smithery/MadAppGang

performance-correlation

Correlate content attributes with GA4 and GSC metrics to identify performance drivers

Installation

$ npx skills add smithery/MadAppGang --skill performance-correlation

Similar popular skills

Related neighbors and high-traction skills in the same topics — useful to compare before installing.

Also in this package

Other skills from smithery/MadAppGang · top by installs.

npx skills add smithery/MadAppGang

Browse all from smithery/MadAppGang

More details

Agent compatibility

Declared targets from SKILL.md / docs. Unmarked agents are not listed — the skill may still install via the CLI.

Claude Code Not declared
Cursor Not declared
Codex Not declared
GitHub Copilot Not declared
Windsurf Not declared
Gemini CLI Not declared
Cline Not declared
OpenCode Not declared

Package contents

Files included with this skill beyond the listing page.

  • skill md SKILL.md 7,791 B
  • docs SUMMARY.md 116 B

History

  1. First recorded snapshot · 0 installs

SKILL.md

plugin: seo updated: 2026-01-20

Performance Correlation

When to Use

  • Connecting content changes to metric changes
  • Identifying what drives performance
  • Building optimization hypotheses
  • A/B test analysis
  • Content audit findings

Cross-Source Correlation Patterns

Pattern Library

Pattern 1: High Impressions + Low CTR + Good Position

GSC: Impressions ↑ | CTR ↓ | Position 3-7
GA4: N/A (users don't click)

Diagnosis: Title/meta description not compelling enough

Evidence Needed:

  • Compare your snippet to competitors in positions 1-2
  • Check for SERP features stealing attention
  • Analyze query intent match

Recommended Actions:

  1. Rewrite title with power words, numbers, or year
  2. Add compelling meta description with clear benefit
  3. Target featured snippet if applicable

Expected Impact: +50-100% CTR improvement possible


plugin: seo updated: 2026-01-20

Pattern 2: High CTR + Low Engagement

GSC: CTR ↑ | Position stable
GA4: Bounce ↑ | Time on Page ↓ | Scroll Depth ↓

Diagnosis: Content doesn't match search intent or promise

Evidence Needed:

  • Compare content to search query expectations
  • Check if title oversells/misleads
  • Analyze competing content that ranks

Recommended Actions:

  1. Align content opening with search intent
  2. Deliver promised value in first 100 words
  3. Add table of contents for scanners

Expected Impact: -20-30% bounce rate, +50% time on page


plugin: seo updated: 2026-01-20

Pattern 3: High Engagement + Low Rankings

GA4: Time on Page ↑ | Bounce ↓ | Scroll Depth ↑
GSC: Position ↓ | Impressions ↓

Diagnosis: Good content but weak SEO signals

Evidence Needed:

  • Check backlink profile vs competitors
  • Analyze internal linking to this page
  • Review technical SEO factors

Recommended Actions:

  1. Build quality backlinks to page
  2. Add internal links from high-authority pages
  3. Improve on-page SEO (keyword density, headers)

Expected Impact: +5-15 position improvement over 2-3 months


plugin: seo updated: 2026-01-20

Pattern 4: Declining Rankings + Stable Traffic

GSC: Position ↓ | Impressions → | Clicks → (or slight ↓)
GA4: Traffic → (from brand/direct)

Diagnosis: Competitors advancing, brand queries protecting you

Evidence Needed:

  • Competitor content comparison
  • Content freshness analysis
  • Backlink velocity comparison

Recommended Actions:

  1. Content refresh with updated data/examples
  2. Add new sections competitors have
  3. Accelerate link building

Expected Impact: Prevent further decline, regain positions


plugin: seo updated: 2026-01-20

Pattern 5: Good Rankings + Low Impressions

GSC: Position 1-5 | Impressions ↓ | CTR normal
GA4: Traffic ↓

Diagnosis: Keyword losing search volume

Evidence Needed:

  • Google Trends for keyword
  • Seasonal patterns analysis
  • Industry shifts

Recommended Actions:

  1. Target related growing keywords
  2. Expand content for related queries
  3. Consider pivoting topic angle

Expected Impact: Capture adjacent search demand


plugin: seo updated: 2026-01-20

Pattern 6: Position Volatility

GSC: Position fluctuates ±10 daily

Diagnosis: Google testing your content, or thin content threshold

Evidence Needed:

  • Content depth vs competitors
  • E-E-A-T signals present
  • Page experience metrics

Recommended Actions:

