npx skills add https://modelscope.cn/skills/@majiayu000/code-auditing
smithery/jeffrigby
code-auditing
Systematic methodology for comprehensive codebase analysis — security review, technical debt identification, dead code detection, code quality checks, and best-practices verification against official library documentation.
Installation
npx skills add smithery/jeffrigby --skill code-auditing
Similar popular skills
Related neighbors and high-traction skills in the same topics — useful to compare before installing.
Use for Azure AI: Search, Speech, OpenAI, Document Intelligence. Helps with search, vector/hybr…
568.2K installsUse this skill any time a .pptx or .potx file is involved in any way — as input, output, or bot…
216.8K installsUse this skill whenever the user wants to do anything with PDF files. This includes reading or …
192.4K installsUse this skill whenever the user wants to create, read, edit, or manipulate Word documents (.do…
184.5K installsUse this skill any time a spreadsheet file is the primary input or output. This means any task …
165K installsMore details
Agent compatibility
Declared targets from SKILL.md / docs. Unmarked agents are not listed — the skill may still install via the CLI.
Also listed on
Alternate registries and mirrors of this skill.
Skill metadata
Parsed from SKILL.md frontmatter.
Read, Grep, Glob, Bash, WebSearch, WebFetchPackage contents
Files included with this skill beyond the listing page.
-
skill md
SKILL.md4,839 B -
docs
SUMMARY.md239 B
History
- First recorded snapshot · 0 installs
SKILL.md
Code Auditing Skill
Comprehensive methodology for systematic code quality audits.
When to Use
- Comprehensive code quality audits
- Security vulnerability assessments
- Technical debt identification
- Pre-release code reviews
- Best practices verification
- Library and dependency audits
Audit Phases
Phase 0: Pre-Analysis Setup
- Check for project configuration files (package.json, tsconfig.json, etc.)
- Identify tech stack and main libraries
- Check for linting/formatting configs
- Run existing linting/testing commands as baseline
- Load documentation for identified core libraries
Phase 1: Discovery
- Find all code files by type
- Create tracking list for each file
- Group files by module/feature for contextual analysis
Phase 2: File-by-File Analysis
For each file, analyze for:
- Dead code (unused functions, variables, imports)
- Code smells and anti-patterns
- Custom implementations that could use established libraries
- Security vulnerabilities
- Performance issues
- Outdated patterns or deprecated APIs
- Missing error handling
- Overly complex functions
- Duplicate code
Phase 3: Best Practices Verification
For every library and framework:
- Retrieve official documentation
- Compare implementation against official patterns
- Identify deviations from recommendations
- Note outdated usage patterns
- Flag discouraged anti-patterns
Phase 4: Pattern Detection
Look for recurring issues:
- Common anti-patterns across files
- Duplicated logic that could be abstracted
- Inconsistent coding styles
- Missing error handling patterns
Phase 5: Library Recommendations
For custom implementations:
- Check if current libraries provide the functionality
- Search for mature ecosystem packages
- Verify library health (commits, issues, activity)
- Check compatibility with project setup
Phase 6: Comprehensive Report
Generate detailed report with:
- Executive summary
- Critical issues requiring immediate attention
- File-by-file findings
- Prioritized action plan
- Effort estimates
- Library recommendations
Issue Priority Levels
- Critical - Security vulnerabilities, broken functionality
- High Priority - Performance bottlenecks, unmaintainable code
- Medium Priority - Code quality, best practices deviations
- Low Priority - Style, minor improvements
- Quick Wins - Less than 30 minutes to fix
Analysis Categories
Security
- Hardcoded secrets
- SQL injection risks
- XSS vulnerabilities
- Missing input validation
- Exposed sensitive data
Performance
- Inefficient algorithms
- Blocking operations
- Memory leaks
- Missing caching opportunities
- N+1 query patterns
TypeScript/Type Safety
- Missing type annotations
- Use of
anytype - Custom types duplicating official types
- Missing @types packages
Async/Promise Issues
- Missing await keywords
- Unhandled promise rejections
- Callback hell
Dead Code
- Unused imports and exports
- Unused functions, classes, and methods
- Unused variables and types
- Unreachable code blocks
- Unused files (not imported anywhere)
- Unused dependencies
Tools:
- JavaScript/TypeScript:
npx knip --reporter json - Python:
deadcode . --dry
Important: Always verify tool findings before reporting. Check for:
- Dynamic imports (
import(variable)) - Framework patterns (React components, decorators)
- Re-exports for public API
- Entry points (CLI scripts, serverless handlers)
Resources
See the reference documents for complete methodologies:
${CLAUDESKILLDIR}/references/audit-methodology.md- Full 6-phase audit process with detailed checklists${CLAUDESKILLDIR}/references/dead-code-methodology.md- Dead code detection tools, verification, and cleanup workflows
Quick Reference
Before Starting
- Read project configuration files
- Identify tech stack and libraries
- Run existing linters as baseline
- Create file tracking list
During Audit
- Mark files as in-progress
- Analyze each category systematically
- Note specific line numbers
- Document before/after examples
- Mark files as completed
After Audit
- Categorize all findings by priority
- Generate comprehensive report
- Save report to project root
- Provide brief console summary