smithery.ai

review-analyst-agent

Use this skill to analyze product reviews, find common issues, and prioritize improvements. "product reviews", "review sentiment", "find complaints", "customer complaints", "improvement recommendations", "voice of customer", "VOC analysis", "feedback analysis"

First seen Apr 27, 2026

Installation

$ npx skills add https://smithery.ai

Similar popular skills

Related neighbors and high-traction skills in the same topics — useful to compare before installing.

Also in this package

Other skills from smithery.ai · top by installs.

npx skills add https://smithery.ai

Browse all from smithery.ai

More details

Agent compatibility

Declared targets from SKILL.md / docs. Unmarked agents are not listed — the skill may still install via the CLI.

Claude Code Not declared
Cursor Not declared
Codex Not declared
GitHub Copilot Not declared
Windsurf Not declared
Gemini CLI Not declared
Cline Not declared
OpenCode Not declared

Package contents

Files included with this skill beyond the listing page.

  • skill md SKILL.md 10,233 B
  • docs SUMMARY.md 461 B

History

  1. First seen on skills.sh
  2. First recorded snapshot · 1 installs

SKILL.md

Review Analyst Agent

Analyze product reviews to find issues and prioritize improvements.

This skill uses 4 specialized agents that analyze reviews from different angles, then synthesizes into actionable recommendations.

What It Produces

Output Description
Sentiment Overview Overall sentiment breakdown (positive/neutral/negative)
Top Complaints Prioritized list of issues by frequency and severity
Top Praise What customers love (to protect/emphasize)
Feature Requests What customers want that doesn't exist
Priority Matrix Critical/Important/Nice-to-have improvements
Action Plan Specific recommendations with expected impact

Prerequisites

  • Web access for scraping reviews
  • No API keys required

Workflow

Step 1: Identify Product and Sources (REQUIRED)

⚠️ DO NOT skip this step. Use interactive questioning — ask ONE question at a time.

Question Flow

⚠️ Use the AskUserQuestion tool for each question below. Do not just print questions in your response — use the tool to create interactive prompts with the options shown.

Q1: Product

"I'll analyze reviews for your product! First — what's the product?

(Product name or URL)"

Wait for response.

Q2: Sources

"Where should I look for reviews?

- Amazon
- App Store / Google Play
- G2 / Capterra
- Reddit
- All of the above
- Or specify"

Wait for response.

Q3: Context

"Is this your product or a competitor's?

(Helps frame the analysis)"

Wait for response.

Q4: Issues

"Any known issues you want me to validate or explore?

- Yes — describe them
- No — find all issues"

Wait for response.

Quick Reference

Question Determines
Product What to analyze
Sources Where to scrape reviews
Context Framing of recommendations
Issues Focus areas for analysis

Step 2: Collect Reviews

Use browser tools to scrape reviews from:

Source Type Platforms
E-commerce Amazon, Walmart, Target, Best Buy
Software G2, Capterra, TrustRadius, Product Hunt
Apps App Store, Google Play Store
General Trustpilot, BBB, Yelp
Social Reddit, Twitter/X, YouTube comments
Forums Product-specific communities

Collect for each review:

  • Rating (if available)
  • Date
  • Review text
  • Helpful votes (if available)

Step 3: Run Specialized Analysis Agents in Parallel

Deploy 4 agents, each analyzing from a different perspective:

Agent 1: Review Scraper

Focus: Find and collect reviews from multiple sources

Tasks:
- Navigate to review platforms
- Extract review text and ratings
- Collect metadata (date, helpful votes)
- Handle pagination
- De-duplicate reviews

Agent 2: Sentiment Analyzer

Focus: Analyze sentiment and emotional patterns

Analyze:
- Overall sentiment (positive/neutral/negative)
- Emotional intensity
- Frustration indicators
- Satisfaction indicators
- Sentiment trends over time

Agent 3: Issue Identifier

Focus: Categorize complaints and find patterns

Identify:
- Common complaint themes
- Frequency of each issue
- Severity indicators
- Specific quotes as evidence
- Root cause patterns

Agent 4: Improvement Recommender

Focus: Prioritize and recommend fixes

Recommend:
- Priority ranking of issues
- Specific improvement suggestions
- Expected impact of each fix
- Quick wins vs long-term investments
- Competitive gaps to address

Step 4: Synthesize into Analysis Report

Combine all agent outputs into a structured report:

