannot see pore death, mux map, or yield-over-time. Fix: obtain the summary (or re-basecall from POD5 to regenerate it).

Over-filtering erases assembly value

Trigger: a blunt -q 15 or hard 10 kb length cut before assembly. Mechanism: the longest reads are the lowest-Q; small plasmids fall under a length floor. Symptom: worse N50; missing plasmids. Fix: subsample by quality (Filtlong --target_bases), keep the long tail, never length-floor above the smallest replicon.

Chimeras masquerade as SVs

Trigger: undetected internal adapters (two molecules ligated as one read). Mechanism: the read's halves map to different loci. Symptom: phantom translocations/insertions in the SV VCF. Fix: check whether Dorado already trimmed/split; use Porechop_ABI for unknown adapters; suspect a biologically implausible long-read spike.

Re-filtering HiFi like CLR

Trigger: Phred-quality-filtering PacBio HiFi. Mechanism: HiFi is Q20+ consensus already. Symptom: wasted reads, no accuracy gain. Fix: filter on rq >= 0.99 only.

Quantitative Thresholds

Threshold Source Rationale
Q20-labeled bases ~Q12.5 empirically ONT EPI2ME read-only Q overstates accuracy; verify by alignment
Subsample assembly data to ~50-100x Wick 2026 >100x slows assemblers and can propagate systematic errors
Pore occupancy <~70% in hour 1 rarely recovers ONT guidance run-health red flag for early pore death
Translocation ~400 b/s (R10 DNA) ONT chemistry drift off target correlates with falling basecall Q
HiFi rq >= 0.99 (Q20); >= 0.999 for Q30 PacBio CCS the canonical HiFi accuracy filter
-q 10 as a light QC floor convention a relative knob, not a 90%-accuracy guarantee

Common Errors

Error / symptom Cause Solution
NanoPlot gives no percent identity run on FASTQ use --bam (identity needs alignment)
pycoQC errors / empty no sequencing_summary.txt supply the basecaller summary
cramino fails on FASTQ cramino is BAM/CRAM only give it the aligned BAM
Assembly N50 dropped after filtering hard length/quality cut removed long reads subsample by quality instead
Missing small plasmids length floor above the replicon size lower/remove the length floor
Phantom SVs in the VCF chimeric reads trim/split internal adapters

References

  • De Coster W, D'Hert S, Schultz DT, Cruts M, Van Broeckhoven C. 2018. NanoPack: visualizing and processing long-read sequencing data. Bioinformatics 34(15):2666-2669.
  • De Coster W, Rademakers R. 2023. NanoPack2: population-scale evaluation of long-read sequencing data (cramino, chopper). Bioinformatics 39(5):btad311.
  • Leger A, Leonardi T. 2019. pycoQC, interactive quality control for Oxford Nanopore Sequencing. J Open Source Softw 4(34):1236.
  • Steinig E, Coin L. 2022. Nanoq: ultra-fast quality control for nanopore reads. J Open Source Softw 7(69):2991.
  • Bonenfant Q, Noé L, Touzet H. 2023. Porechop_ABI: discovering unknown adapters in Oxford Nanopore sequencing reads. Bioinform Adv 3(1):vbac085.
  • Shen W, Le S, Li Y, Hu F. 2016. SeqKit: a cross-platform and ultrafast toolkit for FASTA/Q file manipulation. PLoS ONE 11(10):e0163962.

Related Skills

  • basecalling - Produces the reads and the sequencing_summary.txt this QC needs
  • long-read-alignment - Produces the BAM required for real percent identity
  • structural-variants - Chimeras flagged here fabricate SVs there
  • medaka-polishing - QC/subsample reads before polishing
  • genome-assembly/long-read-assembly - Subsample by quality before assembling
  • genome-assembly/genome-profiling - K-mer ploidy/size estimate alongside read QC
  • read-qc/quality-reports - General (short-read-oriented) read QC
  • sequence-io/sequence-statistics - FASTA/FASTQ summary statistics