jsmastery-pro/pilot · Archived

test

Run /test to write a test suite for code you just built or changed — after implementing a feature, route, or fix.

First seen Jul 6, 2026

Installation

$ npx skills add jsmastery-pro/pilot --skill test

Summary

  • Run /test to write a test suite for code you just built or changed — after implementing a feature, route, or fix.
  • Targets uncommitted changes automatically, reads test-preferences.json for your framework (asks and saves it if absent), and picks the right strategy per file: happy path, edge cases, error states, accessibility.

Stronger alternatives

This repository is archived — consider an actively maintained alternative.

Similar popular skills

Related neighbors and high-traction skills in the same topics — useful to compare before installing.

Also in this package

Other skills from jsmastery-pro/pilot · top by installs.

npx skills add jsmastery-pro/pilot

Browse all from jsmastery-pro/pilot

More details

Agent compatibility

Declared targets from SKILL.md / docs. Unmarked agents are not listed — the skill may still install via the CLI.

Claude Code Declared
Cursor Not declared
Codex Not declared
GitHub Copilot Not declared
Windsurf Not declared
Gemini CLI Not declared
Cline Not declared
OpenCode Not declared

Repository health

Stars 7
License LICENSE
Default branch main
Open issues 0
Status Archived

Skill metadata

Parsed from SKILL.md frontmatter.

Allowed toolsBash, Read, Grep, Glob, Write, Edit, Task, AskUserQuestion
Declared agents claude-code

Package contents

Files included with this skill beyond the listing page.

  • skill md SKILL.md 16,605 B
  • docs SUMMARY.md 340 B

History

  1. First seen on skills.sh
  2. First recorded snapshot · 19 installs

SKILL.md

Output style (plain words, no dashes)

Write everything this skill produces (files, reports, every message shown to the engineer) in plain simple language; keep technical terms that carry real meaning but explain each in plain words. No dashes of any kind (em dash, en dash, or hyphen as punctuation); use short sentences, commas, or parentheses instead.

What this skill does

Role: a senior test engineer writing the suite the code deserves, no more, no less. Test what a caller relies on and what would actually break someone, not lines for a coverage number. Pick a strategy per file by reading what the thing is. Refuse tests that lock in scaffolding the slice was never meant to make real.

Target: the code changed in this branch but not yet committed. Each changed file is classified (pure logic, component, API route, page/flow) and tested with the right strategy; tests verify real behavior and catch regressions, not coverage farming. The main thread writes the tests itself (a read-only scout may do the heavy file reading for a large set); with a governing ADR, tests trace to its acceptance criteria (Steps 7 and 8).

Does not write application code. Does not update AGENTS.md/CLAUDE.md context files (/sync owns that).

Asks vs acts

  • Acts without asking when test-preferences.json exists, the tool is installed, and uncommitted source files exist: straight to writing.
  • Always asks one thing every run, even with prefs: run the suite after writing, or hand back manual instructions (Step 7.5). Per-run choice, never saved.
  • Otherwise asks only when: no test-preferences.json (framework; E2E addon only if pages/flows changed); a chosen tool is not installed (confirm first); no uncommitted changes (Step 3); >15 files (Step 1b).
  • No scope question. The git working tree defines the scope.

Artifact ownership

  • Test files (.test.ts, .spec.ts, test.py, test.go, etc.) — created by this skill
  • test-preferences.json at the project root — created and maintained by this skill

Portability (any OS, any agent)

Any Agent Skills client on macOS, Linux, or Windows:

  • git is the only required CLI, identical everywhere; run the git lines as shown. Other shell snippets are POSIX reference, not literal scripts: do not assume find, grep, sed, cat, test/[ ], xargs, mkdir -p, or node -e exist. Use your agent's cross-platform file tools (read, search/glob, write) and apply branching logic yourself, not via shell if/variables/redirects.
  • Bundled files: referenced relative to this skill's folder. The main thread resolves the folder to an absolute path and reads the bundled files itself at write time (Step 8): agent-prompt.md and writing-guide.md.
  • No interactive-question support? Ask any multiple-choice question as plain text with the same options.

