smithery/mtthsnc

use-plan-create

Use when you have a spec or requirements for a multi-step task, before touching code

Installation

$ npx skills add smithery/mtthsnc --skill use-plan-create

Similar popular skills

Related neighbors and high-traction skills in the same topics — useful to compare before installing.

Also in this package

Other skills from smithery/mtthsnc.

npx skills add smithery/mtthsnc

Browse all from smithery/mtthsnc

More details

Agent compatibility

Declared targets from SKILL.md / docs. Unmarked agents are not listed — the skill may still install via the CLI.

Claude Code Not declared
Cursor Not declared
Codex Not declared
GitHub Copilot Not declared
Windsurf Not declared
Gemini CLI Not declared
Cline Not declared
OpenCode Not declared

Package contents

Files included with this skill beyond the listing page.

  • skill md SKILL.md 2,877 B
  • docs SUMMARY.md 107 B

History

  1. First recorded snapshot · 0 installs

SKILL.md

Write comprehensive implementation plans assuming the engineer has zero context for the codebase. Document everything they need: which files to touch, code, testing, how to verify. Give them bite-sized tasks. DRY. YAGNI. TDD. Frequent commits.

Announce at start: "I'm using the use-plan-create skill to create the implementation plan."

Context: Run in a dedicated worktree (created by use-brainstorm skill).

Save plans to: docs/plans/YYYY-MM-DD-<feature-name>.md

Task Granularity

Each step is one action (2-5 minutes):

  • "Write the failing test" - step
  • "Run it to make sure it fails" - step
  • "Implement the minimal code to make the test pass" - step
  • "Run the tests and make sure they pass" - step
  • "Commit" - step

Plan Header

Every plan MUST start with:

# [Feature Name] Implementation Plan

> **For Claude:** REQUIRED SUB-SKILL: Use autonome:use-plan-execute to implement this plan task-by-task.

**Goal:** [One sentence describing what this builds]

**Architecture:** [2-3 sentences about approach]

**Tech Stack:** [Key technologies/libraries]

---

Task Structure

### Task N: [Component Name]

**Files:**
- Create: `exact/path/to/file.py`
- Modify: `exact/path/to/existing.py:123-145`
- Test: `tests/exact/path/to/test.py`

**Step 1: Write the failing test**

def testspecificbehavior(): result = function(input) assert result == expected


**Step 2: Run test to verify it fails**

Run: `pytest tests/path/test.py::test_name -v`
Expected: FAIL with "function not defined"

**Step 3: Write minimal implementation**

def function(input): return expected


**Step 4: Run test to verify it passes**

Run: `pytest tests/path/test.py::test_name -v`
Expected: PASS

**Step 5: Commit**

git add tests/path/test.py src/path/file.py git commit -m "feat: add specific feature"

Key Rules

  • Exact file paths always
  • Complete code in plan (not "add validation")
  • Exact commands with expected output
  • Reference relevant skills with @ syntax
  • DRY, YAGNI, TDD, frequent commits

Execution Handoff

After saving the plan, offer execution choice:

"Plan complete and saved to docs/plans/<filename>.md. Two execution options:

1. Subagent-Driven (this session) - I dispatch fresh subagent per task, review between tasks, fast iteration

2. Parallel Session (separate) - Open new session with plan-execute, batch execution with checkpoints

Which approach?"

If Subagent-Driven chosen:

  • Use autonome:use-subagents-dispatch
  • Stay in this session
  • Fresh subagent per task + code review

If Parallel Session chosen:

  • Guide them to open new session in worktree
  • New session uses autonome:plan-execute