smithery/willoscar

evidence-auditor

Use when `paper-review` needs a claim-by-claim evidence gap report grounded in an extracted claim ledger.

Installation

$ npx skills add smithery/willoscar --skill evidence-auditor

Similar popular skills

Related neighbors and high-traction skills in the same topics — useful to compare before installing.

Also in this package

Other skills from smithery/willoscar · top by installs.

npx skills add smithery/willoscar

Browse all from smithery/willoscar

More details

Agent compatibility

Declared targets from SKILL.md / docs. Unmarked agents are not listed — the skill may still install via the CLI.

Claude Code Not declared
Cursor Not declared
Codex Not declared
GitHub Copilot Not declared
Windsurf Not declared
Gemini CLI Not declared
Cline Not declared
OpenCode Not declared

Package contents

Files included with this skill beyond the listing page.

  • skill md SKILL.md 1,599 B
  • docs SUMMARY.md 545 B

History

  1. First recorded snapshot · 0 installs

SKILL.md

Evidence Auditor

Triggers & routing

  • Trigger: evidence audit, missing evidence, unsupported claims, 审稿证据审计, 证据缺口.
  • Use when: paper-review 流程中,需要逐条检查 claim 的证据链、缺 baseline、评测薄弱点。
  • Skip if: 缺少 claims 输入(例如还没有 output/CLAIMS.md)。
  • Network: none.
  • Guardrail: 只写“缺口/风险/下一步验证”,不要替作者补写论述或引入新主张。

Transforms a claim ledger into a gap report for paper-review.

Input

  • output/CLAIMS.md

Output

  • output/MISSING_EVIDENCE.md
  • output/EVIDENCE_AUDIT.jsonl (review-evidence-gap.v1)

Contract

Each gap block should include:

  • claim reference
  • what evidence is already present
  • what is missing or weak
  • minimal fix
  • severity

Each JSONL record must retain claimid and a stable gapid so the final review can cite the exact failure rather than paraphrasing an unlocated concern.

Script boundary

scripts/run.py should:

  • iterate existing claims only
  • classify the likely evidence risk
  • write actionable, bounded gap items

It should not invent new claims or rewrite the manuscript.

Acceptance

  • every claim has a corresponding evidence note or gap item
  • minimal fixes are actionable and concrete
  • structured records join back to every claim_id

Non-goals

  • manuscript rewriting
  • novelty assessment
  • recommendation writing