{
  "product": {
    "name": "Product Name",
    "sources_analyzed": ["Amazon (342 reviews)", "Reddit (89 posts)", "G2 (56 reviews)"],
    "total_reviews": 487,
    "date_range": "Jan 2025 - Jan 2026",
    "analysis_date": "2026-01-04"
  },
  "sentiment": {
    "overall_score": 3.8,
    "breakdown": {
      "positive": 62,
      "neutral": 18,
      "negative": 20
    },
    "trend": "Improving (up from 3.5 six months ago)",
    "net_promoter_estimate": 32
  },
  "top_complaints": [
    {
      "rank": 1,
      "issue": "Battery drains too fast",
      "frequency": 47,
      "percentage": "23% of negative reviews",
      "severity": "High",
      "sample_quotes": [
        "Battery only lasts 2 hours, not the 8 advertised",
        "Have to charge it 3x per day",
        "Battery life is a dealbreaker"
      ],
      "root_cause": "Hardware limitation or software optimization needed",
      "recommendation": "Improve battery capacity or optimize power consumption",
      "expected_impact": "Could improve rating by 0.3-0.5 stars"
    },
    {
      "rank": 2,
      "issue": "App crashes frequently",
      "frequency": 32,
      "percentage": "16% of negative reviews",
      "severity": "High",
      "sample_quotes": [
        "App crashes every time I try to sync",
        "Lost all my data after app crashed"
      ],
      "root_cause": "Sync functionality stability",
      "recommendation": "Stability audit of mobile app, fix crash on sync",
      "expected_impact": "Could reduce 1-star reviews by 15%"
    }
  ],
  "top_praise": [
    {
      "feature": "Build quality",
      "frequency": 89,
      "percentage": "45% of positive reviews",
      "sample_quotes": [
        "Feels premium in hand",
        "Solid construction, very durable"
      ],
      "recommendation": "Emphasize in marketing, protect in future versions"
    }
  ],
  "feature_requests": [
    {
      "request": "Water resistance",
      "frequency": 23,
      "sample_quotes": [
        "Wish I could use it in the rain",
        "Would pay extra for waterproof version"
      ],
      "recommendation": "Consider for v2 or premium tier"
    }
  ],
  "competitor_mentions": [
    {
      "competitor": "Competitor X",
      "context": "Switching from",
      "frequency": 15,
      "sentiment": "Mixed - some prefer us, some prefer them"
    }
  ],
  "priority_matrix": {
    "critical": [
      {"issue": "Battery life", "reason": "Top complaint, high severity"},
      {"issue": "App crashes", "reason": "Causes data loss, drives 1-star reviews"}
    ],
    "important": [
      {"issue": "Water resistance", "reason": "Frequent request, competitive gap"}
    ],
    "nice_to_have": [
      {"issue": "Color options", "reason": "Low frequency, low impact"}
    ]
  },
  "action_plan": [
    {
      "priority": 1,
      "action": "Fix app crash on sync",
      "effort": "Medium",
      "impact": "High",
      "expected_outcome": "Reduce 1-star reviews by 15%"
    },
    {
      "priority": 2,
      "action": "Improve battery life or set realistic expectations",
      "effort": "High",
      "impact": "High",
      "expected_outcome": "Improve rating by 0.3-0.5 stars"
    },
    {
      "priority": 3,
      "action": "Add water resistance to roadmap for v2",
      "effort": "High",
      "impact": "Medium",
      "expected_outcome": "Address top feature request"
    }
  ]
}

Step 5: Deliver Actionable Insights

Delivery message:

"✅ Review analysis complete!

Product: [Name] Reviews Analyzed: [Count] from [Sources] Overall Sentiment: [Score] ([Positive]% positive)

Top 3 Issues (by frequency):

  1. 🔴 [Issue 1] - [X]% of complaints
  2. 🔴 [Issue 2] - [X]% of complaints
  3. 🟡 [Issue 3] - [X]% of complaints

What Customers Love: ✅ [Praised feature 1] ✅ [Praised feature 2]

Priority Action: → Fix [Top Issue] first - expected to improve rating by [X]

Want me to:

  • Deep dive on any issue?
  • Compare to competitor reviews?
  • Track changes over time?
  • Create improvement roadmap?"

Integration with Other Agents

review-analyst-agent
    ↓ "Battery is top complaint"
product-engineer-agent
    ↓ "Design better battery solution"
patent-lawyer-agent
    ↓ "Check if solution is patentable"
copywriter-agent
    ↓ "Update marketing to address concern"
Agent How It Uses Review Data
product-engineer-agent Inform what to fix/improve
competitive-intel-agent Compare to competitor reviews
market-researcher-agent Validate market needs
copywriter-agent Address concerns in marketing
pitch-deck-agent Show customer-centric improvements
media-utils Generate PDF report from analysis

Generate PDF Report

After completing the analysis, offer to generate a PDF:

"Would you like me to generate a PDF report of this review analysis?"

python3 ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/media-utils/scripts/report_to_pdf.py \
  --input review_analysis.md \
  --output review_analysis.pdf \
  --title "Customer Review Analysis" \
  --style business

Agents

Agent File Focus
Review Scraper review-scraper.md Find and collect reviews
Sentiment Analyzer sentiment-analyzer.md Analyze sentiment patterns
Issue Identifier issue-identifier.md Categorize complaints
Improvement Recommender improvement-recommender.md Prioritize and recommend

Example Prompts

Your product:

"Analyze reviews for our Bluetooth headphones on Amazon"

Competitor:

"What are people complaining about with Notion?"

Comparison:

"Compare reviews of our product vs Competitor X"

Feature focus:

"Find feature requests for our mobile app from App Store and Reddit"

Priority:

"What should we fix first based on customer feedback?"

Trend:

"How has sentiment changed over the last 6 months?"