smithery/jiunbae

proposal-analyzer

Analyzes business proposals and RFP documents, evaluating pricing, deadlines, and technical specifications for feasibility. Generates go/no-go reports. Use for proposal analysis, RFP review, bidding assessment, or business feasibility evaluation.

Installation

$ npx skills add smithery/jiunbae --skill analyzing-proposals

Similar popular skills

Related neighbors and high-traction skills in the same topics — useful to compare before installing.

Also in this package

Other skills from smithery/jiunbae · top by installs.

npx skills add smithery/jiunbae

Browse all from smithery/jiunbae

More details

Agent compatibility

Declared targets from SKILL.md / docs. Unmarked agents are not listed — the skill may still install via the CLI.

Claude Code Not declared
Cursor Not declared
Codex Not declared
GitHub Copilot Not declared
Windsurf Not declared
Gemini CLI Not declared
Cline Not declared
OpenCode Not declared

Package contents

Files included with this skill beyond the listing page.

  • skill md SKILL.md 1,909 B
  • docs SUMMARY.md 273 B

History

  1. First recorded snapshot · 0 installs

SKILL.md

Proposal Analyzer

Evaluate proposals and RFPs for feasibility.

Analysis Criteria

Aspect Evaluation
Budget Is pricing realistic? Competitive?
Timeline Achievable with resources?
Tech Specs Within capability? Risks?
Scope Clear? Complete? Ambiguous areas?
Terms Favorable? Red flags?

Workflow

Step 1: Document Extraction

Read proposal (PDF/DOCX) and extract:

  • Project name, client
  • Budget range
  • Timeline/milestones
  • Technical requirements
  • Terms & conditions

Step 2: Feasibility Check

For each requirement:

  • Can we deliver? (Y/N/Partial)
  • Required resources
  • Risk level (Low/Medium/High)

Step 3: Generate Report

# Proposal Analysis: {Project Name}

## Summary
- Client: {name}
- Budget: {amount}
- Duration: {timeline}
- Verdict: **GO** / **NO-GO** / **CONDITIONAL**

## Feasibility Matrix
| Requirement | Feasible | Risk | Notes |
|-------------|----------|------|-------|
| Feature A | ✅ | Low | Existing capability |
| Feature B | ⚠️ | Medium | Needs R&D |
| Feature C | ❌ | High | Outside expertise |

## Budget Analysis
- Estimated cost: {amount}
- Margin: {%}
- Competitive: Yes/No

## Timeline Assessment
- Realistic: Yes/No
- Buffer needed: {weeks}

## Recommendation
{Detailed recommendation with conditions}

Red Flags to Watch

  • Vague scope with fixed price
  • Unrealistic timeline
  • Unlimited revisions clause
  • IP ownership unclear
  • Penalty clauses

Best Practices

  • Always quantify risks
  • Compare with past similar projects
  • Identify negotiable terms