Ship a Change

Implement end to end — code it, review it, ship it. Implementation runs in the current session; review always delegates to fresh context and deepens only when risk justifies it.

Input

Same as forge-implement ($ARGUMENTS): Issue number/URL, plan file path, or free-text. Optional: -- <additional context>.

Unattended mode: --unattended skips plan approval and auto-triages findings by severity.

Process

Step 1: Implement

Execute the full [forge-implement](../forge-implement/SKILL.md) process with one modification: do not produce implement's summary — the review below informs the single final report.

Step 2: Review (delegate)

Follow the [review-delegation](../_shared/review-delegation.md) process: collect the diff from the implementation, use one fresh-context review pass by default (this session authored the diff, so the inline tiny-diff path never applies), add a second pass only when risk justifies it, and aggregate findings.

Inputs provided to sub-agent: the branch diff, changed file list, and project conventions per review-delegation. Expected output: Deduplicated findings grouped by file with severity tags (P0/P1/P2).

Step 3: Triage Findings

In attended mode (default): present each finding to the user with a recommendation, biased hard toward fix now — defer only changes that materially expand PR scope or are truly out of scope.

In unattended mode: auto-triage by severity plus scope from the [review rubric](../_shared/review-rubric.md): fix P0–P2 in-scope findings now; defer P1–P2 items that are truly out of scope or materially larger; ignore P3.

Fixed findings are committed; deferred items become Issues — see [issue-operations](../_shared/issue-operations.md).

Step 4: Summarize

Report implementation and review results together.

Output Format

## Ship Summary

**PR:** #<number> — <title>
**Branch:** <branch-name>

### Implementation
- <N> commits, <M> files changed
- Tests: <added/modified/none>
- Docs: <updated/none>

### Review Findings
- Fixed in PR: <list or "none">
- Deferred: #<issue> — <title> (or "none")

### Quality Gates
- Lint: ✓/✗
- Format: ✓/✗
- Types: ✓/✗
- Tests: ✓/✗
- Coverage: ✓/✗/not configured

Guidelines

• Even tiny diffs delegate here — this session authored the changes, so inline review would be self-review
• Don't skip the review — even if implementation felt clean
• Bias toward fixing in the same PR — unless a finding is truly larger or out of scope

Related Skills

Components: Composes forge-implement and the fresh-context review flow shared with forge-reflect (_shared/review-delegation.md). After peer review: Use forge-address-pr-feedback to address reviewer comments.

Example Usage

/forge-ship 42
/forge-ship 42 -- keep the diff minimal
/forge-ship docs/roadmap.md
/forge-ship --unattended 42