smithery/majesticlabs-dev

skill-design-philosophy

Core philosophy for designing Claude Code skills - when to use skills vs agents, the knowledge test, and what makes skills valuable. Use when deciding component type or evaluating skill quality.

Installation

$ npx skills add smithery/majesticlabs-dev --skill skill-design-philosophy

Similar popular skills

Related neighbors and high-traction skills in the same topics — useful to compare before installing.

Also in this package

Other skills from smithery/majesticlabs-dev · top by installs.

npx skills add smithery/majesticlabs-dev

Browse all from smithery/majesticlabs-dev

More details

Agent compatibility

Declared targets from SKILL.md / docs. Unmarked agents are not listed — the skill may still install via the CLI.

Claude Code Declared
Cursor Not declared
Codex Not declared
GitHub Copilot Not declared
Windsurf Not declared
Gemini CLI Not declared
Cline Not declared
OpenCode Not declared

Skill metadata

Parsed from SKILL.md frontmatter.

Declared agents claude-code

Package contents

Files included with this skill beyond the listing page.

  • skill md SKILL.md 2,166 B
  • docs SUMMARY.md 225 B

History

  1. First recorded snapshot · 0 installs

SKILL.md

Skill Design Philosophy

Skills provide knowledge and context, not autonomous execution.

The Knowledge Test

Ask: "Does this TEACH Claude or DO something?"

TEACH (Skill) DO (Agent)
Coding conventions Run linters and fix code
Workflow methodology Execute multi-step processes
Framework patterns Generate reports
Tool usage guidance Fetch and analyze data

Rule: If it produces artifacts without user guidance, it's probably an agent.

Good Skill Examples

Skill Why It Works
dhh-coder Coding style guidance - patterns Claude applies when writing code
tdd-workflow Methodology knowledge - steps Claude follows for test-driven development
stimulus-coder Framework patterns - conventions Claude uses for Stimulus controllers
pdf-processing Tool knowledge - how to use specific libraries and scripts

Pattern: Skills TEACH Claude patterns, conventions, and approaches.

Bad Skill Examples

Skill Why It Fails
"Code reviewer" Does autonomous work - should be an agent
"Git helper" Vague scope - what specifically does it teach?
"Best practices" Too broad - not actionable
"Documentation generator" Creates artifacts - should be an agent

Pattern: These skills DO things instead of TEACHING things.

Content Rules

Include Exclude
Concrete patterns and conventions Persona statements ("You are an expert...")
Specific templates and examples Attribution ("Inspired by X...")
Decision criteria Decorative quotes
Error handling guidance ASCII art or box-drawing
Framework-specific idioms Vague "best practices"

Quality Test

"Does every line in this skill improve Claude's behavior?"

If any line is decorative, inspirational, or redundant - cut it.