smithery.ai

research-briefing

Build a focused literature and citation briefing from PapersFlow. Use when the user wants paper search, citation verification, related-paper discovery, or citation graph exploration.

Installation

$ npx skills add https://smithery.ai

Similar popular skills

Related neighbors and high-traction skills in the same topics — useful to compare before installing.

Also in this package

Other skills from smithery.ai · top by installs.

npx skills add https://smithery.ai

Browse all from smithery.ai

More details

Agent compatibility

Declared targets from SKILL.md / docs. Unmarked agents are not listed — the skill may still install via the CLI.

Claude Code Not declared
Cursor Not declared
Codex Not declared
GitHub Copilot Not declared
Windsurf Not declared
Gemini CLI Not declared
Cline Not declared
OpenCode Not declared

Package contents

Files included with this skill beyond the listing page.

  • skill md SKILL.md 2,841 B
  • docs SUMMARY.md 207 B

History

  1. First recorded snapshot · 0 installs

SKILL.md

Research Briefing

Use this skill when a user wants a high-signal research briefing grounded in the hosted papersflow-mcp server.

Workflow

  1. Resolve the user's target topic, title, DOI, or seed paper.
  2. Start with search_literature for broad discovery.
  3. Use verify_citation when the user gives a citation string, DOI, URL, PubMed ID, arXiv ID, or uncertain bibliographic reference.
  4. Use findrelatedpapers when the user wants nearby work around a seed paper.
  5. Use getcitationgraph when the user wants a graph view with references, incoming citations, and optionally similar papers.
  6. Use getpaperneighbors when the user wants a one-hop grouped view instead of a graph-first view.
  7. Use expandcitationgraph only after you already have seed node ids from a previous graph result.
  8. Use fetch when the user wants a richer single-paper record after search or graph exploration.

Output Style

  • Prefer short grouped sections over long prose.
  • Include paper titles, years, identifiers, and why they matter.
  • If the user asked for a graph-oriented answer, explicitly distinguish:

- references - later citations - similar papers

  • If the graph result looks noisy, say so instead of pretending the neighborhood is authoritative.

Tool Guidance

Use search_literature

Use for:

  • topic exploration
  • early-stage paper discovery
  • short lists of candidate seed papers

Use verify_citation

Use for:

  • checking a citation string
  • normalizing a DOI or paper URL
  • producing a reliable paper identifier before deeper exploration

Use getcitationgraph

Use for:

  • seed-centered graph exploration
  • showing how a paper connects to prior and later work

Prefer this when the user explicitly asks for a graph, network, map, or influence chain.

Use getpaperneighbors

Use for:

  • concise grouped neighbors
  • "show me the references / citations / similar papers" requests

Prefer this over the graph tool when the user cares more about grouped lists than graph structure.

Use expandcitationgraph

Use only when:

  • you already have valid node ids from a previous graph result
  • the user wants to grow the graph one hop farther

Do not guess node ids.

Examples

  • User asks: "Find five strong papers on retrieval-augmented generation evaluation and tell me which one to start with."
  • User asks: "Verify this citation and give me a normalized version."
  • User asks: "Show me the citation graph around Attention Is All You Need."
  • User asks: "Expand the graph from these two node ids and tell me where the important branches are."