smithery.ai

resume-aesthetics

Evaluate the visual aesthetics of a PDF resume and provide critical feedback on layout, typography, spacing, visual hierarchy, and overall design. Use when the user asks to review or critique a resume's visual appearance.

First seen Apr 20, 2026

Installation

$ npx skills add https://smithery.ai

Similar popular skills

Related neighbors and high-traction skills in the same topics — useful to compare before installing.

Also in this package

Other skills from smithery.ai · top by installs.

npx skills add https://smithery.ai

Browse all from smithery.ai

More details

Agent compatibility

Declared targets from SKILL.md / docs. Unmarked agents are not listed — the skill may still install via the CLI.

Claude Code Not declared
Cursor Not declared
Codex Not declared
GitHub Copilot Not declared
Windsurf Not declared
Gemini CLI Not declared
Cline Not declared
OpenCode Not declared

Package contents

Files included with this skill beyond the listing page.

  • skill md SKILL.md 2,685 B
  • docs SUMMARY.md 246 B

History

  1. First seen on skills.sh
  2. First recorded snapshot · 1 installs

SKILL.md

Resume Aesthetics Evaluator

Overview

This skill evaluates the visual aesthetics of PDF resumes, providing critical and actionable feedback to improve the document's professional appearance and readability.

How to Evaluate

When evaluating a resume PDF, analyze the following aspects:

1. Layout & Structure

  • Is there a clear visual hierarchy?
  • Are sections well-defined and easy to distinguish?
  • Is the page balanced (not too heavy on one side)?
  • Is there appropriate use of whitespace?
  • Does the content fit well on the page without feeling cramped or sparse?

2. Typography

  • Are fonts professional and readable?
  • Is font sizing consistent and appropriate (headers larger than body)?
  • Is there too much variety in fonts/weights (should limit to 2-3)?
  • Is line spacing comfortable for reading?
  • Are font colors appropriate (not too light, not distracting)?

3. Spacing & Alignment

  • Are margins consistent throughout?
  • Is spacing between sections uniform?
  • Is text properly aligned (left-aligned body text is best)?
  • Are bullet points indented consistently?
  • Is there enough breathing room between elements?

4. Visual Hierarchy

  • Can a reader quickly scan and find key information?
  • Are the most important elements (name, job titles) prominent?
  • Do section headers stand out appropriately?
  • Is there a logical flow from top to bottom?

5. Overall Impression

  • Does it look professional and polished?
  • Is it visually appealing without being distracting?
  • Would it make a good first impression?
  • Is it ATS-friendly (not too complex for parsing)?

Feedback Format

Provide feedback in this structure:

## Resume Aesthetics Evaluation

### Strengths
- [List 2-4 things done well]

### Issues to Address
1. **[Issue Category]**: [Specific problem]
   - Recommendation: [How to fix it]

2. **[Issue Category]**: [Specific problem]
   - Recommendation: [How to fix it]

### Priority Fixes
1. [Most impactful fix first]
2. [Second priority]
3. [Third priority]

### Overall Score: X/10
[Brief summary of overall impression]

Critical Mindset

Be critical and specific. Avoid generic praise. Focus on:

  • Concrete issues that can be fixed
  • Specific measurements or comparisons when possible
  • Industry best practices for resumes
  • Accessibility and readability concerns

Remember: A resume has 6-10 seconds to make an impression. Every visual element matters.