smithery/sundial-org

cs-research-methodology

Conduct a literature review and develop a CS research proposal.

Installation

$ npx skills add smithery/sundial-org --skill cs-research-methodology

Summary

  • Conduct a literature review and develop a CS research proposal.
  • Use when asked to review a research area, find gaps in existing work, and propose a novel research contribution.
  • The output is a research proposal identifying an assumption to challenge (the "bit flip") and how to validate it.

Similar popular skills

Related neighbors and high-traction skills in the same topics — useful to compare before installing.

Also in this package

Other skills from smithery/sundial-org.

npx skills add smithery/sundial-org

Browse all from smithery/sundial-org

More details

Agent compatibility

Declared targets from SKILL.md / docs. Unmarked agents are not listed — the skill may still install via the CLI.

Claude Code Not declared
Cursor Not declared
Codex Not declared
GitHub Copilot Not declared
Windsurf Not declared
Gemini CLI Not declared
Cline Not declared
OpenCode Not declared

Package contents

Files included with this skill beyond the listing page.

  • skill md SKILL.md 1,595 B
  • docs SUMMARY.md 321 B

History

  1. First recorded snapshot · 0 installs

SKILL.md

CS Research Methodology

Framework for investigating problems by identifying assumptions and proposing alternatives.

Core Concept: The Bit Flip

Every research contribution follows this pattern:

  1. The Bit: What does everyone assume?
  2. The Flip: What's the alternative?
  3. The Proof: Why does the alternative work better?

Investigation Process

Step 1: Identify the Bit

What do existing approaches take for granted?

  • What do all solutions have in common?
  • What's implicit in how the problem is framed?

→ See [references/framing.md](references/framing.md) for process and examples.

Step 2: Find Where It Fails

When does the assumption break down?

  • Edge cases, new capabilities, adjacent fields solving it differently

→ See [references/landscape.md](references/landscape.md) for mapping approaches.

Step 3: Propose the Flip

"Current approaches assume X. Instead, Y."

  • Must be specific and testable
  • Explain the mechanism

→ See [references/prioritization.md](references/prioritization.md) for focusing investigation.

Step 4: Design the Proof

What evidence would be convincing?

  • Match evaluation to claim type

→ See [references/validation.md](references/validation.md) for evaluation design.