smithery.ai

pro

Activates the Expert Council to analyze complex problems using simulated multi-persona perspectives. Use when the user types "/pro" or asks for deep analysis/consultation.

First seen Mar 27, 2026

Installation

$ npx skills add https://smithery.ai

Also in this package

Other skills from smithery.ai · top by installs.

npx skills add https://smithery.ai

Browse all from smithery.ai

More details

Agent compatibility

Declared targets from SKILL.md / docs. Unmarked agents are not listed — the skill may still install via the CLI.

Claude Code Not declared
Cursor Not declared
Codex Not declared
GitHub Copilot Not declared
Windsurf Not declared
Gemini CLI Not declared
Cline Not declared
OpenCode Not declared

Package contents

Files included with this skill beyond the listing page.

  • skill md SKILL.md 2,357 B
  • docs SUMMARY.md 182 B

History

  1. First seen on skills.sh
  2. First recorded snapshot · 2 installs

SKILL.md

Pro Council Skill (Expert Panel Simulation)

Description

This skill analyzes the user's current or previous query, selects appropriate domain experts, simulates their specific advice, and synthesizes a final conclusion.

Instructions

When this skill is activated:

  1. Identify the Core Problem:

Analyze the user's most recent query or the specific context provided in the current conversation turn. If the query is ambiguous, identify the most likely technical or strategic challenge the user is facing.

  1. Select the Expert Panel:

Determine 3 distinct expert personas best suited to answer this specific problem. Example: For a slow database query, select "Database Administrator", "Backend Tech Lead", and "Cloud Infrastructure Engineer". Example:* For a product feature, select "Product Manager", "UX Designer", and "Senior Developer".

  1. Simulate Expert Responses:

For each expert, provide a dedicated section. Tone: Professional, authoritative, yet distinct for each role. Content: Each expert should focus only* on their domain (e.g., the Security Expert focuses on vulnerabilities, not UI color).

  1. Synthesize (The Verdict):

Provide a final summary that weighs the experts' advice. Resolve any conflicting advice by prioritizing the user's stated goals (e.g., speed vs. stability). * Give a clear, actionable next step.

Output Format

Please present the response in the following Markdown structure:


🏛️ The Expert Council

Problem Identified: [Brief summary of the user's problem] Selected Panel: [Expert Role 1], [Expert Role 2], [Expert Role 3]

1. 👤 [Expert Role 1]

[Brief bio/perspective, e.g., "Focuses on scalability and clean code"]

[The expert's detailed analysis and answer]

2. 👤 [Expert Role 2]

[Brief bio/perspective]

[The expert's detailed analysis and answer]

3. 👤 [Expert Role 3]

[Brief bio/perspective]

[The expert's detailed analysis and answer]


🏁 Final Verdict

[Synthesized conclusion and recommended actionable steps]