composio-community/awesome-codex-skills

support-ticket-triage

Triage customer support tickets/emails/chats into categories, priority, and next action; draft responses and create reproducible steps; use for Zendesk/Intercom/Help Scout exports or pasted threads.

First seen Jan 24, 2026

Installation

$ npx skills add composio-community/awesome-codex-skills --skill support-ticket-triage

Similar popular skills

Related neighbors and high-traction skills in the same topics — useful to compare before installing.

Also in this package

Other skills from composio-community/awesome-codex-skills · top by installs.

npx skills add composio-community/awesome-codex-skills

Browse all from composio-community/awesome-codex-skills

More details

Agent compatibility

Declared targets from SKILL.md / docs. Unmarked agents are not listed — the skill may still install via the CLI.

Claude Code Not declared
Cursor Not declared
Codex Not declared
GitHub Copilot Not declared
Windsurf Not declared
Gemini CLI Not declared
Cline Not declared
OpenCode Not declared

Repository health

Stars 16.3K
Default branch master
Open issues 13
Status Active

Skill metadata

Parsed from SKILL.md frontmatter.

More metadata
short-description
Categorize and respond to support tickets

Package contents

Files included with this skill beyond the listing page.

  • skill md SKILL.md 1,459 B
  • docs SUMMARY.md 224 B

History

  1. First seen on skills.sh
  2. First recorded snapshot · 522 installs

SKILL.md

Support Ticket Triage

Standardize how to classify and respond to incoming tickets.

Inputs to gather

  • Ticket text (include attachments/links), product area, customer plan/tier if known.
  • Desired outputs: category taxonomy, priority levels, SLA hints, tone/brand voice, whether to draft a reply.

Workflow

  1. Parse context: identify issue type, product surface, severity, customer impact, reproduction hints, and blockers.
  2. Categorize: assign category and subcategory; set priority (e.g., P0–P3) with short justification.
  3. Draft response (if asked): concise acknowledgment, empathy, restate issue, next steps, and ask for missing info; include reproduction checklist when uncertain.
  4. Internal notes: suspected root cause, logs to pull, teams to loop, and tracking IDs to create/attach.
  5. Output: tabular or bullet summary with Category, Priority, Summary, Proposed Fix/Next Steps, Reply Draft.

Quality checks

  • Avoid promises; give ranges not exact ETAs unless provided.
  • Mask PII if copying to public channels.
  • If signal is weak, present 2–3 likely categories and what evidence would disambiguate.