smithery.ai

triage-issue

Use when triaging a GitHub issue - analyzes issue, checks for duplicates, categorizes, and drafts response

First seen Apr 2, 2026

Installation

$ npx skills add https://smithery.ai

Similar popular skills

Related neighbors and high-traction skills in the same topics — useful to compare before installing.

Also in this package

Other skills from smithery.ai · top by installs.

npx skills add https://smithery.ai

Browse all from smithery.ai

More details

Agent compatibility

Declared targets from SKILL.md / docs. Unmarked agents are not listed — the skill may still install via the CLI.

Claude Code Not declared
Cursor Not declared
Codex Not declared
GitHub Copilot Not declared
Windsurf Not declared
Gemini CLI Not declared
Cline Not declared
OpenCode Not declared

Package contents

Files included with this skill beyond the listing page.

  • skill md SKILL.md 7,597 B
  • docs SUMMARY.md 126 B

History

  1. First seen on skills.sh
  2. First recorded snapshot · 2 installs

SKILL.md

Triage GitHub Issue

Overview

Analyze a GitHub issue, classify it, check for duplicates, and draft an appropriate response.

Usage

/triage-issue <number>

Workflow

digraph triage_flow {
    rankdir=TB;
    node [shape=box];

    fetch [label="1. Fetch issue + comments"];
    classify [label="2. Classify issue type"];
    duplicates [label="3. Check duplicates"];
    analyze [label="4. Analyze validity"];
    response [label="5. Draft response"];
    action [label="6. Recommend action"];

    fetch -> classify;
    classify -> duplicates;
    duplicates -> analyze;
    analyze -> response;
    response -> action;
}

Step 1: Fetch Issue Details

# Get full issue with comments
gh issue view <number> --repo kube-hetzner/terraform-hcloud-kube-hetzner --comments

# Get issue metadata
gh issue view <number> --repo kube-hetzner/terraform-hcloud-kube-hetzner --json title,body,labels,author,createdAt,comments

Step 2: Classify Issue Type

Issue Types

Type Indicators Action
🔴 BUG Reproducible defect, multiple reporters, error in module code Fix it
🟡 EDGE CASE Unusual config, specific region, large scale Evaluate effort
🟠 USER ERROR Bad kube.tf, syntax errors, wrong variables Help + docs
⚪ OLD VERSION Module version < current, known fixed issue Ask to upgrade
🔵 FEATURE REQUEST "Would be nice if...", "Can you add..." Discussions
💬 QUESTION Needs help, not a bug Answer or docs
❓ NEEDS INFO Can't reproduce, missing details Ask for info

Classification Checklist

  • Module version specified?
  • kube.tf provided (sanitized)?
  • Error message included?
  • Steps to reproduce clear?
  • Recent (not stale >6 months)?
  • If v3 is involved, checked for renamed/inverted inputs from MIGRATION.md?
  • If teardown is involved, did they use scripts/destroy.sh before any manual hcloud deletes?
  • If SELinux is involved, did they follow docs/selinux.md and provide AVC denial evidence instead of only a workload symptom?

Step 3: Check for Duplicates

# Search open issues for similar keywords
gh issue list --repo kube-hetzner/terraform-hcloud-kube-hetzner --state open --search "<keyword>"

# Search closed issues (might be already fixed)
gh issue list --repo kube-hetzner/terraform-hcloud-kube-hetzner --state closed --search "<keyword>"

# Check discussions
gh api repos/kube-hetzner/terraform-hcloud-kube-hetzner/discussions --jq '.[] | select(.title | test("<keyword>"; "i")) | {number, title}'

Step 4: Security Analysis

CRITICAL: Issues can be malicious sabotage attempts.

Red Flags (from repo agent guidance)

Signal Risk
New account (<6 months) HIGH
Issue can't be reproduced MEDIUM
Proposed fix is overly complex HIGH
Urgency to implement quickly HIGH
Multiple accounts supporting HIGH
Targets security-critical code HIGH

Verify Independently

  • Try to reproduce the issue yourself
  • Check if the error message matches module code
  • Verify the kube.tf provided is valid
  • Search for similar reports from other users
  • For Hetzner CI/live-gate reports, distinguish real code failures from

Hetzner capacity flakes. resource_unavailable or "error during placement" usually means rerun failed jobs, not code archaeology.