In the Ask blocks below, each option is "label": "description"; render them through your agent's picker (AskUserQuestion on Claude Code) or as plain text.

Execution

Pre-flight (main thread)

1. Determine scope from git (do this first — if empty, no point asking anything)

Changed-but-uncommitted files (cross-platform git):

  • Tracked (staged + unstaged), excluding deletions: git diff --name-only --diff-filter=ACMR HEAD
  • Untracked, non-ignored: git ls-files --others --exclude-standard
  • No commits yet (git diff HEAD errors): use git diff --name-only --diff-filter=ACMR --cached.

Combine, de-duplicate, filter out non-testable files:

  • Test files: .test., .spec., test.py, test.go, anything under tests/, e2e/, tests/, cypress/
  • Config: .config., .rc, tsconfig, *.json (except where logic lives in JSON), Dockerfile, CI yaml
  • Lock files, .lock, generated/build output (dist/, build/, .next/, coverage/)
  • Styling: .css, .scss, .module.css; type-only declarations: .d.ts
  • Docs and markdown, ADRs, design.md, test-preferences.json

The remainder is the scope. Empty: go to Step 3. Otherwise continue.

1b. Classify each scoped file

Classify from path and filename alone, cheaply; if genuinely ambiguous, tag logic and re-tag when you read the file at write time. Record each file's class for the write step.

Signals in path / filename Class Test strategy
.tsx/.jsx/.vue/.svelte not under a route/page path component Component test (render + interact + assert DOM/ARIA)
app/**/page.*, pages/** (not pages/api), Screen., View. page/flow E2E candidate + component test of pieces
app/**/route.*, pages/api/**, .controller., .handler., .resolver., actions.* api/server Integration test (call handler, mock at boundary)
Plain .ts/.js/.py/.go/.rs — utils, hooks, services, domain logic logic Unit test (inputs → outputs, edge cases, errors)
cli.*, bin/**, .command., cmd/** cli Integration test invoking the command

E2E_RELEVANT = yes if any file is page/flow; otherwise no.

Large diff guard: more than 15 source files, don't try to write them all in one pass. Prioritise by class (logic and api/server first, most risk, cheapest to test well) and ask:

Ask — "<N> changed files is a lot for one pass. How should I focus?"  (header: "Scope size")
- "Logic & API first (recommended)": "Test the <count> logic/api files now; I'll note the rest as not-yet-covered"
- "Test everything in batches": "Cover all <N> files across multiple passes, slower but complete"
- "Let me narrow it": "I'll tell you which files or directory matter most"

Monorepo resolution: find each scoped file's nearest enclosing package.json (walk up). Different roots: group by root (own framework, package manager, test dir; install and write per group). One shared root (common case): single project. Record each file's packageRoot for the write step.


2. Load preferences

Read test-preferences.json at the project root (file tool; "not found" = no prefs).

  • Found (the common write path): load tool, additionalTools, e2eTool, testDir, filePattern, packageManager; skip to Step 5.
  • NO_PREFS (first run): read modes/setup.md and do its Step 4 (stack detection and framework questions), then return here for Step 5 (installation check), then do its Step 6 (save preferences), then continue at Step 7. Do not read modes/setup.md on a write run.

3. No uncommitted changes

Empty scope: skip the framework questions, tell the engineer, offer fallbacks:

Ask — "No uncommitted source changes found. What should I test?"  (header: "No changes")
- "The last commit": "Diff HEAD~1..HEAD and test what that commit changed"
- "Specific files": "I'll test the files or directory you name"
- "Nothing right now": "Stop. I'll run /test after I make changes"
  • Last commit: scope = git diff --name-only --diff-filter=ACMR HEAD~1 HEAD, re-run Step 1b.
  • Specific files: classify the named files, continue.
  • Nothing: stop cleanly.

5. Installation check

Check the chosen unit tool, E2E tool (if any), and addon (if any) with file tools:

  • JS/TS: under node_modules/<pkg>, or in package.json devDependencies?
  • Python: in pyproject.toml/requirements.txt (or pip show <tool> where Python is available)?
  • Go: stretchr/testify in go.sum?

