smithery/HeshamFS

simulation-validator

Validate simulations across three stages — run pre-flight checks on configuration files (parameter ranges, required fields, disk space), monitor runtime logs for residual growth, NaN/Inf, and adaptive dt collapse, and perform post-flight validation of results (physical bounds, mass/energy conservation, convergence). Diagnose failed simulations with probable-cause analysis and recommended fixes. Use when preparing to launch a simulation, checking whether a running job is healthy, verifying that …

Installation

$ npx skills add smithery/HeshamFS --skill simulation-validator

Similar popular skills

Related neighbors and high-traction skills in the same topics — useful to compare before installing.

Also in this package

Other skills from smithery/HeshamFS.

npx skills add smithery/HeshamFS

Browse all from smithery/HeshamFS

More details

Agent compatibility

Declared targets from SKILL.md / docs. Unmarked agents are not listed — the skill may still install via the CLI.

Claude Code Declared
Cursor Not declared
Codex Not declared
GitHub Copilot Not declared
Windsurf Not declared
Gemini CLI Not declared
Cline Not declared
OpenCode Not declared

Skill metadata

Parsed from SKILL.md frontmatter.

Version1.2.2
Allowed toolsRead, Bash, Write, Grep, Glob
Declared agents claude-code
More metadata
author
HeshamFS
version
1.2.2
security_tier
high
security_reviewed
1
tested_with
["claude-code"]
last_evaluated
2026-06-24
eval_cases
5
last_reviewed
2026-06-23
standards
["Courant-Friedrichs-Lewy (CFL) stability condition (Courant, Friedrichs & Lewy, 1928)","von Neumann stability analysis (diffusion-Fourier number limit dt <= dx^2\/(2*D*dim))","IEEE 754 floating-point arithmetic (NaN \/ Inf \/ overflow detection)","Variational \/ gradient-flow energy dissipation for Allen-Cahn and Cahn-Hilliard phase-field models","Conservation laws (mass \/ energy \/ momentum drift checks)"]

Package contents

Files included with this skill beyond the listing page.

  • skill md SKILL.md 16,252 B
  • docs SUMMARY.md 264 B

History

  1. First recorded snapshot · 0 installs

SKILL.md

Simulation Validator

Goal

Provide a three-stage validation protocol: pre-flight checks, runtime monitoring, and post-flight validation for materials simulations.

Requirements

  • Python 3.10+
  • No external dependencies (uses Python standard library only)
  • Works on Linux, macOS, and Windows

Inputs to Gather

Before running validation scripts, collect from the user:

Input Description Example
Config file Simulation configuration (JSON/YAML) simulation.json
Log file Runtime output log simulation.log
Metrics file Post-run metrics (JSON) results.json
Required params Parameters that must exist dt,dx,kappa
Valid ranges Parameter bounds dt:1e-6:1e-2

Decision Guidance

When to Run Each Stage

Is simulation about to start?
├── YES → Run Stage 1: preflight_checker.py
│         └── BLOCK status? → Fix issues, do NOT run simulation
│         └── WARN status? → Review warnings, document if accepted
│         └── PASS status? → Proceed to run simulation
│
Is simulation running?
├── YES → Run Stage 2: runtime_monitor.py (periodically)
│         └── Alerts? → Consider stopping, check parameters
│
Has simulation finished?
├── YES → Run Stage 3: result_validator.py
│         └── Failed checks? → Do NOT use results
│                            → Run failure_diagnoser.py
│         └── All passed? → Results are valid

Choosing Validation Thresholds

Metric Conservative Standard Relaxed
Mass tolerance 1e-6 1e-3 1e-2
Residual growth 2x 10x 100x
dt reduction 10x 100x 1000x

Script Outputs (JSON Fields)

Script Output Fields
scripts/preflight_checker.py report.status, report.blockers, report.warnings
scripts/runtime_monitor.py alerts, residualstats, dtstats (alerts include NaN/Inf/overflow detection, residual growth, and dt collapse)
scripts/result_validator.py checks, confidencescore, failedchecks, status (PASS / FAIL / INSUFFICIENTDATA); confidencescore is null when no check ran
scripts/failure_diagnoser.py probablecauses, recommendedfixes

Three-Stage Validation Protocol

Stage 1: Pre-flight (Before Simulation)

  1. Run scripts/preflight_checker.py --config simulation.json
  2. BLOCK status: Stop immediately, fix all blocker issues
  3. WARN status: Review warnings, document accepted risks
  4. PASS status: Proceed to simulation

Note: preflight_checker.py validates required keys, numeric ranges,
output-directory access, and disk space. It does not evaluate numerical
stability (CFL / diffusion-Fourier). For explicit stability gating use
skills/core-numerical/numerical-stability/scripts/cfl_checker.py.

python3 scripts/preflight_checker.py \
    --config simulation.json \
    --required dt,dx,kappa \
    --ranges "dt:1e-6:1e-2,dx:1e-4:1e-1" \
    --min-free-gb 1.0 \
    --json

Stage 2: Runtime (During Simulation)