  1. Strengthen E-E-A-T signals
  2. Add depth and originality
  3. Improve page experience

Expected Impact: Position stabilization within 2-4 weeks

Correlation Matrix Template

Content Changes Timeline

Track all modifications to correlate with metrics:

## Content Change Log: {URL}

| Date | Change Type | Description | Scope |
|------|-------------|-------------|-------|
| 2025-12-01 | Content | Added 500 words on AI SEO | Major |
| 2025-12-10 | Meta | Updated title tag | Minor |
| 2025-12-15 | Links | Added 3 internal links | Minor |
| 2025-12-20 | Technical | Improved page speed | Technical |

Metric Response Timeline

Map metric changes to content changes:

## Metric Response Analysis

| Date | Metric | Before | After | Change | Likely Cause |
|------|--------|--------|-------|--------|--------------|
| Dec 5 | Position | 8.2 | 6.1 | +2.1 | Content expansion |
| Dec 12 | CTR | 2.1% | 3.8% | +1.7pp | Title update |
| Dec 18 | Time on Page | 2:10 | 3:45 | +1:35 | Content depth |
| Dec 22 | LCP | 2.8s | 1.9s | -0.9s | Speed optimization |

Correlation Confidence

Rate confidence in cause-effect relationships:

## Correlation Confidence Assessment

| Change | Metric Impact | Confidence | Reasoning |
|--------|---------------|------------|-----------|
| +500 words | Position +2.1 | HIGH | Timing matches, logical connection |
| Title update | CTR +1.7pp | HIGH | Direct relationship, immediate effect |
| Internal links | ? | LOW | Too recent, effect delayed |
| Speed fix | Bounce -5% | MEDIUM | Timing matches, indirect relationship |

Multi-Source Correlation

Unified Performance View

## Cross-Platform Correlation: {URL}

### Traffic & Visibility
| Source | Metric | Value | Trend | Correlation |
|--------|--------|-------|-------|-------------|
| GSC | Impressions | 15,200 | ↑ +12% | Search visibility growing |
| GSC | Clicks | 428 | ↑ +8% | Traffic following visibility |
| GA4 | Sessions | 512 | ↑ +10% | Confirms GSC data |

### Engagement Quality
| Source | Metric | Value | Trend | Correlation |
|--------|--------|-------|-------|-------------|
| GSC | CTR | 2.8% | → stable | Snippet unchanged |
| GA4 | Bounce Rate | 38% | ↓ -4% | Content improvements working |
| GA4 | Avg Time | 3:42 | ↑ +0:45 | Users more engaged |
| GA4 | Scroll Depth | 72% | ↑ +8% | Content structure improved |

### Ranking Performance
| Source | Keyword | Position | Change | Opportunity |
|--------|---------|----------|--------|-------------|
| GSC | seo guide | 4 | +2 | Target position 1-3 |
| GSC | seo best practices | 7 | +1 | Content gap vs leader |
| GSC | seo tips 2025 | 12 | -3 | Needs freshness update |

Hypothesis Building

Template

## Optimization Hypothesis

**Observation**: {what the data shows}

**Hypothesis**: {proposed cause-effect relationship}

**Test Plan**:
1. {specific change to make}
2. {metrics to monitor}
3. {timeframe for evaluation}

**Success Criteria**:
- Primary: {main metric target}
- Secondary: {supporting metric targets}

**Risk Assessment**:
- Probability of success: {HIGH|MEDIUM|LOW}
- Potential downside: {risk description}
- Mitigation: {how to minimize risk}

Example Hypothesis

## Optimization Hypothesis: CTR Improvement

**Observation**: Page ranks #4 for "seo guide 2025" with 15K monthly
impressions but only 2.8% CTR (below 5% benchmark).

**Hypothesis**: Updating title to include "Complete" and current year
will increase CTR by appealing to users seeking comprehensive, fresh content.

**Test Plan**:
1. Change title from "SEO Guide: Tips for Success" to
   "Complete SEO Guide 2025: 15 Proven Strategies"
2. Monitor: CTR, impressions, position, clicks
3. Evaluate after 2 weeks of data

**Success Criteria**:
- Primary: CTR increases from 2.8% to >4%
- Secondary: Clicks increase by >30%
- Position maintains or improves

**Risk Assessment**:
- Probability of success: HIGH (title changes typically show results)
- Potential downside: Slight position fluctuation during testing
- Mitigation: Don't change other page elements simultaneously