smithery.ai

prd-structure

When creating or reviewing Product Requirements Documents. Used by PM-AGENT.

First seen Apr 27, 2026

Installation

$ npx skills add https://smithery.ai

Similar popular skills

Related neighbors and high-traction skills in the same topics — useful to compare before installing.

Also in this package

Other skills from smithery.ai · top by installs.

npx skills add https://smithery.ai

Browse all from smithery.ai

More details

Agent compatibility

Declared targets from SKILL.md / docs. Unmarked agents are not listed — the skill may still install via the CLI.

Claude Code Not declared
Cursor Not declared
Codex Not declared
GitHub Copilot Not declared
Windsurf Not declared
Gemini CLI Not declared
Cline Not declared
OpenCode Not declared

Package contents

Files included with this skill beyond the listing page.

  • skill md SKILL.md 1,596 B
  • docs SUMMARY.md 97 B

History

  1. First seen on skills.sh
  2. First recorded snapshot · 1 installs

SKILL.md

When to Use

When creating or reviewing Product Requirements Documents. Used by PM-AGENT.

Patterns

PRD Essential Sections

1. Problem Statement

## Problem
- Current state: {how it works today}
- Pain points: {specific issues}
- Impact: {quantified cost/time/frustration}

2. Goals & Metrics

| Goal | Metric | Target |
|------|--------|--------|
| Reduce support tickets | Tickets/week | -30% |
| Improve conversion | Signup rate | +15% |

3. Scope (MoSCoW)

## MVP (Must Have)
- Feature A
- Feature B

## Should Have (P1)
- Feature C

## Could Have (P2)
- Feature D

## Won't Have (Out of Scope)
- Feature X (reason)

4. Requirements

## Functional Requirements
| ID | Requirement | Priority | AC |
|----|-------------|----------|-----|
| FR-01 | User can login | Must | Given/When/Then |

## Non-Functional Requirements
| ID | Category | Requirement | Target |
|----|----------|-------------|--------|
| NFR-01 | Performance | Response time | <200ms p95 |

Anti-Patterns

  • No measurable success criteria
  • Scope without prioritization
  • Requirements without acceptance criteria
  • Missing constraints/assumptions
  • No "out of scope" section

Verification Checklist

  • Problem quantified (not just described)
  • Success metrics are measurable
  • MoSCoW prioritization complete
  • All requirements have AC
  • Out of scope explicitly listed
  • Assumptions documented