  1. Run scripts/runtime_monitor.py --log simulation.log periodically
  2. Configure alert thresholds based on problem type
  3. Stop simulation if critical alerts appear
python3 scripts/runtime_monitor.py \
    --log simulation.log \
    --residual-growth 10.0 \
    --dt-drop 100.0 \
    --json

Stage 3: Post-flight (After Simulation)

  1. Run scripts/result_validator.py --metrics results.json
  2. All checks PASS: Results are valid for analysis
  3. Any check FAIL: Do NOT use results, diagnose failure
python3 scripts/result_validator.py \
    --metrics results.json \
    --bound-min 0.0 \
    --bound-max 1.0 \
    --mass-tol 1e-3 \
    --json

For variational / gradient-flow models (Allen-Cahn, Cahn-Hilliard), add --variational to enforce a strict monotone non-increasing energy check.

Failure Diagnosis

When validation fails:

python3 scripts/failure_diagnoser.py --log simulation.log --json

Conversational Workflow Example

User: My phase field simulation crashed after 1000 steps. Can you help me figure out why?

Agent workflow:

  1. First, check the log for obvious errors:

``bash python3 scripts/failure_diagnoser.py --log simulation.log --json ``

  1. If diagnosis suggests numerical blow-up, check runtime stats:

``bash python3 scripts/runtime_monitor.py --log simulation.log --json ``

  1. Recommend fixes based on findings:

- If residual grew rapidly → reduce time step - If dt collapsed → check stability conditions - If NaN detected → check initial conditions

Error Handling

Error Cause Resolution
Config not found File path invalid Verify config path exists
Non-numeric value Parameter is not a number Fix config file format
out of range Parameter outside bounds Adjust parameter or bounds
Output directory not writable Permission issue Check directory permissions
Insufficient disk space at <path> Disk nearly full on the output volume Free up space or reduce output
Invalid parameter name --required name has disallowed characters Use only letters, digits, _, ., -
range max ... must be greater than min Inverted/degenerate --ranges or bounds Ensure max > min
must be a finite positive number nan/inf/negative threshold supplied Pass a finite positive value
Log file too large Log exceeds the 500 MB parse cap Truncate or pre-filter the log

Interpretation Guidance

Status Meanings

Status Meaning Action
PASS All checks passed Proceed with confidence
WARN Non-critical issues found Review and document
BLOCK Critical issues found Must fix before proceeding

Confidence Score Interpretation

Score Meaning
1.0 All validation checks passed → proceed with confidence
0.75+ Most checks passed, minor issues
0.5-0.75 Significant issues, review carefully
< 0.5 Major problems, do not trust results
null (status INSUFFICIENT_DATA) No recognized metrics fields; no check ran — NOT a pass. Inspect the metrics file.

A requested bound (--bound-min/--bound-max) with no matching fieldmin/fieldmax in the metrics is reported as a failed boundsunverifiable check, never a vacuous pass. For variational/gradient-flow runs, pass --variational (or set "energyvariational": true in the metrics) to enforce a strict monotone non-increasing energy check (energymonotone); otherwise a weaker energynet_decrease check is used, which does not detect mid-run spikes.

Common Failure Patterns

Pattern in Log Likely Cause Recommended Fix
NaN, Inf, overflow Numerical instability Reduce dt, increase damping
max iterations, did not converge Solver failure Tune preconditioner, tolerances
out of memory Memory exhaustion Reduce mesh, enable out-of-core
dt reduced Adaptive stepping triggered May be okay if controlled

Verification checklist

Do not trust a validation verdict until each applicable item below is satisfied with the concrete artifact named. Record these in your summary to the user.

  • Ran resultvalidator.py --json and confirmed results.status is PASS (not INSUFFICIENTDATA) AND results.confidencescore == 1.0; a null score or INSUFFICIENTDATA means no check ran — treat as unverified, not as a pass.
  • Listed results.checks and confirmed every requested check actually appears (e.g. massconserved, boundssatisfied, nonan, and energymonotone/energynetdecrease); confirmed results.failedchecks is empty and contains no boundsunverifiable entry (which means a requested bound had no fieldmin/fieldmax to compare against).
  • For variational/gradient-flow models (Allen-Cahn, Cahn-Hilliard), passed --variational (or set "energyvariational": true) so energymonotone is enforced; recorded that the weaker energynetdecrease was NOT relied on, since it cannot detect mid-run energy spikes.
  • Recorded the mass drift tolerance used (--mass-tol, default 1e-3) and confirmed it matches the Conservative/Standard/Relaxed column appropriate to the run; did not silently accept the default for a tight-conservation problem.
  • Ran runtimemonitor.py --json and recorded residualstats (min/max/last) and dt_stats; confirmed there are no alerts for NaN/Inf/overflow, residual growth above --residual-growth, or dt collapse below --dt-drop.
  • Confirmed numerical stability was gated separately via core-numerical/numerical-stability/scripts/cflchecker.py (CFL/Fourier limit) — preflightchecker.py does NOT evaluate CFL/Fourier and a PASS preflight says nothing about temporal/spatial stability.
  • On any FAIL or alert, ran failurediagnoser.py --json and recorded the probablecauses/recommended_fixes, rather than reusing the results.

