Create PR

Open a pull request for a completed task branch.

This skill reads the full spec hierarchy (Task + Feature + Epic) and the branch diff. It writes a PR description that explains why the change exists, not only what it does.

Process

0. GitHub CLI setup

Run steps 1–2 of ../references/gh-setup.md (install check and auth check). Stop if gh is not installed or not authenticated. Extensions are not required for this skill.

Skip this step if invoked from wtf.verify-task or another skill that already ran gh-setup this session.

1. Confirm the branch

Check the current branch. Verify it is not main:

git branch --show-current

If on main, call AskUserQuestion (per ../references/questioning-style.md):

• question: "Which branch should I open a PR from?"
• header: "Branch"
• options: from git branch --list (local branches)

Check whether a PR already exists for this branch:

gh pr list --head <branch_name> --state open

If an open PR already exists, print its URL and call AskUserQuestion (per ../references/questioning-style.md):

• question: "A PR already exists for this branch. Would you like me to update its description instead?"
• header: "Existing PR"
• options:

- Update description → skip to step 5, targeting the existing PR for update via gh pr edit <pr_number> - Open a new one → create a new PR anyway

2. Identify the Task (if any)

Try to extract a task number from the branch name (e.g. task/42-date-range-filter → #42).

If found, call AskUserQuestion (per ../references/questioning-style.md):

• question: "I found Task #<n> linked to this branch. Is that the right task?"
• header: "Linked task"
• options:

- Yes, that's correct → use Task #<n> - No, use a different task → I'll provide the correct issue number

If not found or the user says no, call AskUserQuestion (per ../references/questioning-style.md):

• question: "Is there a Task issue linked to this work?"
• header: "Linked task"
• options:

- No linked task → proceed without a task link - Yes — I'll provide the number → enter the task issue number

3. Lifecycle check (if Task linked)

If no Task is linked, skip this step.

Apply the absent-label gate from ../references/lifecycle-labels.md for the verified label on the Task — recommended skill wtf.verify-task, header Verify first?. On Verify first → follow wtf.verify-task passing the Task number as context. On Open PR anyway → proceed.

4. Fetch the spec hierarchy

If a Task issue is known, walk Task → Feature → Epic per ../references/spec-hierarchy.md. Extract Gherkin, Contracts, DoD, and Test Mapping from the Task. Extract ACs, Goal, and constraints from the Feature and Epic.

If no Task issue, skip hierarchy fetch. The PR will be written from diff context alone (step 5).

5. Inspect the diff

Determine the base branch using the same logic as step 8. For task/, use the parent feature branch. For feature/, use main. Then collect the branch diff against that base:

git log <base_branch>..HEAD --oneline
git diff <base_branch>...HEAD --stat

This avoids unrelated merged commits when the branch has a long history against main. Use --stat output only unless a specific commit message is ambiguous and cannot be resolved without the diff.

6. Draft the PR

Apply strict STE per ../references/ste-writing.md before writing any durable body.

Title generation: Spawn a subagent using the claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 model — apply ../references/subagent-protocol.md for the spawn — to generate a PR title per ../references/commit-conventions.md. Pass in the task title (if available), the commit log, and whether this is a breaking change. If the subagent returns nothing usable, generate the title directly following the same rules. Examples: feat(search): add date range filter, fix(payments): prevent double settlement, refactor(orders): extract fulfilment service.

Body: Load the PR template per ../references/issue-template-loading.md (verify .github/pullrequesttemplate.md exists, halt-or-setup if missing). Complete all sections:

• Summary: derived from the Task's Intent + Functional Description (or commit messages if no Task). Explain the why.
• Changes: grouped logical summary of git diff --stat output — not a file list.
• Test plan: if a Task exists, derive checklist items from the Gherkin scenario names. If no Task, derive from changed files and commit messages. At minimum one item per observable behavior changed.
• Related: closure keywords per ../references/commit-conventions.md. If a Task exists, include Closes #<tasknumber>. If the PR also closes the parent Feature (all sibling tasks already merged), add Closes #<featurenumber> on its own line.

7. Review with user

Show the draft title and body. Then call AskUserQuestion (per ../references/questioning-style.md):

• question: "Does this look right?"
• header: "Review"
• options:

- Looks good — create the PR → proceed with PR creation - I have changes → adjust first

Apply edits, then proceed.

8. Create the PR

Determine the base branch from the current branch name:

• task/* branch → target the parent feature branch (feature/<feature-number>-<feature-slug>)
• feature/* branch → target main
• Other → call AskUserQuestion (per ../references/questioning-style.md):

- question: "What branch should this PR target?" - header: "Base branch" - options: from git branch -r

Write the body to a temp file ($BODY) with the Write tool. Then create the PR via the gh body helper (../references/gh-body-helper.md) so the description survives UTF-8 on Windows:

# $BODY is the temp file you wrote the PR body to with the Write tool.

# task branch:
python3 .wtf/gh-body.py create --pr \
  --title "<title>" \
  --body-file "$BODY" \
  --base feature/<feature-number>-<feature-slug>

# feature branch:
python3 .wtf/gh-body.py create --pr \
  --title "<title>" \
  --body-file "$BODY" \
  --base main

Print the PR URL.

9. Update the Task issue (if linked)

If a Task issue is linked, post a comment linking the PR:

# Write "PR opened: <pr_url>" to a temp file with the Write tool ($COMMENT), then:
python3 .wtf/gh-body.py comment <task_number> --body-file "$COMMENT"

10. Offer next steps

Call AskUserQuestion (per ../references/questioning-style.md):

• question: "What's next?"
• header: "Next step"
• options:

- Request a review → add reviewers to this PR now (default) - Done → exit, no further action

On Request a review → call AskUserQuestion (per ../references/questioning-style.md):

• question: "Who should review this?"
• header: "Reviewer"
• options: from team member usernames inferred from recent git log authors or the repository's CODEOWNERS file

Then: ``bash gh pr edit <pr_number> --add-reviewer <username> ` For multiple reviewers, pass a comma-separated list: --add-reviewer user1,user2`. Print the PR URL.

• Done → exit.