smithery.ai

issue-writing

Use this skill when writing, reviewing, or discussing issue descriptions, acceptance criteria, or task breakdowns.

First seen Apr 13, 2026

Installation

$ npx skills add https://smithery.ai

Summary

  • Use this skill when writing, reviewing, or discussing issue descriptions, acceptance criteria, or task breakdowns.
  • Ensures consistent, high-quality issue structure that any developer or AI can pick up and execute.
  • Triggers when drafting issues, defining requirements, or when users ask "how should I write this issue?" or "what should the acceptance criteria be?

Similar popular skills

Related neighbors and high-traction skills in the same topics — useful to compare before installing.

Also in this package

Other skills from smithery.ai · top by installs.

npx skills add https://smithery.ai

Browse all from smithery.ai

More details

Agent compatibility

Declared targets from SKILL.md / docs. Unmarked agents are not listed — the skill may still install via the CLI.

Claude Code Not declared
Cursor Not declared
Codex Not declared
GitHub Copilot Not declared
Windsurf Not declared
Gemini CLI Not declared
Cline Not declared
OpenCode Not declared

Package contents

Files included with this skill beyond the listing page.

  • skill md SKILL.md 4,370 B
  • docs SUMMARY.md 384 B

History

  1. First seen on skills.sh
  2. First recorded snapshot · 6 installs

SKILL.md

Issue Writing Skill

This skill guides the creation of well-structured, actionable Linear issues that any developer or AI can pick up and execute independently.

When to Use

Apply this skill when:

  • Writing or drafting issue descriptions
  • Defining acceptance criteria for tasks
  • Breaking down features into sub-issues
  • Reviewing existing issues for clarity
  • Users ask how to document requirements

Issue Structure: Parent Feature Issues

## IMPORTANT: Linear Issue Discipline
[Standard discipline rules]

---

## Problem
[1-2 sentences: Why does this feature need to exist?]

## Solution
[1-2 sentences: What are we building to solve this?]

## High-Level Implementation
[Bullet points: Key technical decisions, patterns]

## Codebase Investigation Findings
[What patterns to follow, similar features, code locations]

## Out of Scope / Deferred
[Explicitly list what we're NOT doing]

Issue Structure: Sub-Issues / Tasks

## Objective
[1-2 sentences: What specific thing needs to be done?]

## Acceptance Criteria
- [ ] [Specific, testable criterion 1]
- [ ] [Specific, testable criterion 2]
- [ ] [Specific, testable criterion 3]

## Implementation Notes
- Relevant files: [paths]
- Patterns to follow: [reference]
- Dependencies: [other issues]

Writing Good Acceptance Criteria (SMART)

  • Specific: Clear about what exactly needs to happen
  • Measurable: Can objectively verify if it's done
  • Achievable: Within scope of this single issue
  • Relevant: Directly related to the objective
  • Testable: Can be validated by running/checking

Principles for Issue Writing

  1. Self-Contained Context - Everything needed to understand and execute
  2. What, Not How - Describe outcome, not implementation
  3. Appropriate Granularity - Not too big, not too small
  4. Link to Resources - Design, API docs, related issues
  5. State Assumptions - Make implicit expectations explicit

Anti-Patterns to Avoid

  • Vague objectives: "Improve the dashboard"
  • Missing acceptance criteria: Assuming it's obvious
  • Implementation prescription: Over-specifying the how
  • Hidden dependencies: Not mentioning blockers
  • Scope creep: Adding "nice to haves"

Mermaid Diagrams in Linear Issues

ALWAYS include Mermaid diagrams when applicable. Linear supports Mermaid diagrams natively in issue descriptions. Use them to visualize:

  • User flows and interaction sequences
  • Data flow and processing pipelines
  • State machines and lifecycle transitions
  • Component relationships and dependencies
  • API/service interaction patterns
  • Entity relationships and data models

Mermaid Syntax in Linear

Use standard markdown code fences with mermaid as the language identifier:

````markdown

flowchart TD
    A[Start] --> B[End]

````

Common Diagram Types

Type Use Case Syntax
flowchart TD Top-down user flows, process flows flowchart TD
flowchart LR Left-right horizontal flows flowchart LR
sequenceDiagram API calls, service interactions sequenceDiagram
stateDiagram-v2 State machines, status transitions stateDiagram-v2
erDiagram Database schemas, entity relationships erDiagram
classDiagram Class relationships, component structure classDiagram

When to Include Diagrams

Always include a diagram when:

  • Describing a multi-step process or user flow
  • Explaining how components interact
  • Documenting state transitions
  • Showing data flow between systems
  • Illustrating API call sequences
  • Mapping entity relationships

The diagram should appear in:

  • Parent issue "High-Level Implementation" section
  • Sub-issue descriptions when flow context is needed
  • Bug reports when showing expected vs actual flow
  • Any issue where visual clarity aids understanding

Remember: A good issue can be executed by anyone who reads it.