Version Compatibility
Reference examples tested with: flowCore 2.14+, CATALYST 1.26+, ggplot2 3.5+.
Before using code patterns, verify installed versions match. If versions differ:
- R:
packageVersion('<pkg>') then ?function_name to verify parameters
If code throws an error, introspect the installed package and adapt rather than retrying.
Doublet Detection
"Remove doublets from my cytometry data" -> Discriminate single cells from aggregates using pulse geometry (flow) or ion-cloud parameters (CyTOF), before any clustering or quantification.
- R (flow/spectral):
flowCore gate on the FSC-A vs FSC-H diagonal (+ FSC-W/SSC-W)
- R (mass/CyTOF): gate on DNA intercalator + Gaussian/Event_length parameters
The Single Most Important Modern Insight -- Doublets Are Caught by Area-vs-Height Non-Proportionality, and Scatter Gating Is Necessary but Not Sufficient
A doublet has roughly double the pulse AREA of a singlet but NOT double the Height, and a longer Width/transit time - so singlets fall on a tight FSC-A vs FSC-H diagonal and doublets deflect above it. A 1D area histogram therefore does NOT remove doublets; the discriminating signal is the Area-Height relationship (plus Width). This matters because an unremoved doublet of a CD3+ and a CD19+ cell reads as an artifactual CD3+CD19+ "double-positive," and clustering will faithfully (and wrongly) carve it out as a real population. Crucially, scatter gating is necessary but NOT sufficient: heterotypic conjugates (e.g. a CD3+CD14+ T:monocyte) survive standard FSC-A/H gates and present as genuine double-positives whose lineage-marker levels look COMPARABLE to true single-positives - the tell is an ELEVATED shared marker (e.g. CD45) and a high bright-field aspect ratio, so the definitive resolver is imaging flow cytometry, not a lineage-intensity check (Stadinski 2020 Cytometry A 97:1102). On CyTOF there is no scatter at all - doublets are removed by ion-cloud Gaussian parameters and DNA intercalator content (Bagwell 2020 Cytometry A 97:184).
Method Taxonomy
| Method |
Instrument |
Principle |
Caveat |
| FSC-A vs FSC-H |
flow/spectral |
singlets on the A-H diagonal |
the standard; the discriminator is non-proportionality, not area |
| FSC-W / SSC-W |
flow/spectral |
doublets have longer pulse Width |
complementary to A-vs-H |
| DNA intercalator (Ir191/193) |
CyTOF |
doublets show ~2N+ DNA |
also separates cells from beads/debris |
| Gaussian params + Event_length |
CyTOF |
ion-cloud fit residual/length flags fusions |
catches fusions DNA alone misses (Bagwell 2020) |
| imaging cytometry |
imaging flow |
bright-field aspect ratio |
the only clean resolver of heterotypic conjugates |
Note: cytometry doublet removal is GATING-based. DoubletFinder/Scrublet/scDblFinder are scRNA-seq DROPLET methods (they simulate artificial doublets) - limited transfer, because cytometry has direct physical doublet signals.
FSC-A vs FSC-H Singlet Gating (flow/spectral)
Goal: Keep events on the singlet diagonal.
Approach: A polygon along the A=H diagonal (preferred over a rectangle, which keeps off-diagonal doublets); visualize with the gate overlaid.
library(flowCore); library(ggcyto)
# matrix dimnames preserve 'FSC-A'/'FSC-H'; data.frame() would mangle them to FSC.A
singlet <- polygonGate(filterId = 'singlets', .gate = matrix(
c(20000, 10000, 250000, 200000, 250000, 260000, 20000, 40000), ncol = 2, byrow = TRUE,
dimnames = list(NULL, c('FSC-A', 'FSC-H'))))
singlets <- Subset(fs, singlet)
autoplot(fs[[1]], 'FSC-A', 'FSC-H') + ggcyto::geom_gate(singlet)
CyTOF Doublet Removal
Goal: Keep intercalator-positive single ion clouds.
Approach: Gate DNA intercalator (nucleated, ~2N) and Event_length/Gaussian residual; CATALYST exposes these as channels in the SCE.
library(CATALYST)
# prepData moves Time/Event_length to int_colData by default - keep them in the assay with FACS=TRUE
sce <- prepData(fs, panel, md, transform = TRUE, cofactor = 5, FACS = TRUE)
e <- assay(sce, 'exprs')
dna <- e['DNA1', ] # intercalator-positive = nucleated single cells
keep <- dna > quantile(dna, 0.05) & dna < quantile(dna, 0.95)
if ('Event_length' %in% rownames(sce)) # retained by FACS=TRUE (now on the arcsinh scale)
keep <- keep & e['Event_length', ] <= quantile(e['Event_length', ], 0.99) # quantile-relative, so scale is fine
sce_singlets <- sce[, keep]
Per-Method Failure Modes
1D area gate leaves doublets
Trigger: gating only FSC-A. Mechanism: doublets overlap singlets in area. Symptom: double-positive clusters persist. Fix: gate the FSC-A vs FSC-H diagonal (+ Width).
Heterotypic conjugate survives scatter gating
Trigger: a surprising double-positive between two single-positive clusters. Mechanism: T:monocyte conjugate is scatter-normal, lineage markers comparable to singlets. Symptom: "novel" DP population with an elevated shared marker (e.g. CD45). Fix: treat as suspected doublet; check the shared-marker signal; confirm/resolve by imaging flow (bright-field aspect ratio) when load-bearing.
CyTOF "doublet gate" using scatter
Trigger: porting flow logic to CyTOF. Mechanism: no FSC/SSC exists. Symptom: no scatter channels. Fix: use DNA + Gaussian/Event_length.
Quantitative Thresholds
| Threshold |
Source |
Rationale |
| expected doublet rate ~1-5% (PBMC), higher in tissue |
community |
flag samples far above as prep issues - not a removal cutoff |
| Gaussian + DNA gating improves CV (3.45 -> ~2.04) |
Bagwell 2020 Cytometry A 97:184 |
combined DNA + Gaussian over baseline (Gaussian alone ~2.41) |
Note: a fixed "95th-percentile residual" cutoff is arbitrary; prefer a visual diagonal gate or the instrument's Gaussian parameters over an unjustified quantile.
Common Errors
| Error / symptom |
Cause |
Solution |
| double-positive cluster that "shouldn't" exist |
residual heterotypic doublets |
check for an elevated shared marker (CD45); confirm by imaging flow |
| no FSC/SSC channels (CyTOF) |
mass data has no scatter |
use DNA/Gaussian/Event_length |
| over-removal of large cells |
rectangle gate clips real large singlets |
use a diagonal polygon, not a box |
References
- Stadinski 2020 Cytometry A 97(11):1102-1104 — heterotypic doublets survive scatter gating.
- Bagwell 2020 Cytometry A 97(2):184-198 — automated CyTOF cleanup via Gaussian/Event_length.
- Finck 2013 Cytometry A 83(5):483-494 — CyTOF DNA/event parameters in normalization context.
Related Skills
Workflow order (CyTOF): EQ-bead drift normalization (raw, FIRST) -> cytometry-qc -> doublet-detection -> clustering -> CytoNorm cross-batch (LAST)
- cytometry-qc - Run first: flow-rate/signal/margin cleaning
- bead-normalization - CyTOF drift correction after doublet removal
- fcs-handling - Load FCS files
- gating-analysis - Where singlet discrimination sits in the hierarchy
- clustering-phenotyping - Downstream analysis after doublet removal
- single-cell/doublet-detection - Droplet scRNA-seq doublet methods (different principle)