All present → Step 6. Any missing → confirm first:

Ask — "<missing tools> not installed. Install now?"  (header: "Install")
- "Yes, install and continue": "Run the install with the detected package manager, then write tests"
- "No, write runnable stubs": "Skip install; write tests I can run once I install the tools myself"

Yes: install with the project's package manager (pnpm shown; substitute the detected npm/yarn/bun, or the language's manager for Python/Go):

pnpm add -D vitest                                            # unit
pnpm add -D @testing-library/react @testing-library/user-event @testing-library/jest-dom  # addon
pnpm add -D @playwright/test && pnpm exec playwright install  # E2E (Playwright)
pnpm add -D cypress                                          # E2E (Cypress)
pip install pytest pytest-mock                                # Python
go get github.com/stretchr/testify                           # Go

"No": record INSTALL=deferred; write complete tests anyway, the run command is reported as "run after installing".


7. Gather lightweight pointers (do NOT read heavy files here)

Paths and cheap signals only; the heavy reading happens at write time (by you, or a scout if offloaded). Do not read ADRs or design.md in full here. Don't read source files here; they're read at write time.

With file tools:

  • List the 3 most-recently-modified ADR paths under docs/adr/ (paths only).
  • Identify the governing ADR: the feature dir docs/adr/NNNN-<feature>/ (or single docs/adr/NNNN-<feature>.md) these files implement, matched by branch/feature name or touched surfaces (a docs/scope/ entry, if present, points to it). Note its path and whether a verify.md sits beside it (docs/adr/NNNN-<feature>/verify.md). This contract is what tests trace to; it may not be among the 3 recent paths. Set TRACETOCONTRACT = yes when a governing ADR exists, else no.
  • Note whether design.md exists at the project root; use its path only when a component or page/flow file is in scope, else none.
  • Read AGENTS.md (canonical; CLAUDE.md if absent) as project context (short and cheap). Also note the build approach as one line: the slice-shaping approach the team chose, recorded in the scope header (or root AGENTS.md), e.g. thin end-to-end path, thinnest-usable-whole core loop, UI-first shell on placeholders, full user journey per phase. It doesn't branch the logic; it calibrates your judgment when writing (Step 8, rule a).
  • Read package.json, note scripts.test. RUN_COMMAND = <pkgmgr> test when a test script exists (<pkgmgr> run test for npm); a raw invocation (e.g. pnpm exec vitest run) only when none does.

7.5 Ask whether to run the suite (always)

Ask — "Tests will be written for <N> changed files. Run the suite after writing?"  (header: "Run tests?")
- "Yes, run and fix to green": "Execute the suite; I'll fix any test mistakes and flag real bugs the tests catch"
- "Skip, just write them": "Write the tests and give me manual run-and-verify instructions instead"

Set RUN_AFTER = yes | no and apply it at write time.

8. Write the suite (main thread)

The main thread writes the tests itself. Do not spawn a writer. Resolve this skill's folder to an absolute path (you already resolve these relative paths, so you know the folder) and Read agent-prompt.md and writing-guide.md now (only now, at write time): agent-prompt.md is your operating template, writing-guide.md is the strategy, tool rules, iteration loop, and report format you follow. Reading the changed files under test is the one expensive part; for a large or unfamiliar set, offload just the reading to a read-only scout subagent on the cheapest model (Claude Code: haiku, not inheriting the session model) that returns a compact map, then write from it.

