Analyze recent post-earnings stocks using a 5-factor weighted scoring system to identify the strongest earnings reactions for potential momentum trades.
When to Use
User asks for post-earnings trade analysis or earnings gap screening
User wants to find the best recent earnings reactions
User requests earnings momentum scoring or grading
User asks about post-earnings accumulation day (PEAD) candidates
Prerequisites
FMP API key (set FMPAPIKEY environment variable or pass --api-key)
Free tier (250 calls/day) is sufficient for default screening (lookback 2 days, top 20)
Paid tier recommended for larger lookback windows or full screening
Workflow
Step 1: Run the Earnings Trade Analyzer
Execute the analyzer script:
# Default: last 2 days of earnings, top 20 results
python3 skills/earnings-trade-analyzer/scripts/analyze_earnings_trades.py --output-dir reports/
# Custom lookback and market cap filter
python3 skills/earnings-trade-analyzer/scripts/analyze_earnings_trades.py \
--lookback-days 5 \
--min-market-cap 1000000000 \
--top 30 \
--output-dir reports/
# With entry quality filter
python3 skills/earnings-trade-analyzer/scripts/analyze_earnings_trades.py \
--apply-entry-filter \
--output-dir reports/
Degraded endpoint / budget fallback for scheduled reviews
If the analyzer reports a 404, an implausible empty earnings calendar, or exhausts its API-call budget before producing scored candidates during a scheduled after-close/pre-market run, do not report "no earnings reactions" immediately.
First retry once with a narrower liquid-universe configuration so the full 5-factor scorer has a chance to complete, for example:
If the scored run still returns no candidates or cannot complete, verify the same range through the stable endpoint used by the compatibility shim and clearly label the result as an ungraded fallback:
Then optionally enrich returned US tickers through the analyzer's stable-first FMP client or per-symbol /stable/quote?symbol=<ticker> calls to rank by same-day changesPercentage, market cap, and liquidity. Use legacy /api/v3 quote calls only as a legacy-key fallback after stable has failed. Present these as preliminary / ungraded reactions because the 5-factor scorer did not run; do not assign A/B/C/D grades from the fallback alone.
No-candidate output pitfall: The analyzer may print Candidates after filtering: 0 / No candidates found matching criteria. and exit successfully without writing an earningstradeanalyzer_*.json file. In that case, do not try to run PEAD Mode B from a nonexistent candidate file. Say explicitly that no scored analyzer JSON was produced, run the endpoint/quote enrichment fallback above if the routine needs an earnings section, and label any names as manual-review only.
Step 2: Review Results
Read the generated JSON and Markdown reports
Load references/scoring_methodology.md for scoring interpretation context
Focus on Grade A and B stocks for actionable setups
Step 3: Present Analysis
For each top candidate, present:
Composite score and letter grade (A/B/C/D)
Earnings gap size and direction
Pre-earnings 20-day trend
Volume ratio (20-day vs 60-day average)
Position relative to 200-day and 50-day moving averages
Weakest and strongest scoring components
Step 4: Provide Actionable Guidance
Based on grades:
Grade A (85+): Strong earnings reaction with institutional accumulation - consider entry
Grade B (70-84): Good earnings reaction worth monitoring - wait for pullback or confirmation
Grade C (55-69): Mixed signals - use caution, additional analysis needed
Grade D (<55): Weak setup - avoid or wait for better conditions
Output
earningstradeanalyzerYYYY-MM-DDHHMMSS.json - Structured results with schema_version "1.0"
earningstradeanalyzerYYYY-MM-DDHHMMSS.md - Human-readable report with tables