SkillsAdd

smithery/zstonedpm

code-review

Review implemented code for correctness, bugs, and code quality

Installation

$ npx skills add smithery/zstonedpm --skill code-review
View on skills.sh ↗ Website ↗

Similar popular skills

Related neighbors and high-traction skills in the same topics — useful to compare before installing.

flutter-add-widget-preview Similar name
flutter/agent-plugins

Adds interactive widget previews to the project using the previews.dart system. Use when creati…

29.4K installs
recipe-review-overdue-tasks Similar name
googleworkspace/cli

Find Google Tasks that are past due and need attention.

27.2K installs
recipe-review-meet-participants Similar name
googleworkspace/cli

Review who attended a Google Meet conference and for how long.

26.9K installs
security-review Similar name
getsentry/skills

Security code review for vulnerabilities.

15.5K installs
web-design-reviewer Similar name
github/awesome-copilot

This skill enables visual inspection of websites running locally or remotely to identify and fi…

13.3K installs
sql-code-review Similar name
github/awesome-copilot

Universal SQL code review assistant that performs comprehensive security, maintainability, and …

13K installs

Also in this package

Other skills from smithery/zstonedpm.

npx skills add smithery/zstonedpm
create-brief 0

Browse all from smithery/zstonedpm

More details

Agent compatibility

Declared targets from SKILL.md / docs. Unmarked agents are not listed — the skill may still install via the CLI.

Claude Code Not declared
Cursor Not declared
Codex Not declared
GitHub Copilot Not declared
Windsurf Not declared
Gemini CLI Not declared
Cline Not declared
OpenCode Not declared

Package contents

Files included with this skill beyond the listing page.

  • skill md SKILL.md 773 B
  • docs SUMMARY.md 82 B

History

  1. First recorded snapshot · 0 installs

SKILL.md

We just implemented the feature described in the attached plan.

Please do a thorough code review:

Make sure that the plan was correctly implemented. Look for any obvious bugs or issues in the code. Look for subtle data alignment issues (e.g. expecting snakecase but getting camelCase or expecting data to come through in an object but receiving a nested object like {data:{}}) Look for any over-engineering or files getting too large and needing refactoring Look for any weird syntax or style that doesn't match other parts of the codebase Document your findings in docs/features/\REVIEW.md unless a different file name is specified.