smithery/carlo-spada

validate-sibling-dependency

Validate Sibling Dependency Law (ADR-020) for Xentri architecture.

Installation

$ npx skills add smithery/carlo-spada --skill validate-sibling-dependency

Summary

  • Validate Sibling Dependency Law (ADR-020) for Xentri architecture.
  • Use when checking module dependencies, creating new requirements, adding interfaces between entities, or reviewing cross-module relationships.
  • Enforces that entities can only depend on siblings (same parent) and cross-branch access must be declared at common ancestor level.

Similar popular skills

Related neighbors and high-traction skills in the same topics — useful to compare before installing.

Also in this package

Other skills from smithery/carlo-spada.

npx skills add smithery/carlo-spada

Browse all from smithery/carlo-spada

More details

Agent compatibility

Declared targets from SKILL.md / docs. Unmarked agents are not listed — the skill may still install via the CLI.

Claude Code Not declared
Cursor Not declared
Codex Not declared
GitHub Copilot Not declared
Windsurf Not declared
Gemini CLI Not declared
Cline Not declared
OpenCode Not declared

Package contents

Files included with this skill beyond the listing page.

  • skill md SKILL.md 3,369 B
  • docs SUMMARY.md 376 B

History

  1. First recorded snapshot · 0 installs

SKILL.md

Validate Sibling Dependency Law (ADR-020)

Purpose

Enforces the Sibling Dependency Law — a critical architectural constraint that prevents dependency spaghetti in the Xentri documentation hierarchy.

Core Rules

  1. Single-Parent Inheritance: Every entity has exactly ONE parent, encoded in its requirement ID
  2. Sibling-Only Dependencies: requires_interfaces can only reference siblings (nodes with same parent)
  3. Inherited Access: Cross-branch dependencies must be declared at the common ancestor level
  4. Violation = Redesign: If validation fails, STOP and redesign — do not create workarounds

Quick Validation

Run this command to check for violations:

pnpm exec tsx scripts/validation/validate-dependencies.ts --path docs

Decision Tree

Is Target a sibling of Source? (same direct parent)
│
├─ YES → ✅ VALID: Declare requires_interfaces directly
│
└─ NO → Find common ancestor
        │
        ├─ Ancestor already has access? → ✅ Use inherited_interfaces
        │
        └─ Ancestor lacks access?
            │
            ├─ Can ancestor declare it? → Bubble up the dependency
            │
            └─ Structural problem? → Redesign required (or ADR exception)

Examples

✅ Valid: Sibling Dependency

# God-View depends on KPI-Center (both children of Pulse)
Source: docs/strategy/pulse/god-view/
Target: docs/strategy/pulse/kpi-center/
Result: VALID — same parent (Pulse)

❌ Invalid: Cross-Branch Dependency

# God-View trying to depend directly on Shell
Source: docs/strategy/pulse/god-view/
Target: docs/platform/shell/
Result: INVALID — different branches (Strategy vs Platform)
Resolution: Strategy must declare dependency on Shell; God-View inherits

✅ Valid: Inherited Access

# God-View using Core-API via Constitution-level declaration
Source: docs/strategy/pulse/god-view/
Target: docs/platform/core-api/
Context: Constitution (docs/platform/) declares IC-API-001
Result: VALID via inheritance

When to Use This Skill

Claude will automatically invoke this skill when you:

  • Ask about module dependencies
  • Create new requires_interfaces declarations
  • Review architecture for dependency violations
  • Add interfaces between entities
  • Mention "ADR-020", "sibling dependency", or "cross-module dependency"

Resolution Options

When a violation is detected:

  1. Bubble Up: Declare the dependency at the common ancestor level
  2. Redesign: Restructure entities to be siblings, or use events instead
  3. Exception (last resort): Create ADR documenting the exception with remediation plan

Full Documentation

See docs/platform/architecture/adr-020-sibling-dependency-law.md for complete specification including:

  • Requirement file format
  • Dependency resolution algorithm
  • Escape hatch for exceptions
  • Enforcement mechanisms (CI, pre-commit, review)