plurigrid/asi

able-markets

Skill able-markets

First seen May 14, 2026

Installation

$ npx skills add plurigrid/asi --skill able-markets

Similar popular skills

Related neighbors and high-traction skills in the same topics — useful to compare before installing.

Also in this package

Other skills from plurigrid/asi · top by installs.

npx skills add plurigrid/asi

Browse all from plurigrid/asi

More details

Agent compatibility

Declared targets from SKILL.md / docs. Unmarked agents are not listed — the skill may still install via the CLI.

Claude Code Not declared
Cursor Not declared
Codex Not declared
GitHub Copilot Not declared
Windsurf Not declared
Gemini CLI Not declared
Cline Not declared
OpenCode Not declared

Repository health

Stars 62
License LICENSE
Default branch main
Open issues 3
Status Active

Package contents

Files included with this skill beyond the listing page.

  • skill md SKILL.md 13,488 B
  • docs SUMMARY.md 38 B

History

  1. First seen on skills.sh
  2. First recorded snapshot · 1 installs

SKILL.md

*Able Markets Skill

Trit: 0 (ERGODIC - coordinates market equilibrium) Color: #19A845 (seed=137, index=1) Foundation: Protocol Evolution Markets + *Able Quadrant + WEV

Overview

Prediction markets for protocol proposal outcomes across Swift Evolution, Aptos AIPs, and Scheme SRFIs. Financializes standard possible worlds through the *Able trait taxonomy.

*Able Quadrant Encoding

Trit *Able Trait Market Role Color
-1 Queryable Risk hedgers, validators #9068DA
0 Derangeable Market makers, arbitrageurs #E3EF45
+1 Colorable Speculators, early adopters #C335A8

Derived *Able Traits from Proposals

AIP-137 → PQ-Signable    (#5FE0B8, trit=0)
AIP-129 → Replay-Protectable (#E2F25B, trit=+1)
SRFI-265 → CFG-Composable
SE-0475 → Observable

Active Draft Proposals

Aptos AIPs (High Priority)

AIP Title Status Last-Call *Able Trait
137 Post-Quantum SLH-DSA Draft 02/09/2026 PQ-Signable
129 Orderless Transactions Draft June 2025 Replay-Protectable
113 Domain-based Account Abstraction Active - Derivable

Swift Evolution

SE Title Status *Able Trait
0475 Transactional Observation In Review Observable

Scheme SRFIs

SRFI Title Status *Able Trait
265 CFG Language Draft 2025-10-30 CFG-Composable
263 Prototype Object System Draft 2025-06-09 Prototype-Clonable

Market Mechanics

LMSR Pricing

import math

class AbleMarket:
    """LMSR market for *Able proposal outcomes."""
    
    def __init__(self, proposal_id: str, liquidity: float = 1000.0):
        self.proposal_id = proposal_id
        self.liquidity = liquidity  # b parameter
        self.yes_shares = 0.0
        self.no_shares = 0.0
    
    def cost(self) -> float:
        """Current cost function C(q)."""
        return self.liquidity * math.log(
            math.exp(self.yes_shares / self.liquidity) +
            math.exp(self.no_shares / self.liquidity)
        )
    
    def price_yes(self) -> float:
        """Probability estimate for acceptance."""
        exp_yes = math.exp(self.yes_shares / self.liquidity)
        exp_no = math.exp(self.no_shares / self.liquidity)
        return exp_yes / (exp_yes + exp_no)
    
    def buy_yes(self, amount: float) -> float:
        """Buy YES shares, return cost."""
        old_cost = self.cost()
        self.yes_shares += amount
        return self.cost() - old_cost
    
    def buy_no(self, amount: float) -> float:
        """Buy NO shares, return cost."""
        old_cost = self.cost()
        self.no_shares += amount
        return self.cost() - old_cost

WEV Extraction Formula

WEV(W₀ → W₁) = Σᵢ [V(entityᵢ, W₁) - V(entityᵢ, W₀)] × P(transition)

Where:
- W₀ = pre-proposal world state
- W₁ = post-proposal world state  
- V(entity, W) = value of entity in world W
- P(transition) = market-implied probability

Example: AIP-137 WEV Calculation

def calculate_aip137_wev():
    accounts_at_risk = 10_000_000      # Ed25519 accounts
    avg_value_apt = 100                 # Average APT per account
    crqc_probability = 0.15             # Market consensus
    value_at_risk_ratio = 0.001         # Fraction lost to quantum attack
    
    wev = accounts_at_risk * avg_value_apt * crqc_probability * value_at_risk_ratio
    return wev  # ~150,000 APT

Oracle Resolution

GitHub Status Polling

interface ProposalOracle {
  ecosystem: 'aptos' | 'swift' | 'srfi';
  
  async pollStatus(proposalId: string): Promise<{
    status: 'draft' | 'review' | 'accepted' | 'rejected';
    lastUpdated: Date;
    sourceHash: string;
  }>;
  
  async submitAttestation(
    proposalId: string,
    outcome: boolean,
    proof: string
  ): Promise<void>;
}

