smithery/willoscar

rubric-writer

Use when `paper-review` has claims plus evidence gaps and needs the final referee-style report.

Installation

$ npx skills add smithery/willoscar --skill rubric-writer

Similar popular skills

Related neighbors and high-traction skills in the same topics — useful to compare before installing.

Also in this package

Other skills from smithery/willoscar · top by installs.

npx skills add smithery/willoscar

Browse all from smithery/willoscar

More details

Agent compatibility

Declared targets from SKILL.md / docs. Unmarked agents are not listed — the skill may still install via the CLI.

Claude Code Not declared
Cursor Not declared
Codex Not declared
GitHub Copilot Not declared
Windsurf Not declared
Gemini CLI Not declared
Cline Not declared
OpenCode Not declared

Package contents

Files included with this skill beyond the listing page.

  • skill md SKILL.md 1,443 B
  • docs SUMMARY.md 665 B

History

  1. First recorded snapshot · 0 installs

SKILL.md

Rubric Writer

Triggers & routing

  • Trigger: rubric review, referee report, peer review write-up, 审稿报告, REVIEW.md.
  • Use when: paper-review pipeline 的最后阶段(C3),已有 output/CLAIMS.md + output/MISSING_EVIDENCE.md(以及可选 novelty matrix)。

Transforms review evidence artifacts into the final paper-review deliverable.

Inputs

Required:

  • output/CLAIMS.md
  • output/MISSING_EVIDENCE.md

Optional:

  • output/NOVELTY_MATRIX.md
  • DECISIONS.md

Output

  • output/REVIEW.md

Contract

The review must expose stable sections:

  • ### Summary
  • ### Novelty
  • ### Soundness
  • ### Clarity
  • ### Impact
  • ### Major Concerns
  • ### Minor Comments
  • ### Recommendation

Every major concern must cite its claimid or gapid. This is the traceability interface consumed by the paper-review scorecard.

Script boundary

scripts/run.py should:

  • read prior review artifacts
  • render the stable rubric sections
  • keep the review bounded and traceable

It should not re-parse the manuscript from scratch or perform retrieval.

Acceptance

  • output/REVIEW.md exists
  • includes all stable rubric sections
  • recommendation is explicit

Non-goals

  • deep manuscript parsing
  • novelty retrieval
  • writing an author rebuttal