smithery.ai

human-skills-router

Routes a human-skills request to the right coaching skill (feedback, conflict, stakeholder alignment, meeting facilitation, decision making, resilience, self-development, inclusion, ethical technology).

First seen Apr 4, 2026

Installation

$ npx skills add https://smithery.ai

Summary

  • Routes a human-skills request to the right coaching skill (feedback, conflict, stakeholder alignment, meeting facilitation, decision making, resilience, self-development, inclusion, ethical technology).
  • Use when the user asks for “human skills”, communication help, difficult conversations, collaboration issues, growth coaching, stress, or responsible/ethical tech use.

Also in this package

Other skills from smithery.ai · top by installs.

npx skills add https://smithery.ai

Browse all from smithery.ai

More details

Agent compatibility

Declared targets from SKILL.md / docs. Unmarked agents are not listed — the skill may still install via the CLI.

Claude Code Not declared
Cursor Not declared
Codex Not declared
GitHub Copilot Not declared
Windsurf Not declared
Gemini CLI Not declared
Cline Not declared
OpenCode Not declared

Package contents

Files included with this skill beyond the listing page.

  • skill md SKILL.md 3,359 B
  • docs SUMMARY.md 401 B

History

  1. First seen on skills.sh
  2. First recorded snapshot · 1 installs

SKILL.md

Human Skills Router

Purpose

Ask minimal clarifying questions, select the right skill, and produce a useful first draft fast.

Available skills

  • [feedback-coaching](../feedback-coaching/)
  • [conflict-navigation](../conflict-navigation/)
  • [stakeholder-alignment](../stakeholder-alignment/)
  • [meeting-facilitation](../meeting-facilitation/)
  • [decision-making](../decision-making/)
  • [resilience-and-self-regulation](../resilience-and-self-regulation/)
  • [career-self-development](../career-self-development/)
  • [inclusive-collaboration](../inclusive-collaboration/)
  • [ethical-technology-use](../ethical-technology-use/)

Intake (ask max 3 questions)

  1. Who is involved and what is the relationship? (peer, student, manager, client, team)
  2. What outcome do you want after this? (decision, alignment, behavior change, repair, boundary, plan, reduce stress)
  3. What constraint matters most? (time pressure, tension level, written vs live, formal vs informal, privacy/compliance)

If the user already provided enough context, skip questions and proceed.

Routing rules

  • If the user mentions feedback, performance, review, “how do I say this”, “address behavior” → use feedback-coaching.
  • If there is tension, blame, disagreement, frustration, escalation risk, “difficult conversation” → use conflict-navigation.
  • If it’s expectations, scope creep, requirements, stakeholder updates, negotiating constraints → use stakeholder-alignment.
  • If it’s a group setting: meeting/workshop/retro, stuck team, need agenda/decision process → use meeting-facilitation.
  • If it’s choosing between options, prioritization, trade-offs, uncertainty, ownership → use decision-making.
  • If the user is overwhelmed, stuck, stressed, anxious, needs boundaries or recovery → use resilience-and-self-regulation.
  • If the user asks about growth, learning plan, portfolio evidence, strengths/weaknesses, performance prep → use career-self-development.
  • If voices are missing, meeting dominance, inclusion, psychological safety, bias-aware collaboration → use inclusive-collaboration.
  • If the question involves privacy, sensitive data, consent, transparency, bias, IP, analytics, AI/tooling risk → use ethical-technology-use.

Output contract (always deliver something)

Return:

  1. Recommended skill (by name) + one-line reason.
  2. First usable artifact (message draft / conversation script / agenda / decision record / 30-minute plan), using the target skill’s output defaults.

Defaults

  • Provide two tones when drafting messages: (A) direct, (B) warmer.
  • Keep it concrete: observable facts, explicit request, clear next step.
  • Use the smallest effective intervention: fewer steps, less jargon.

Guardrails

Do not invent policies, agreements, or facts. If HR/legal/compliance risk is high, keep language factual and recommend consulting the right channel.