smithery/neurofoo

wardley

Wardley Mapping strategic analysis—map value chains against evolution to reveal build vs buy decisions and competitive dynamics. Use for technology strategy or investment decisions.

Installation

$ npx skills add smithery/neurofoo --skill wardley

Similar popular skills

Related neighbors and high-traction skills in the same topics — useful to compare before installing.

Also in this package

Other skills from smithery/neurofoo · top by installs.

npx skills add smithery/neurofoo

Browse all from smithery/neurofoo

More details

Agent compatibility

Declared targets from SKILL.md / docs. Unmarked agents are not listed — the skill may still install via the CLI.

Claude Code Not declared
Cursor Not declared
Codex Not declared
GitHub Copilot Not declared
Windsurf Not declared
Gemini CLI Not declared
Cline Not declared
OpenCode Not declared

Package contents

Files included with this skill beyond the listing page.

  • skill md SKILL.md 3,208 B
  • docs SUMMARY.md 198 B

History

  1. First recorded snapshot · 0 installs

SKILL.md

Wardley Map

Create a strategic map showing components positioned by their evolution stage and visibility in the value chain.

Instructions

Identify the user need, map the value chain of components required to meet it, and position each component on the evolution axis.

Output Format

Context: [What situation we're mapping] User: [Who the user is] User Need: [What they're trying to accomplish]


Value Chain Identification

Working backward from user need:

Component Depends On Visibility
[User Need] [what it requires] High (User-facing)
[Component A] [what it requires] High/Med/Low
[Component B] [what it requires] High/Med/Low
[Infrastructure] [base requirements] Low (Hidden)

Evolution Assessment

Component Evolution Stage Evidence
[Component A] Genesis / Custom / Product / Commodity [Why at this stage]
[Component B] Genesis / Custom / Product / Commodity [Why at this stage]

Evolution Indicators:

  • Genesis: Novel, poorly understood, no standard, high uncertainty
  • Custom: Emerging practices, divergent approaches, experimentation
  • Product: Feature differentiation, rental/purchase models, scalable
  • Commodity: Standardized, utility pricing, essential but undifferentiated

The Map

VISIBLE │
   TO   │  [User Need]
  USER  │       │
        │       ▼
        │  [Component A]
        │       │
        │       ▼
INVISIBLE│  [Component B]
        │
        └──────┬──────┬──────┬──────┬──────►
            GENESIS  CUSTOM PRODUCT COMMODITY
              I        II     III      IV

Movement Analysis

What's evolving rightward?

Component Current Stage Evolving Toward
[component] [stage] [next stage]

Inertia Points

  • [Component with inertia] — [why we might resist]

Strategic Analysis

Build vs. Buy

Component Recommendation Rationale
[Genesis/Custom] Build Differentiator
[Commodity] Buy Commodity, not differentiating

Competitive Dynamics

Our differentiators (left side of map):

  • [Component we do differently]

Commoditization threats:

  • [Component becoming commodity]

Recommendations

Short-term actions:

  1. [Action based on map insights]

What to stop doing:

  • [Component to outsource/buy instead of build]

Key Insight:

[Main strategic takeaway from the mapping exercise]

Guidelines

  • Always start with user need
  • Everything evolves left to right (genesis → commodity)
  • Build on the left (differentiation), buy on the right (commodity)
  • Watch for inertia—past success creates resistance to change

$ARGUMENTS