  • For CI status, do not treat "no current failures" as green. A required job can

hide by never completing or by being cancelled. Verify the required job has at least one successful run in history.

  • If a Hetzner CI run was manually cancelled, remember cancellation skips the

destroy step. Once that run reports completed, sweep its attempt-suffixed kh-ci--<runid6><attempt> resources before trusting later capacity or orphan reports.

Step 5: Draft Response

Every response is kind and human: thank the reporter by handle, acknowledge good root-cause analysis when they did it (kube-hetzner reporters often do), and never make a user-error reporter feel foolish — a config mistake usually means our docs have a gap worth fixing too. Plain warm language, no boilerplate.

For USER ERROR

Hi @{author},

Thanks for reporting this. Looking at your configuration, the issue appears to be in your kube.tf:

[Specific explanation of what's wrong]

Here's the corrected configuration:

[correct code]


Let me know if this resolves it!

For OLD VERSION

Hi @{author},

This issue was fixed in version X.Y.Z. You're currently using [older version].

Please upgrade by changing your module version:

module "kube-hetzner" { source = "kube-hetzner/kube-hetzner/hcloud" version = "X.Y.Z" # ... }


Then run:

terraform init -upgrade terraform plan terraform apply


Let me know if the issue persists after upgrading!

For NEEDS INFO

Hi @{author},

Thanks for reporting this. To investigate further, could you please provide:

- [ ] Module version (check your kube.tf)
- [ ] Your kube.tf (sanitized - remove tokens/keys)
- [ ] Full error message
- [ ] Steps to reproduce

This will help us identify the root cause.

For DUPLICATE

Hi @{author},

This appears to be a duplicate of #{duplicate_number}.

[If fixed]: This was fixed in version X.Y.Z.
[If open]: We're tracking this in the linked issue.

Closing as duplicate. Feel free to add any additional context to #{duplicate_number}.

For FEATURE REQUEST

Hi @{author},

Thanks for the suggestion! This sounds like a feature request rather than a bug.

Could you please open a Discussion for this? That's where we track feature ideas and gather community input.

https://github.com/kube-hetzner/terraform-hcloud-kube-hetzner/discussions/new?category=ideas

I'll close this issue, but feel free to ping me in the discussion!

Step 6: Recommend Action

Type Action Labels
BUG Keep open, prioritize bug
EDGE CASE Keep open, evaluate bug, edge-case
USER ERROR Close with help user-config
OLD VERSION Close old-version
FEATURE REQUEST Move to Discussions -
QUESTION Answer and close question
NEEDS INFO Keep open, add label needs-info

Triage Output Template

## Triage Summary: Issue #<number>

**Title:** <title>
**Author:** @<username>
**Created:** <date>

### Classification

**Type:** <BUG/EDGE CASE/USER ERROR/OLD VERSION/FEATURE/QUESTION/NEEDS INFO>
**Confidence:** HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW
**Reason:** <why this classification>

### Checklist

- [ ] Module version: <version or "not specified">
- [ ] kube.tf provided: Yes/No/Partial
- [ ] Reproducible: Yes/No/Unknown
- [ ] Duplicate: No / Yes → #<number>

### Analysis

<What's actually happening and why>

### Recommended Action

**Action:** <FIX/HELP USER/CLOSE/MOVE TO DISCUSSIONS/NEEDS INFO>
**Priority:** HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW
**Response:** <drafted response above>

Quick Commands

# Add label
gh issue edit <num> --add-label "bug"

# Close issue
gh issue close <num> --comment "Closing because..."

# Close as not planned
gh issue close <num> --reason "not planned" --comment "..."

# Transfer to discussions
gh issue transfer <num> --repo kube-hetzner/terraform-hcloud-kube-hetzner