Smart Routing Skill

Intelligent routing engine for the /toh smart command. Routes any natural language request to the right agent(s).

🧠 Routing Pipeline

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                    USER REQUEST                                 │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│                                                                 │
│  STEP 0: MEMORY CHECK (ALWAYS FIRST!)                          │
│  ├── Read .toh/memory/active.md                                │
│  ├── Read .toh/memory/summary.md                               │
│  ├── Read .toh/memory/decisions.md                             │
│  └── Build context understanding                               │
│                                                                 │
│  STEP 1: INTENT CLASSIFICATION                                 │
│  ├── Pattern matching (keywords, phrases)                      │
│  ├── Context inference (from memory)                           │
│  └── Scope detection (simple/complex)                          │
│                                                                 │
│  STEP 2: CONFIDENCE SCORING                                    │
│  ├── HIGH (80%+) → Direct execution                            │
│  ├── MEDIUM (50-80%) → Plan Agent first                        │
│  └── LOW (<50%) → Ask for clarification                        │
│                                                                 │
│  STEP 3: RUNTIME SURVEY (2-step — orchestration-protocol A)    │
│  ├── Identity: declared by loaded context file +               │
│  │   .toh/capabilities.json                                    │
│  └── Probe: teams env flag + version gates only                │
│                                                                 │
│  STEP 4: AGENT SELECTION & EXECUTION                           │
│  └── Route to appropriate agent(s)                             │
│                                                                 │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

📊 Intent Classification Matrix

Illustrative heuristics only — native agent-description matching makes the actual call (see /toh); do not compute or display confidence scores.

Primary Patterns → Agent Mapping

🎯 Confidence Scoring Algorithm

Illustrative heuristics only — native agent-description matching makes the actual call (see /toh); do not compute or display confidence scores.

interface ConfidenceFactors {
  keywordMatch: number;      // 0-40 points
  contextClarity: number;    // 0-30 points
  memorySupport: number;     // 0-20 points
  scopeDefinition: number;   // 0-10 points
}

function calculateConfidence(request: string, memory: Memory): number {
  let score = 0;
  
  // Keyword matching (0-40 points)
  // Strong match with primary patterns = 40
  // Partial match = 20
  // No match = 0
  score += keywordMatchScore(request);
  
  // Context clarity (0-30 points)
  // Specific page/component mentioned = 30
  // General area mentioned = 15
  // No specifics = 0
  score += contextClarityScore(request);
  
  // Memory support (0-20 points)
  // Request relates to active task = 20
  // Request relates to project = 10
  // No memory context = 0
  score += memorySupportScore(request, memory);
  
  // Scope definition (0-10 points)
  // Single clear task = 10
  // Multiple related tasks = 5
  // Unclear scope = 0
  score += scopeDefinitionScore(request);
  
  return score; // 0-100
}

// Thresholds
const HIGH_CONFIDENCE = 80;    // Execute directly
const MEDIUM_CONFIDENCE = 50;  // Route to Plan Agent
// Below 50 = Ask for clarification

🖥️ Runtime Survey (2-step — never guess the IDE)

Step 1 — Identity (declared)

Your runtime identity is declared by the platform context file that loaded you (CLAUDE.md = Claude Code · .cursor/rules/*.mdc = Cursor · AGENTS.md = Codex or ZCode, whichever the Runtime: line inside it names · .agents/rules/toh-framework.md = Antigravity · GEMINI.md = Gemini CLI, legacy). Confirm capabilities from .toh/capabilities.json (written by the installer). No detection heuristics — the identity is stated, not inferred.

Step 2 — Runtime probe (only what install time cannot know)

Probe exactly: the CLAUDECODEEXPERIMENTALAGENTTEAMS env flag, plus the Claude Code version gates for /goal and workflows. Nothing else.

Execution mode

Choose from the execution ladder in orchestration-protocol (Section B) — the full decision table lives there, once. Summary only:

• Claude Code → ladder: teams > subagents > sequential
• Cursor (2.4+) → native subagents in .cursor/agents/, one task at a time
• Antigravity → file-based subagents via invoke_subagent, one task at a time
• Codex / ZCode / Gemini (legacy) → sequential TOH LOOP in-session

🔄 Routing Decision Tree

Request arrives
      │
      ▼
┌─────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 1. Load Memory Context              │
└─────────────────────────────────────┘
      │
      ▼
┌─────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 2. Is request "continue"/"ทำต่อ"?   │
├── YES → Read memory, resume task   │
└── NO → Continue analysis           │
      │
      ▼
┌─────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 3. Calculate Confidence Score       │
└─────────────────────────────────────┘
      │
      ├── Score >= 80 (HIGH)
      │   └─→ Select agent based on intent
      │       └─→ Execute directly
      │
      ├── Score 50-79 (MEDIUM)
      │   └─→ Route to Plan Agent
      │       └─→ Plan Agent analyzes & routes
      │
      └── Score < 50 (LOW)
          └─→ Ask clarifying question
              └─→ Wait for user response

📋 Clarification Patterns

When to Ask

When NOT to Ask

🎨 Skill Loading by Intent

Note: engineer-harness skill is ALWAYS loaded for proper output formatting and next-step suggestions.

💾 Memory Integration

Pre-Routing Memory Check

Before routing, ALWAYS:
1. Read .toh/memory/active.md
   - Current task context
   - In-progress work
   - Blockers
   
2. Read .toh/memory/summary.md
   - Project overview
   - Completed features
   - Tech stack used
   
3. Read .toh/memory/decisions.md
   - Past architectural decisions
   - Design choices
   - Naming conventions

Use memory to:
- Boost confidence (if request matches active work)
- Provide context (for ambiguous "it" references)
- Maintain consistency (follow established patterns)

Post-Execution Memory Save

After routing completes, ALWAYS:
1. Update .toh/memory/active.md
   - Mark completed items
   - Update current focus
   - Set next steps
   
2. Add to .toh/memory/decisions.md
   - If new decisions were made
   
3. Update .toh/memory/summary.md
   - If feature was completed

⚠️ NEVER finish without saving memory!

📌 Examples

Example 1: High Confidence → Direct

Request: "/toh สร้างหน้า dashboard"

Analysis:
- Keyword match: "สร้าง" + "หน้า" = Create UI (40 pts)
- Context clarity: "dashboard" = specific page (30 pts)
- Memory: Project has other pages (15 pts)
- Scope: Single page (10 pts)
Total: 95 pts = HIGH

Route: UI Agent (direct)

Example 2: Medium Confidence → Plan First

Request: "/toh build e-commerce"

Analysis:
- Keyword match: "build" = Create (40 pts)
- Context clarity: "e-commerce" = general concept (10 pts)
- Memory: New project (0 pts)
- Scope: Multiple features (0 pts)
Total: 50 pts = MEDIUM

Route: Plan Agent first → then execute plan

Example 3: Low Confidence → Ask

Request: "/toh fix it"

Analysis:
- Keyword match: "fix" (20 pts)
- Context clarity: "it" = unclear (0 pts)
- Memory: No recent bugs (0 pts)
- Scope: Unknown (0 pts)
Total: 20 pts = LOW

Action: Ask "What would you like me to fix? Please describe the issue."

⚠️ Critical Rules

1. Memory ALWAYS first - Never route without checking context
2. Confidence drives action - Trust the scoring system
3. Plan Agent is your friend - When in doubt, route to Plan
4. Survey, don't guess - Identity is declared; execution mode comes from orchestration-protocol's ladder
5. engineer-harness always loaded - Every response needs 3 sections + next steps

Smart Routing Skill v1.0.0 - Intelligent Request Routing Engine