smithery/samarv

power-progression-strategy

A framework to identify and develop sustainable competitive advantages (Power) based on a company's lifecycle stage. Use this when drafting a product strategy, evaluating business model durability, or distinguishing between "operational excellence" and true competitive moats.

Installation

$ npx skills add smithery/samarv --skill power-progression-strategy

Similar popular skills

Related neighbors and high-traction skills in the same topics — useful to compare before installing.

Also in this package

Other skills from smithery/samarv · top by installs.

npx skills add smithery/samarv

Browse all from smithery/samarv

More details

Agent compatibility

Declared targets from SKILL.md / docs. Unmarked agents are not listed — the skill may still install via the CLI.

Claude Code Not declared
Cursor Not declared
Codex Not declared
GitHub Copilot Not declared
Windsurf Not declared
Gemini CLI Not declared
Cline Not declared
OpenCode Not declared

Package contents

Files included with this skill beyond the listing page.

  • skill md SKILL.md 5,177 B
  • docs SUMMARY.md 310 B

History

  1. First recorded snapshot · 0 installs

SKILL.md

Power Progression Strategy

Sustainable competitive advantage requires Power, defined as the combination of a Benefit (a cost or price advantage) and a Barrier (the inability of competitors to mimic that advantage). This framework helps you identify which types of Power are available to your product based on its current phase: Origination, Takeoff, or Stability.

The "To Be or Not To Be" Test

To determine if a feature or strategy provides true Power, ask:

  1. Benefit: Does this create a material improvement in my margins (lower cost) or allow me to charge a higher price?
  2. Barrier: If a competitor tried to do exactly what I am doing, would they be prevented by economics, physics, or psychology from succeeding?

If you have a benefit but no barrier, you are on a "treadmill" of operational excellence—you must run as fast as possible just to stay in place, but you have no refuge from competition.

The Power Progression Workflow

1. Origination Phase (Pre-Product Market Fit)

In this stage, your primary goal is substitution—convincing users to switch from an existing solution to yours.

  • Primary Power: Counter-Positioning.

Action: Develop a new, superior business model that an incumbent cannot mimic because doing so would damage their existing business (e.g., Netflix's mail-order DVDs vs. Blockbuster’s retail stores). Heuristic: If an incumbent's CFO would say "We can't do that because it would cannibalize our revenue," you have Counter-Positioning.

2. Takeoff Phase (Rapid Growth)

Once you have traction, your focus shifts to building barriers as you scale.

  • Power Types to Pursue:

Network Economies: The value of your product increases as more people use it. Note: This must be material. If the effect is only worth a "penny to the bottom line," it is a network effect but not a Network Economy. Scale Economies: Spreading high fixed costs over a larger volume of users (e.g., Netflix spreading $15B in content costs over 200M+ subscribers). * Switching Costs: Making it difficult or expensive for customers to leave (e.g., high integration effort or data lock-in).

3. Stability Phase (Mature Market)

These powers take a long time to build and are rarely available to startups.

  • Power Types:

Branding: An objective feeling of safety or status that allows for a price premium. Process Power: Complex, opaque organizational knowledge that results in lower costs (e.g., Toyota’s production system). * Cornered Resource: Preferential access to a coveted asset (e.g., a patent or a unique talent pool).

Examples of Power in Action

Example 1: Netflix and Scale Economies

  • Context: Netflix vs. Blockbuster during the transition to streaming.
  • Input: High fixed costs for original content.
  • Application: Netflix invests billions in content. Because they have the largest subscriber base, the "cost per subscriber" for that content is significantly lower than for a smaller competitor like Hulu or Paramount+.
  • Output: Netflix achieves higher margins than competitors even when charging similar prices, creating a "barrier" because competitors cannot match their cost efficiency without first matching their scale.

Example 2: Uber vs. Lyft (The Materiality Trap)

  • Context: Analyzing the ride-sharing market.
  • Input: Geographic network effects (more drivers = lower wait times).
  • Application: While both have "network effects," they lack "Network Economies" because the advantage is not material enough to prevent a war of attrition.
  • Output: Because the "curve flattens" (a 3-minute wait isn't significantly better than a 5-minute wait for most users), the two companies remain in a constant price war, proving that not all network effects lead to Power.

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Confusing Operational Excellence with Power: Moving fast, having a great team, or having a better UI are not "Power." These are "mimicable" traits. If a competitor can hire your VP of Engineering or copy your UI, you do not have a barrier.
  • The Data Flywheel Myth: Founders often claim data scale is a power. However, the value of additional data often experiences diminishing returns. If a competitor with 10% of your data can provide a "good enough" experience, your data is not a durable power.
  • Ignoring Materiality: Just because a "flywheel" exists doesn't mean it's a power. It must be strong enough to significantly tilt the economic returns of the business.
  • Thinking Strategy is "Strategic Planning": Strategy is not a to-do list for the year. It is a long-term focus on the fundamental determinants of business value (NPV of cash flow), specifically your source of Power.