// Aptos AIP oracle
const aipOracle: ProposalOracle = {
  ecosystem: 'aptos',
  
  async pollStatus(aipNumber: string) {
    const url = `https://api.github.com/repos/aptos-foundation/AIPs/contents/aips/aip-${aipNumber}.md`;
    const response = await fetch(url);
    const content = atob((await response.json()).content);
    
    const statusMatch = content.match(/Status:\s*(\w+)/i);
    return {
      status: statusMatch?.[1].toLowerCase(),
      lastUpdated: new Date(),
      sourceHash: sha256(content)
    };
  }
};

Multi-Sig Resolution (Move)

module able_markets::oracle {
    use std::vector;
    
    struct OracleConfig has key {
        signers: vector<address>,
        threshold: u64,  // e.g., 3-of-5
    }
    
    struct Attestation has store {
        proposal_id: vector<u8>,
        outcome: bool,
        source_hash: vector<u8>,
        attester: address,
    }
    
    public fun resolve(
        config: &OracleConfig,
        attestations: &vector<Attestation>,
        proposal_id: vector<u8>
    ): bool {
        let matching = count_matching(attestations, &proposal_id);
        assert!(matching >= config.threshold, E_INSUFFICIENT_ATTESTATIONS);
        
        // Majority outcome wins
        let yes_count = count_outcome(attestations, &proposal_id, true);
        yes_count > matching / 2
    }
}

self→Self Autopoietic Loop

The *Able pattern exhibits autopoiesis:

self (proposal instance)
    │
    ├──produces──► Self (protocol trait type)
    │                    │
    │                    ▼
    │              Self ──reconstitutes──► self (new proposals extending it)
    │                                           │
    └───────────────────────────────────────────┘

Market Dynamics Map

Phase self Self Market State
Draft AIP-137 text Signable concept Initial liquidity
Review Community feedback Refinements Price discovery
Accept Merged code PQ-Signable concrete Resolution
Deploy Mainnet accounts All Signable instances WEV extraction

Cross-Ecosystem Arbitrage

def cross_ecosystem_signal(swift_price: float, aptos_price: float) -> str:
    """
    If Swift adopts a pattern, Aptos often follows.
    Arbitrage the information asymmetry.
    """
    if swift_price > 0.7 and aptos_price < 0.4:
        return "BUY Aptos analog - Swift leading indicator"
    elif aptos_price > 0.8 and swift_price < 0.3:
        return "BUY Swift analog - Aptos leading indicator"
    else:
        return "No arbitrage opportunity"

GF(3) Market Conservation

Long (+1) + Market Maker (0) + Short (-1) = 0

For every bullish bet, there's a bearish counterparty.
The market maker provides liquidity but takes no directional risk.
Value is conserved across the market.

DuckDB Schema

CREATE TABLE able_proposals (
    proposal_id VARCHAR PRIMARY KEY,
    ecosystem VARCHAR,          -- 'aptos', 'swift', 'srfi'
    title VARCHAR,
    status VARCHAR,             -- 'draft', 'review', 'accepted', 'rejected'
    able_trait VARCHAR,         -- '*Able trait name
    trit INT,                   -- -1, 0, +1
    color VARCHAR,              -- Hex color from Gay.jl
    last_call_date DATE,
    created_at TIMESTAMP,
    updated_at TIMESTAMP
);

CREATE TABLE market_state (
    proposal_id VARCHAR REFERENCES able_proposals(proposal_id),
    yes_shares FLOAT,
    no_shares FLOAT,
    liquidity FLOAT,
    implied_probability FLOAT,
    total_volume FLOAT,
    last_trade_at TIMESTAMP
);

CREATE TABLE attestations (
    attestation_id VARCHAR PRIMARY KEY,
    proposal_id VARCHAR,
    outcome BOOLEAN,
    attester VARCHAR,
    source_hash VARCHAR,
    created_at TIMESTAMP
);

-- Query: Find arbitrage opportunities
SELECT 
    a.proposal_id,
    a.ecosystem,
    m.implied_probability,
    a.able_trait,
    CASE 
        WHEN m.implied_probability < 0.3 AND a.status = 'review' 
        THEN 'UNDERPRICED'
        WHEN m.implied_probability > 0.8 AND a.status = 'draft'
        THEN 'OVERPRICED'
        ELSE 'FAIR'
    END as signal
FROM able_proposals a
JOIN market_state m ON a.proposal_id = m.proposal_id
WHERE a.status IN ('draft', 'review');

Canonical Triads

Queryable (-1) ⊗ Derangeable (0) ⊗ Replay-Protectable (+1) = 0 ✓
bisimulation-game (-1) ⊗ able-markets (0) ⊗ gay-mcp (+1) = 0 ✓

Asymmetric Bets: High Impact, Low Probability

The market systematically underprices low-probability, high-impact proposals.

