smithery/LerianStudio

ring:test-driven-development

Enforcing the RED-GREEN-REFACTOR loop: write one failing test and watch it fail, write minimal code to pass, then refactor green.

Installation

$ npx skills add smithery/LerianStudio --skill ringtest-driven-development

Summary

  • Enforcing the RED-GREEN-REFACTOR loop: write one failing test and watch it fail, write minimal code to pass, then refactor green.
  • Use when starting implementation of a new feature or bugfix, or writing any new production code.
  • Requires pasted failure output as proof of RED; code written before its test must be deleted, not stashed.
  • Skip for exploratory spikes or when only modifying existing tests.

Similar popular skills

Related neighbors and high-traction skills in the same topics — useful to compare before installing.

Also in this package

Other skills from smithery/LerianStudio.

npx skills add smithery/LerianStudio

Browse all from smithery/LerianStudio

More details

Agent compatibility

Declared targets from SKILL.md / docs. Unmarked agents are not listed — the skill may still install via the CLI.

Claude Code Not declared
Cursor Not declared
Codex Not declared
GitHub Copilot Not declared
Windsurf Not declared
Gemini CLI Not declared
Cline Not declared
OpenCode Not declared

Package contents

Files included with this skill beyond the listing page.

  • skill md SKILL.md 4,027 B
  • docs SUMMARY.md 188 B

History

  1. First recorded snapshot · 0 installs

SKILL.md

Test-Driven Development (TDD)

When to use

  • Starting implementation of new feature
  • Starting implementation of bugfix
  • Writing new production code

Skip when

  • Reviewing/modifying existing tests
  • Exploratory/spike work — TDD is for known requirements, not exploration.

Write the test first. Watch it fail. Write minimal code to pass.

Core principle: If you didn't watch the test fail, you don't know if it tests the right thing.

The Iron Law

NO PRODUCTION CODE WITHOUT A FAILING TEST FIRST

RED → GREEN → REFACTOR

RED: Write Failing Test

Write one minimal test showing what should happen. Name describes behavior. Tests real code (not mocks unless unavoidable).

Time limit: <5 minutes. Complex setup = design too complex.

# Run test — MANDATORY. Never skip.
npm test path/to/test.test.ts   # or go test ./... | pytest

Paste the actual failure output. No output = violation.

Test Type Expected Failure
New feature NameError: function not defined or AttributeError
Bug fix Actual wrong output/behavior

Test passes immediately? You're testing existing behavior — fix the test.

GREEN: Minimal Code

Write simplest code to pass the test. Nothing more. No extra features, no refactoring unrelated code.

Run test → confirm passes → confirm other tests still pass.

REFACTOR: Clean Up

After green only. Remove duplication, improve names. Keep tests green. Don't add behavior.

Repeat

Next failing test for next feature.

Violation: Code Written Before Test

Only one action: DELETE IT. Immediately.

rm <files>                                  # remove new files
git restore --staged --worktree <files>     # discard changes to tracked files
# Destructive operations (e.g., git reset --hard) require user confirmation.

Delete means gone forever. These are NOT deleting: git stash, mv to .bak, commenting out, keeping as "reference."

No asking permission. No alternatives. No exceptions.

  • Deadline? Delete, communicate delay, do it right.
  • 4 hours of work? Sunk cost fallacy. Delete.
  • Manager pressure? Delete, explain TDD prevents bugs.

Then start over with TDD.

Good Test Qualities

Quality Good Bad
Minimal One thing ("and" in name = split) test('validates email and domain and whitespace')
Clear Describes behavior test('test1')
Fails correctly Expected failure matches missing feature Test errors out from typo

Verification Checklist

Before marking work complete:

  • Every new function/method has a test
  • Watched each test fail before implementing
  • Each test failed for expected reason (feature missing, not typo)
  • Wrote minimal code to pass each test
  • All tests pass, output pristine
  • Edge cases and errors covered

When Stuck

Problem Solution
Don't know how to test Write wished-for API first, then assertion
Test too complicated Design too complicated — simplify interface
Must mock everything Code too coupled — use dependency injection
Test setup huge Extract helpers; still complex = simplify design

Bug Fix TDD

Write failing test reproducing the bug. Follow TDD cycle. Never fix bugs without a test.

<example> Bug: empty email accepted RED: test('rejects empty email') → FAIL: expected 'Email required', got undefined GREEN: if (!data.email?.trim()) return { error: 'Email required' } VERIFY: PASS </example>