Page QA

This is the final gate. It exists because good-looking pages can still be strategically wrong, untrustworthy, or impossible to ship.

Required inputs

• workspace/pages/[page-name]/strategy.json
• workspace/pages/[page-name]/copy.md
• workspace/pages/[page-name]/index.html
• workspace/pages/[page-name]/meta.json
• workspace/pages/[page-name]/visuals/index.md
• workspace/pages/[page-name]/visuals/manifest.json when present
• references/anti-slop.md

QA dimensions

Score each 1-10 unless pass/fail is more appropriate.

1. Mechanism preservation

• is the unique mechanism visible and understandable?
• does the page explain why this works?
• did aesthetics overpower explanation?

2. Proof discipline

• are all stats, testimonials, logos, guarantees, and claims provenance-tagged?
• is anything non-shippable still presented as real?

3. Trust cue preservation

• were critical trust conventions preserved?
• were category-legitimacy cues kept intact?

4. Copy sharpness

• specificity
• fluff control
• objection coverage
• CTA clarity

5. Visual fidelity

• correct preservation class use
• no fake precision where exactness was required
• no obvious artifacts
• provider fallback history is reflected honestly in metadata when relevant

6. Build quality

• responsive structure
• contrast
• semantics
• focus states
• alt text

7. Anti-slop compliance

• no banned patterns
• anti-slop used without overriding brand fidelity

Output format

Write workspace/pages/[page-name]/qa.md:

# QA Report: [page-name]
Generated:

| Dimension | Score | Threshold | Result | Notes |
|---|---:|---:|---|---|
| mechanism preservation | | 8 | pass/fail | |
| proof discipline | | 9 | pass/fail | |
| trust cue preservation | | 8 | pass/fail | |
| copy sharpness | | 8 | pass/fail | |
| visual fidelity | | 8 | pass/fail | |
| build quality | | 8 | pass/fail | |
| anti-slop compliance | | 8 | pass/fail | |

## Hard fails
- 

## Draft-only flags
- 

## Required fixes before ship
1. 
2. 
3. 

## Verdict
- shippable
- draft only
- blocked

Eval Reference

For the full scoring criteria, pass thresholds, ranking weights, and verdict logic, see references/eval-rubric.md (bundled with this skill).

Verdict logic

Blocked if:

• proof is invented or untraceable in a way that affects conversion claims
• mechanism is unclear
• CTA path is broken
• critical accessibility or rendering issues exist

Draft only if:

• structure is good but proof or asset gaps remain
• some visuals are placeholders
• compliance review is still required

Shippable only if all hard thresholds pass.