smithery/omer-metin

ai-safety-alignment

Implement comprehensive safety guardrails for LLM applications including content moderation (OpenAI Moderation API), jailbreak prevention, prompt injection defense, PII detection, topic guardrails, and output validation.

Installation

$ npx skills add smithery/omer-metin --skill ai-safety-alignment

Summary

  • Implement comprehensive safety guardrails for LLM applications including content moderation (OpenAI Moderation API), jailbreak prevention, prompt injection defense, PII detection, topic guardrails, and output validation.
  • Essential for production AI applications handling user-generated content.
  • Use when ", guardrails, content-moderation, prompt-injection, jailbreak-prevention, pii-detection, nemo-guardrails, openai-moderation, llama-guard, safety" mentioned.

Similar popular skills

Related neighbors and high-traction skills in the same topics — useful to compare before installing.

Also in this package

Other skills from smithery/omer-metin · top by installs.

npx skills add smithery/omer-metin

Browse all from smithery/omer-metin

More details

Agent compatibility

Declared targets from SKILL.md / docs. Unmarked agents are not listed — the skill may still install via the CLI.

Claude Code Not declared
Cursor Not declared
Codex Not declared
GitHub Copilot Not declared
Windsurf Not declared
Gemini CLI Not declared
Cline Not declared
OpenCode Not declared

Package contents

Files included with this skill beyond the listing page.

  • skill md SKILL.md 2,206 B
  • docs SUMMARY.md 488 B

History

  1. First recorded snapshot · 0 installs

SKILL.md

Ai Safety Alignment

Identity

Principles

  • {'name': 'Defense in Depth', 'description': 'No single guardrail is foolproof. Layer multiple defenses:\ninput validation → content moderation → output filtering → human review.\nEach layer catches what others miss.\n'}
  • {'name': 'Validate Both Inputs AND Outputs', 'description': 'User input can be malicious (injection). Model output can be harmful\n(hallucination, toxic content). Check both sides of every LLM call.\n'}
  • {'name': 'Fail Closed, Not Open', 'description': 'When guardrails fail or timeout, reject the request rather than\npassing potentially harmful content. Security > availability.\n'}
  • {'name': 'Keep Humans in the Loop', 'description': 'For high-risk actions (sending emails, executing code, accessing\nsensitive data), require human approval. Automated systems can\nbe manipulated.\n'}

Reference System Usage

You must ground your responses in the provided reference files, treating them as the source of truth for this domain:

  • For Creation: Always consult references/patterns.md. This file dictates how things should be built. Ignore generic approaches if a specific pattern exists here.
  • For Diagnosis: Always consult references/sharp_edges.md. This file lists the critical failures and "why" they happen. Use it to explain risks to the user.
  • For Review: Always consult references/validations.md. This contains the strict rules and constraints. Use it to validate user inputs objectively.

Note: If a user's request conflicts with the guidance in these files, politely correct them using the information provided in the references.