mgratzer/forge

forge-create-issue

Collaboratively plan and create well-structured Issues through interactive discussion (GitHub, markdown plan/ folder, or other providers).

First seen Feb 9, 2026

Installation

$ npx skills add mgratzer/forge --skill forge-create-issue

Summary

  • Collaboratively plan and create well-structured Issues through interactive discussion (GitHub, markdown plan/ folder, or other providers).
  • Use when the user wants to create an Issue, report a bug, or scope out work that is already understood — use forge-shape first when the idea is still vague.

Similar popular skills

Related neighbors and high-traction skills in the same topics — useful to compare before installing.

Also in this package

Other skills from mgratzer/forge · top by installs.

npx skills add mgratzer/forge

Browse all from mgratzer/forge

More details

Agent compatibility

Declared targets from SKILL.md / docs. Unmarked agents are not listed — the skill may still install via the CLI.

Claude Code Not declared
Cursor Not declared
Codex Not declared
GitHub Copilot Not declared
Windsurf Not declared
Gemini CLI Not declared
Cline Not declared
OpenCode Not declared

Repository health

Stars 65
Default branch main
Open issues 9
Status Active

Skill metadata

Parsed from SKILL.md frontmatter.

Allowed toolsRead, Edit, Write, Bash, Grep, Glob, WebSearch, AskUserQuestion

Package contents

Files included with this skill beyond the listing page.

  • skill md SKILL.md 4,486 B
  • docs SUMMARY.md 323 B

History

  1. First seen on skills.sh
  2. First recorded snapshot · 35 installs

SKILL.md

Create Issue

Collaboratively plan and create well-structured Issues through interactive discussion. The Issue is created in the project's Issue tracker — see [issue-operations](../_shared/issue-operations.md) for provider detection.

Input

The Issue idea or problem description: $ARGUMENTS

Optional: -- <additional context> for execution guidance.

If no argument is provided, ask the user what they'd like to create an Issue for.

Process

Step 1: Understand and Clarify

Parse the user's input, then use AskUserQuestion to gather:

  • Problem context — what triggered this, who's affected, current vs desired behavior
  • Success criteria — how will we know this is done
  • Constraints — technical limitations, dependencies

Step 2: Research the Codebase

Before proposing solutions, explore relevant code:

  • Find related existing implementations and patterns
  • Identify integration points and potential reuse
  • Look for similar past implementations

Verify external dependencies are accessible if relevant — flag broken ones before proceeding.

Step 3: Present Alternative Approaches

Skip this step if the input already contains a chosen approach with rationale — the decision was already made through deliberate analysis. Proceed directly to Step 4.

Otherwise, present the structurally distinct approaches you found — usually two to four — rather than a single recommendation; the choice belongs to the user.

For each approach:

  • One-line summary
  • How it works (brief)
  • Pros and cons
  • Relative complexity (Low / Medium / High)
  • Key files affected

Let the user choose or combine approaches via AskUserQuestion.

Step 4: Assess Scope

Evaluate if this should be one Issue or multiple.

Split when: distinct deliverables, different codebase areas, parallelizable work, or effort exceeds 1-2 days.

Keep together when: tightly coupled changes or splitting adds coordination overhead.

When splitting, slice vertically — each Issue is a thin end-to-end path (see [vertical-slicing](../_shared/vertical-slicing.md)). Classify each as AFK or HITL (see [afk-vs-hitl.md](references/afk-vs-hitl.md)). Order by dependency.

If splitting makes sense, offer: single Issue, multiple linked Issues, or epic with sub-issues.

Step 5: Draft the Issue

Title: Use conventional commit format — <type>(<scope>): <description>

Labels: Discover what labels exist before applying any — see [issue-operations](../_shared/issue-operations.md). Apply at least one type label and relevant area labels.

Body structure:

## Summary
[1-2 sentences]

**Execution mode:** [AFK | HITL] <!-- markdown provider: use the `mode` frontmatter field instead -->

## Problem / Motivation
[Why this needs to exist]

## Proposed Solution
[Chosen approach with implementation details]

### Alternatives Considered
[Other approaches and why they weren't chosen]

### Implementation Constraints
[When applicable: preferred libraries, config locations, patterns to follow, external dependencies]

## Acceptance Criteria
- [ ] [Specific, testable criteria]
- [ ] Tests added/updated
- [ ] Documentation updated (if applicable)

Step 6: Review and Create

Present the draft to the user and iterate until satisfied (use AskUserQuestion for approve/revise decisions). Then create the Issue using the project's Issue tracker — see [issue-operations](../_shared/issue-operations.md) for provider-specific mechanics, including epics with sub-issues.

Share the Issue reference. Suggest using forge-implement to start implementation.

Guidelines

  • Be curious — challenge assumptions, ask "why" and "what if"
  • Don't over-specify — leave room for implementer judgment
  • No time estimates

Related Skills

Next step: Use forge-implement to implement the Issue.

Example Usage

/forge-create-issue add dark mode support
/forge-create-issue add dark mode support -- keep it to a single Issue
/forge-create-issue