Common pitfalls & rationalizations

Tempting shortcut Why it's wrong / what to do
"Preflight passed, so the run is numerically stable." preflightchecker.py checks required keys, ranges, output-dir writability, and disk space only. It does NOT compute CFL/Fourier. Gate stability with cflchecker.py separately.
"result_validator printed a confidence score, so results are good." An empty or unrecognized metrics file returns confidencescore: null and status INSUFFICIENTDATA — that is "no check ran", not a pass. Verify recognized fields are present and status == PASS.
"Energy ends lower than it started, so the dissipative run is fine." The default energynetdecrease only compares first vs last and misses mid-run spikes. For gradient-flow models use --variational to enforce the strict monotone energy_monotone check.
"I asked for bounds and didn't get a bounds_satisfied: false, so bounds hold." If fieldmin/fieldmax are absent the validator emits bounds_unverifiable (a FAILED check), never a vacuous pass. Ensure the metrics file actually carries the field extrema.
"The simulation finished without crashing, so the results are trustworthy." Run completion is not correctness. Verify mass conservation, energy behavior, physical bounds, and a clean runtime_monitor alert list before using results.
"dt got smaller during the run, so the solver is failing." runtimemonitor dt-collapse is direction-aware (running-max vs current) and only alerts past --dt-drop; a controlled adaptive ramp is expected. Check the actual dtstats and whether an alert fired.
"I'll just use the default thresholds." Defaults (--mass-tol 1e-3, --residual-growth 10, --dt-drop 100) are the Standard column; a conservation-critical problem needs the Conservative tolerances. Pick thresholds for the physics, then record them.

Security

Input Validation

  • Config file paths are validated for existence before parsing; non-existent paths produce clear errors (exit code 2)
  • --required parameter names are validated against a safe-character allowlist (^[A-Za-z0-9_.-]+$); names with shell metacharacters are rejected
  • --ranges entries are parsed as name:min:max with finite numeric bounds enforced and max > min required
  • --min-free-gb is validated as a finite positive number (negatives, zero, nan, inf rejected)
  • --residual-growth and --dt-drop thresholds are validated as finite positive numbers
  • --bound-min and --bound-max are validated as finite numbers (nan/inf rejected), and --bound-max > --bound-min is enforced; --mass-tol is validated as a finite positive number
  • Invalid input exits with code 2 and an explanatory message

File Access

  • preflight_checker.py reads a single user-specified config file (JSON/YAML) and checks disk space on the volume hosting the resolved output directory
  • runtime_monitor.py reads a single log file specified by --log; log files are size-limited (500 MB max) and rejected before parsing if larger
  • result_validator.py reads a single metrics file (JSON) specified by --metrics
  • failure_diagnoser.py reads a single log file specified by --log; log files are size-limited (500 MB max) before parsing
  • No scripts write to the filesystem; all output goes to stdout

Tool Restrictions

  • Read: Used to inspect script source, references, config files, and simulation logs
  • Bash: Used to execute the four Python validation scripts (preflightchecker.py, runtimemonitor.py, resultvalidator.py, failurediagnoser.py) with explicit argument lists
  • Write: Used to save validation reports; writes are scoped to the user's working directory
  • Grep/Glob: Used to locate log files, config files, and search references

Safety Measures

  • No eval(), exec(), or dynamic code generation
  • All subprocess calls use explicit argument lists (no shell=True)
  • failurediagnoser.py uses hardcoded, pre-compiled diagnostic regex patterns; runtimemonitor.py accepts optional --residual-pattern / --dt-pattern overrides that are compiled with re.compile (no eval) and applied only to the user's own log
  • Diagnostic strings emitted in output are drawn from the skill's fixed cause/fix table, not interpolated from raw log content

Limitations

  • Not a real-time monitor: Scripts analyze logs after-the-fact
  • Regex-based: Log parsing depends on pattern matching; may miss unusual formats
  • No automatic fixes: Scripts diagnose but don't modify simulations

References

  • references/validation_protocol.md - Detailed checklist and criteria
  • references/log_patterns.md - Common failure signatures and regex patterns

Version History

  • v1.2.2 (2026-06-24): Added a Verification checklist (evidence-based, tied to the four scripts' JSON outputs) and a Common pitfalls & rationalizations table to harden agent interpretation of validation verdicts.
  • v1.2.0 (2026-06-23): Corrected diagnostic regexes (no false convergence/blow-up on healthy logs), direction-aware dt-collapse detection, NaN/Inf scan in runtime monitor, strict variational energy check, non-vacuous bounds/confidence, config-relative output-dir + correct-volume disk check, and implemented the documented input-validation/file-size safeguards
  • v1.1.0 (2024-12-24): Enhanced documentation, decision guidance, Windows compatibility
  • v1.0.0: Initial release with 4 validation scripts