Top Asymmetric Opportunities

Proposal Prob WEV Asymmetric Score Why Low Prob
AIP-120 (Trading Engine) 25% 36.5M APT 109.5M Massive engineering; DEX competition
AIP-119 (Reduce Staking) 15% 5.5M APT 31.2M Validators oppose; reduces income
AIP-130 (Signed Integers) 65% 50M APT 26.9M Compiler changes; testing burden
AIP-125 (Scheduled Txs) 40% 10M APT 15.0M Privacy concerns; complexity

Asymmetric Score Formula

AsymScore = WEV × (1 - P) / P

High score = high impact × low probability

Half-Kelly Portfolio (1000 APT)

AIP-130 (Signed Int):  125 APT (12.5%)  - Highest E[V]
AIP-125 (Scheduled):    50 APT (5.0%)   - DeFi automation
SE-0495 (@cdecl):      125 APT (12.5%)  - Swift systems
SRFI-265 (CFG):        125 APT (12.5%)  - Parser ecosystem
Cash reserve:          487 APT (48.8%)  - Dry powder

Open Games Formalization

LMSR markets are formalized as compositional open games with Para/Optic structure:

        ┌───────────────┐
  State─│               │─New State    (forward: play)
        │  LMSR Market  │
Utility←│               │←Outcome      (backward: coplay)
        └───────────────┘

Game Composition

;; Sequential: Markets → Arbitrage layer
(sequential-compose markets arbitrage)

;; Parallel: 3 ecosystem markets running concurrently
(parallel-compose
  (parallel-compose aptos-market swift-market)
  scheme-market)

GF(3) Game Classification

Trit Game Role Examples
-1 Validator Equilibrium checker, auditor
0 Coordinator Market maker, arbitrageur
+1 Generator Trader, liquidity provider
Validator (-1) + Arbitrageur (0) + Trader (+1) = 0 ✓

Nash Equilibrium as Fixed Point

((:equilibrium market) state true-probability)
;; => true when market-price ≈ true-probability

Cross-Ecosystem Arbitrage Game

(defn arbitrage-game [market-a market-b correlation]
  ;; Play: Identify mispricing via correlation
  ;; Coplay: Profit from correlated resolution
  ;; Equilibrium: No-arb when prices reflect correlation
  ...)

Run simulation:

bb scripts/open_game.clj simulate
bb scripts/open_game.clj classify

See Also

  • open-games - Compositional game theory framework
  • protocol-evolution-markets - Foundation skill for this
  • world-extractable-value - WEV calculation framework
  • gay-mcp - Deterministic color generation
  • aptos-society - On-chain WEV implementation
  • multiversal-finance - Multiverse trading framework

WEV Derivational Positions

Proposals map to 5 derivational positions from the Unworld model:

Position Seed Trits Color SICP WEV Source
FIBRED d16bb89f (0,1,-1) #19F473 procedures bridge creation
SHEAF 9c872538 (0,1,-1) #1CF66E state time windows (decays)
DECOMP 7a1cdf2e (-1,1,0) #D704A5 data bag membership
REWRITE fe59de39 (-1,-1,-1) #7319F4 metalinguistic DPO rules
AGENTS 8ac473c8 (-1,0,1) #BE01C1 machines routing success

GF(3) Conservation: Sum of all trits = -3 ≡ 0 (mod 3) ✓

Proposal → Position Mapping

{:aip-137  {:position :sheaf   :decay true}   ;; PQ-Signable
 :aip-120  {:position :rewrite :decay false}  ;; CLOB-Native
 :aip-130  {:position :fibred  :decay false}  ;; Negatable
 :srfi-265 {:position :rewrite :decay false}} ;; CFG-Composable

Kelly Betting with Lazy Knowledge

Front-run information asymmetry by betting on intermediate milestones:

Strategy Odds Move Edge Half-Kelly Direction
selffundingbounty 33%→70% 37% 275 APT YES
earlychampionsignal 33%→60% 27% 225 APT YES
boundedprogressdca 33%→55% 22% 175 APT HEDGE
antihydra_hedge 67%→85% 18% 125 APT NO

Expected ROI: 104% on 800 APT allocated

Usage

# Poll current proposal statuses
bb poll.clj poll

# Calculate WEV for a proposal
bb poll.clj wev AIP-137 0.65

# Run market simulation
bb poll.clj simulate

# Open Games formalization
bb scripts/open_game.clj simulate

# WEV derivational positions
bb scripts/wev_positions.clj positions
bb scripts/wev_positions.clj kelly
bb scripts/wev_positions.clj wev AIP-137

# Asymmetric bets analysis
bb scripts/asymmetric_bets.clj

Para(Optic) atlas

Part of: para-mensch-commons.