smithery/adaptyvbio

alphafold

Validate protein designs using AlphaFold2 structure prediction. Use this skill when: (1) Validating designed sequences fold correctly, (2) Predicting binder-target complex structures, (3) Calculating confidence metrics (pLDDT, pTM, ipTM), (4) Self-consistency validation of designs, (5) Multi-chain complex prediction with AlphaFold-Multimer. For faster single-chain prediction, use esm. For QC thresholds, use protein-qc.

Installation

$ npx skills add smithery/adaptyvbio --skill alphafold

Similar popular skills

Related neighbors and high-traction skills in the same topics — useful to compare before installing.

Also in this package

Other skills from smithery/adaptyvbio · top by installs.

npx skills add smithery/adaptyvbio

Browse all from smithery/adaptyvbio

More details

Agent compatibility

Declared targets from SKILL.md / docs. Unmarked agents are not listed — the skill may still install via the CLI.

Claude Code Not declared
Cursor Not declared
Codex Not declared
GitHub Copilot Not declared
Windsurf Not declared
Gemini CLI Not declared
Cline Not declared
OpenCode Not declared

Skill metadata

Parsed from SKILL.md frontmatter.

LicenseMIT

Package contents

Files included with this skill beyond the listing page.

  • skill md SKILL.md 4,864 B
  • docs SUMMARY.md 440 B

History

  1. First recorded snapshot · 0 installs

SKILL.md

AlphaFold2 Structure Validation

Prerequisites

Requirement Minimum Recommended
Python 3.8+ 3.10
CUDA 11.0+ 12.0+
GPU VRAM 32GB 40GB (A100)
RAM 32GB 64GB
Disk 100GB 500GB (for databases)

How to run

First time? See [Getting started](../../docs/getting-started.md) to set up Modal and biomodals.

Option 1: Modal (AlphaFold-Multimer)

cd biomodals
modal run modal_alphafold.py \
  --input-fasta sequences.fasta \
  --out-dir output/

GPU: A100 (40GB) | Timeout: 3600s default

Option 2: Local installation

git clone https://github.com/google-deepmind/alphafold.git
cd alphafold

python run_alphafold.py \
  --fasta_paths=query.fasta \
  --output_dir=output/ \
  --model_preset=monomer \
  --max_template_date=2026-01-01

Option 3: ESMFold2 (fast single-sequence)

printf '>protein|A\nMKTAYIAKQRQISFVK...\n' > seq.faa
uv run --with modal modal run modal_esmfold2.py --input-faa seq.faa

Key parameters

Parameter Default Options Description
--model_preset monomer monomer/multimer Model type
--num_recycle 3 1-20 Recycling iterations
--maxtemplatedate - YYYY-MM-DD Template cutoff
--use_templates True True/False Use template search

Output format

output/
├── ranked_0.pdb           # Best model
├── ranked_1.pdb           # Second best
├── ranking_debug.json     # Confidence scores
├── result_model_1.pkl     # Full results
├── msas/                  # MSA files
└── features.pkl           # Input features

Extracting metrics

import pickle

with open('result_model_1.pkl', 'rb') as f:
    result = pickle.load(f)

plddt = result['plddt']
ptm = result['ptm']
iptm = result.get('iptm', None)  # Multimer only
pae = result['predicted_aligned_error']

Sample output

Successful run

$ python run_alphafold.py --fasta_paths complex.fasta --model_preset multimer
[INFO] Running MSA search...
[INFO] Running model 1/5...
[INFO] Running model 5/5...
[INFO] Relaxing structures...

Results:
  ranked_0.pdb:
    pLDDT: 87.3 (mean)
    pTM: 0.78
    ipTM: 0.62
    PAE (interface): 8.5

Saved to output/

What good output looks like:

  • pLDDT: > 85 (mean, on 0-100 scale) or > 0.85 (normalized)
  • pTM: > 0.70
  • ipTM: > 0.50 for complexes
  • PAE_interface: < 10

Decision tree

Should I use AlphaFold?
│
├─ What are you predicting?
│  ├─ Single protein → ESMFold (faster)
│  ├─ Protein-protein complex → AlphaFold/ColabFold ✓
│  ├─ Protein + ligand → Chai or Boltz
│  └─ Batch of sequences → ColabFold ✓
│
├─ What do you need?
│  ├─ Highest accuracy → AlphaFold/ColabFold ✓
│  ├─ Fast screening → ESMFold
│  └─ MSA-free prediction → Chai or ESMFold
│
└─ Which AF2 option?
   ├─ Local installation → Full control, slow setup
   ├─ ColabFold → Easier, MSA server
   └─ Modal → Recommended for batch

Typical performance

Campaign Size Time (A100) Cost (Modal) Notes
100 complexes 1-2h ~$8 With MSA server
500 complexes 5-10h ~$40 Standard campaign
1000 complexes 10-20h ~$80 Large campaign

Per-complex: ~30-60s with MSA server.


Verify

find output -name "ranked_0.pdb" | wc -l  # Should match input count

Troubleshooting

Low pLDDT regions: May indicate disorder or poor design Low ipTM: Interface not confident, check hotspots High PAE off-diagonal: Chains may not interact OOM errors: Use ColabFold with MSA server instead

Error interpretation

Error Cause Fix
RuntimeError: CUDA out of memory Sequence too long Use A100 or split prediction
KeyError: 'iptm' Running monomer on complex Use multimer preset
FileNotFoundError: database Missing MSA databases Use ColabFold MSA server
TimeoutError MSA search slow Reduce num_recycles

Next: protein-qc for filtering and ranking.