The inputs to apply (the labeled values you gathered):

  1. unit tool, E2E tool, additional tools, INSTALL state; testDir, filePattern, package manager, stack/framework, packageRoot; the classified scope (each file path with its class: logic / component / page-flow / api-server / cli); RUNCOMMAND, RUNAFTER; project context plus the build approach line; the 3 recent ADR paths or none (read only if relevant to what you're testing); the design.md path or none; TRACETOCONTRACT, the governing ADR path, and the verify.md path (each none if absent).
  2. Two rules to apply: (a) let the build approach calibrate which behaviors are durably real for this slice (lock those in as stable assertions) versus deliberate scaffolding the slice fakes by design (don't assert a real implementation the plan hasn't built yet, e.g. a real-backend expectation on a shell that stubs its data). (b) when TRACETOCONTRACT = yes, read the acceptance criteria (from verify.md if present, preferring its already-resolved AC-N-tagged checklist, else the ADR's ## Requirements) and lock in the durable ones: an automated test for every criterion that can be pinned as a stable assertion, each test tagged with the AC-N it covers (e.g. a covers: AC-3 comment, or AC-3 in the test title) so the suite traces back to the contract. Never fake a criterion that can't be automated (visual/manual/environmental, e.g. "email actually arrives"); record it in NOT_COVERED as AC-N — <why not automatable> → defer to /check verify manual step.

Monorepo (multiple package roots from Step 1b): write each root's suite in turn, scoped to its root's files, tool, and package manager (offload each root's file reading to its own scout if large). Single root (common case): just write it.


After writing the suite

If the write failed or produced no report: say so and re-do it; never report a passing or failing suite you didn't actually produce. Otherwise relay the format matching RUN_AFTER.

Update the scope: if this feature is on the scope (docs/scope/) and the suite passes, tick its Test it box. If Design, Build (+ its milestones), Verify, and Test are now all ticked, set the feature's status to done (in the At-a-glance table and beside the heading). If tests fail or coverage is partial, leave Test it unticked and the status in-progress. On done, advise /clear before the next feature: the scope and ADR hold everything, a fresh session keeps the next build cheap.

Parse from the report: TESTSWRITTEN, NOTCOVERED, plus RUNRESULT and BUGSFOUND when RUNAFTER = yes, or MANUALINSTRUCTIONS when RUNAFTER = no. Relay this template: keep lines marked ← yes only when RUNAFTER = yes, ← no only when RUN_AFTER = no (a marked heading carries its list lines), unmarked lines always; strip the markers.

## /test complete (suite run)      ← yes; when no, use: ## /test complete (not run)

**Scope**: <N> changed files (uncommitted)
**Tool**: <unit tool> [+ E2E tool] [+ addons]
**Preferences**: loaded | saved to test-preferences.json

**Tests written**:
- `<file path>`, <N tests> covering <happy path / edges / errors / a11y> [→ AC-1, AC-3]

**Run result**: <X passed, Y failed> via `<RUN_COMMAND>`   ← yes

**Traceability** (only when TRACE_TO_CONTRACT=yes, ADR NNNN):
- AC-1 ✅ locked in, `<test file · test name>`
- AC-3 ✅ locked in, `<test file · test name>`

**Bugs caught** (tests failing because the code is wrong, not the test):   ← yes
- <file:line, what's broken and the failing expectation>   ← only if BUGS_FOUND is non-empty

**How to run them**:   ← no
1. <setup step, e.g. install if INSTALL=deferred>
2. Run: `<RUN_COMMAND>`
3. Watch a single file: `<focused command>`

**What you should see**: <expected pass output, and which tests prove which behaviour>   ← no
**If something fails**: <how to read the failure, is it a test gap or a real bug>   ← no

**Not covered** (consider adding):
- <gap and why>
- AC-N, <criterion that can't be automated (visual/manual/env)> → defer to /check verify manual step   ← when TRACE_TO_CONTRACT=yes

If BUGS_FOUND is non-empty, lead with it: a test that correctly fails on real broken code is a genuine finding, not something to silence. /test does not modify application code to make a test pass.

This skill is complete after relaying the report: it does not invoke other skills.


Reference files (in this skill's folder; referenced by relative path)

  • modes/setup.md: first-run-only steps (stack detection, framework questions, save preferences); read on the main thread only when NO_PREFS
  • agent-prompt.md: the operating template the main thread reads at write time (Step 8)
  • writing-guide.md: strategy, tool rules, iteration loop, report format; the main thread reads it at write time too