validkeys/sherpy

gap-analysis-worksheet

Analyzes an initial business requirements document for gaps, ambiguities, and missing information.

First seen Mar 26, 2026

Installation

$ npx skills add validkeys/sherpy --skill gap-analysis-worksheet

Summary

  • Analyzes an initial business requirements document for gaps, ambiguities, and missing information.
  • Generates gap-analysis-worksheet.md with structured requirement/question/answer blocks grouped by category — designed to be completed by a business analyst before formal requirements gathering begins.

Similar popular skills

Related neighbors and high-traction skills in the same topics — useful to compare before installing.

Also in this package

Other skills from validkeys/sherpy · top by installs.

npx skills add validkeys/sherpy

Browse all from validkeys/sherpy

More details

Agent compatibility

Declared targets from SKILL.md / docs. Unmarked agents are not listed — the skill may still install via the CLI.

Claude Code Not declared
Cursor Not declared
Codex Not declared
GitHub Copilot Not declared
Windsurf Not declared
Gemini CLI Not declared
Cline Not declared
OpenCode Not declared

Repository health

Stars 1
License LICENSE
Default branch main
Open issues 1
Status Active

Package contents

Files included with this skill beyond the listing page.

  • skill md SKILL.md 7,153 B
  • docs SUMMARY.md 331 B

History

  1. First seen on skills.sh
  2. First recorded snapshot · 70 installs

SKILL.md

Gap Analysis Worksheet

Analyzes an initial requirements document for gaps, ambiguities, and missing information. Produces gap-analysis-worksheet.md — a structured worksheet for a business analyst to complete before proceeding to /business-requirements-interview.

Purpose

Initial requirements from stakeholders typically contain:

  • Vague or ambiguous statements
  • Missing personas or user types
  • Undefined scope boundaries
  • Unstated assumptions
  • Missing non-functional requirements
  • Undefined success criteria

This skill surfaces those gaps as targeted questions, ensuring the formal requirements interview builds on validated, complete inputs.

Prerequisites

  • An initial requirements document in any format: plain text, Markdown, YAML, PDF summary, meeting notes, product brief, or similar

Usage

/gap-analysis-worksheet path/to/requirements [base-directory]

If no base directory is provided, auto-detect by looking for requirements/ folder in the current directory.

If not found, prompt the user: "Where should I create the gap analysis worksheet?"

Wait for the user to provide a path before proceeding. Store as base_directory.

Process

Step 1: Load & Read the Requirements

Read the input document in full. Identify all stated requirements, goals, personas, constraints, and assumptions.

Step 2: Analyze for Gaps by Category

For each category below, scan the document and identify gaps. A gap is any of:

  • Missing — Information that should be present but isn't stated at all
  • Ambiguous — A statement that could be interpreted multiple ways
  • Incomplete — A requirement that is only partially specified
  • Contradictory — Statements that conflict with each other
  • Assumed — Something implied but never explicitly stated

Gap Categories (evaluate all eleven):

  1. Problem & Goals — Is the core problem clearly defined? Are goals specific and measurable?
  2. Personas & Users — Are all user types identified? Are their needs and pain points described?
  3. Scope — What is explicitly in scope vs. out of scope? Where are the boundaries?
  4. Functional Requirements — Are all features described with enough detail to build? Are edge cases addressed?
  5. Non-Functional Requirements — Performance, security, scalability, accessibility, reliability expectations?
  6. Success Criteria — How will success be measured? What does "done" look like?
  7. Assumptions — What is being assumed but not stated? What dependencies are implied?
  8. Constraints — Technical, timeline, budget, regulatory, or team constraints?
  9. Dependencies & Integrations — External systems, APIs, third-party services, or team dependencies?
  10. Risks — What could go wrong? Are any mitigation strategies needed?
  11. UI/UX Implications — Does the project involve user-facing interfaces? Are all screens/pages identified? Are interaction patterns described? Are accessibility requirements stated? Is there a design system or component library? Are responsive/mobile considerations addressed? When gaps are found, add recommendation: "UI work detected — wireframe planning will be triggered after implementation planning (Step 6)."

Skip any category that has no gaps — do not include empty sections in the output.

Step 3: Write gap-analysis-worksheet.md

Write {base_directory}/requirements/gap-analysis-worksheet.md.

Create directory if it doesn't exist:

mkdir -p {base_directory}/requirements

Output Format

Write {base_directory}/requirements/gap-analysis-worksheet.md.

The output is a Markdown document with a header (document path, generated date, status, total gaps) followed by sections for each gap category. Each gap includes a requirement snippet, a specific question, and an answer field.

See [references/output-spec.md](references/output-spec.md) for the complete document specification with all categories, gap structure, and validation rules.

See [references/example.yaml](references/example.yaml) for a full example.

Writing Good Gap Questions

Be specific — Reference the exact requirement or missing area.

Good: What is the maximum file size a user can upload?
Bad: Are there any limits?

Be answerable — The business analyst should be able to respond with a concrete answer.

Good: Should unauthenticated users be able to view public workflows, or is login required for all access?
Bad: What about authentication?

One gap per question — Do not combine multiple gaps into one question.

Good: What should happen when a workflow task fails — should the entire workflow stop, or continue with remaining tasks?
Bad: What should happen with errors and timeouts and retries?

Prioritize critical gaps — Questions about core functionality, personas, and scope come before nice-to-have clarifications.

Requirement Snippet Guidelines

  • Use a direct quote from the document when possible — keep it under 15 words
  • If the gap is about something entirely missing, use: "Not addressed in requirements"
  • If the gap applies to a whole section rather than a specific line, reference the section: "[Goals section]"

Example Output

See [references/example.yaml](references/example.yaml) for a complete sample based on the spec example input.

Self-Review

After generating the worksheet, perform the following checks and output a brief summary inline.

Checks

  • All 11 categories were evaluated (skipped categories had no gaps worth capturing)
  • Every question is specific and answerable by a business analyst
  • No two questions address the same gap
  • Critical gaps (scope, personas, core functionality) are listed first within their category
  • Requirement snippets accurately reflect the source document
  • No category with real gaps was omitted

Inline Summary

## Worksheet Summary

**Input:** [requirements file]
**Output:** gap-analysis-worksheet.md
**Total Gaps Found:** [n]

By Category:
  Problem & Goals:              [n gaps or "✓ no gaps"]
  Personas & Users:             [n gaps or "✓ no gaps"]
  Scope:                        [n gaps or "✓ no gaps"]
  Functional Requirements:      [n gaps or "✓ no gaps"]
  Non-Functional Requirements:  [n gaps or "✓ no gaps"]
  Success Criteria:             [n gaps or "✓ no gaps"]
  Assumptions:                  [n gaps or "✓ no gaps"]
  Constraints:                  [n gaps or "✓ no gaps"]
  Dependencies & Integrations:  [n gaps or "✓ no gaps"]
  Risks:                        [n gaps or "✓ no gaps"]
  UI/UX Implications:           [n gaps or "✓ no gaps"]

Next step → Complete the worksheet, then run:
  /business-requirements-interview