smithery/dasien

Test Coverage Analysis

Measure and improve test coverage by identifying untested code paths and prioritizing high-risk areas for testing

Installation

$ npx skills add smithery/dasien --skill test-coverage-analysis

Similar popular skills

Related neighbors and high-traction skills in the same topics — useful to compare before installing.

Also in this package

Other skills from smithery/dasien.

npx skills add smithery/dasien

Browse all from smithery/dasien

More details

Agent compatibility

Declared targets from SKILL.md / docs. Unmarked agents are not listed — the skill may still install via the CLI.

Claude Code Not declared
Cursor Not declared
Codex Not declared
GitHub Copilot Not declared
Windsurf Not declared
Gemini CLI Not declared
Cline Not declared
OpenCode Not declared

Package contents

Files included with this skill beyond the listing page.

  • skill md SKILL.md 1,532 B
  • docs SUMMARY.md 143 B

History

  1. First recorded snapshot · 0 installs

SKILL.md

Test Coverage Analysis

Purpose

Measure and improve test coverage to ensure code is adequately tested and identify untested areas that may contain bugs.

When to Use

  • Evaluating test suite quality
  • Identifying untested code paths
  • Setting testing goals
  • Validating test completeness

Key Capabilities

  1. Coverage Measurement - Run coverage tools and interpret results
  2. Gap Analysis - Identify critical untested code
  3. Prioritization - Focus on high-risk areas first

Approach

  1. Run coverage tool on test suite
  2. Review coverage report (line, branch, function coverage)
  3. Identify uncovered critical paths
  4. Prioritize based on risk and complexity
  5. Write tests for important gaps
  6. Re-run coverage to validate improvement

Example

Context: Coverage report shows 75% line coverage ```` Analysis:

  • Core business logic: 95% covered ✓
  • Error handling: 45% covered ⚠️
  • Edge cases: 30% covered ⚠️
  • UI code: 60% covered

Priority:

  1. Add tests for error handling (high risk)
  2. Cover common edge cases
  3. UI testing (lower priority)

````

Best Practices

  • ✅ Aim for 80%+ coverage on critical code
  • ✅ Focus on meaningful tests, not just coverage numbers
  • ✅ Test edge cases and error paths
  • ❌ Avoid: Chasing 100% coverage on trivial code