smithery/willoscar

post-merge-voice-gate

Post-merge paper-voice gate: inspect the reader-facing draft for planner-talk and axis-label artifacts, then route fixes to the actual source.

Installation

$ npx skills add smithery/willoscar --skill post-merge-voice-gate

Similar popular skills

Related neighbors and high-traction skills in the same topics — useful to compare before installing.

Also in this package

Other skills from smithery/willoscar · top by installs.

npx skills add smithery/willoscar

Browse all from smithery/willoscar

More details

Agent compatibility

Declared targets from SKILL.md / docs. Unmarked agents are not listed — the skill may still install via the CLI.

Claude Code Not declared
Cursor Not declared
Codex Declared
GitHub Copilot Not declared
Windsurf Not declared
Gemini CLI Not declared
Cline Not declared
OpenCode Not declared

Skill metadata

Parsed from SKILL.md frontmatter.

Declared agents codex

Package contents

Files included with this skill beyond the listing page.

  • skill md SKILL.md 4,672 B
  • docs SUMMARY.md 761 B

History

  1. First recorded snapshot · 0 installs

SKILL.md

Post-merge Voice Gate

Triggers & routing

  • Trigger: post-merge voice gate, merge voice gate, transition leakage, planner talk, 合并后口吻门, 过渡句污染.
  • Use when: section-merger has produced output/DRAFT.md and you want to ensure merge-injected text won't drag the draft into generator voice before polishing.

Purpose: catch the highest-impact "automation tells" that appear after merge.

Why this exists:

  • Merge can expose planner-talk in section prose or explicitly enabled transitions.
  • Even a few planner-talk or axis-label sentences can make an otherwise solid draft read like a generator.
  • Fixes should land at the earliest responsible artifact: normally the owning

section, or outline/transitions.md only when insertion was enabled.

This skill is a gate:

  • It writes a report (output/POSTMERGEVOICE_REPORT.md).
  • If FAIL, it also appends to output/QUALITY_GATE.md so the workspace remains debuggable.

Role prompt: Voice Gatekeeper (paper voice, no new facts)

You are the post-merge voice gatekeeper for a survey draft.

Your job is to detect high-signal generator voice in the merged draft:
- planner-talk transitions ("To keep the chapter...", "The remaining uncertainty is...")
- slide/navigation narration ("Next, we move...", "We now turn...")
- axis-label slash lists (A / B / C; planning/memory) used as prose

Rules:
- do not change the draft directly; route fixes to the source file
- do not invent facts or citations
- keep fixes minimal and content-bearing (argument bridges, not navigation)

Output:
- a short PASS/FAIL report with a routing plan

Inputs

  • output/DRAFT.md
  • outline/transitions.md

outline/transitions.md is an optional planning artifact by default. It is treated as a possible reader-facing source only when outline/transitions.inserth3.ok or outline/transitions.inserth2.ok exists.

Output

  • output/POSTMERGEVOICE_REPORT.md (always written)

What this gate checks (high-signal only)

  • Planner-talk transition stems (construction notes that read like comments in the paper body)
  • Slash-list axis markers in reader-facing draft prose (A / B / C)
  • Slide/navigation narration that should be argument bridges

Rewrite triggers (if you see these, FAIL and route)

These stems are high-signal generator voice once injected into the draft body:

  • "To keep ..." / "To keep the chapter..."
  • "The remaining uncertainty is ..."
  • "as the comparison lens" / "as the reference point"
  • slash-list axis labels using / (e.g., "retrieval / index / write policy")

Routing rules (earliest responsible artifact)

  • If transition insertion is enabled and the offending phrase appears in outline/transitions.md:

- Fix: rerun transition-weaver (or hand-edit outline/transitions.md), then rerun section-merger.

  • Otherwise (phrase only appears in the draft body):

- Fix: route to writer-selfloop / subsection-polisher / draft-polisher depending on where it occurs.

Mini rewrite examples (do not copy verbatim)

Bad (planner talk, reads like a build note):

  • To keep the chapter's comparison lens explicit, we now turn to ...

Better (argument bridge, content-bearing):

  • Once interface contracts fix what actions are executable, the next bottleneck is how agents choose among those actions under uncertainty and budget constraints.

Bad (axis-label slash list):

  • ... under mechanism/architecture/data trade-offs ...

Better (natural prose):

  • ... under trade-offs between architectural choices and the data/feedback available during interaction ...

Script (optional; deterministic gate)

Quick Start

  • uv run python .codex/skills/post-merge-voice-gate/scripts/run.py --workspace <workspace>

All Options

  • --workspace <dir>: workspace root
  • --unit-id <U###>: unit id (optional; for logs)
  • --inputs <semicolon-separated>: override inputs (rare; default: output/DRAFT.md;outline/transitions.md)
  • --outputs <semicolon-separated>: override outputs (rare; default: output/POSTMERGEVOICE_REPORT.md)
  • --checkpoint <C#>: checkpoint id (optional; for logs)

Examples

  • Run right after section-merger (recommended):

- uv run python .codex/skills/post-merge-voice-gate/scripts/run.py --workspace <workspace>

Notes

  • The script is analysis-only; it never edits content.
  • On FAIL it writes output/POSTMERGEVOICEREPORT.md and appends a short record to output/QUALITYGATE.md.