Developing

Execute implementation plans through coordinated subagent dispatch with code review and verification checkpoints.

When to Activate

• Implementation plan is approved
• User says "start implementing", "build it", "execute the plan"
• Ready to write code after planning phase
• Resuming development from previous session

Process

1. Session Startup Protocol

Check for existing progress:

1. Look for claude-progress.json
2. If exists: Review state, identify next task
3. If new: Initialize progress tracking
4. Run quick smoke test on existing code
5. Load relevant context from completed tasks

2. Load the Plan

Retrieve or confirm the implementation plan:

• List all tasks with dependencies
• Identify current task to execute
• Check for blockers from previous sessions

3. Select Appropriate Agent

Match task type to specialized agent:

4. Execute Task Loop

For each task:

1. Update progress: Mark task IN_PROGRESS
2. Spawn task agent with context
3. Agent implements task
4. Run verification gate
5. Code review checkpoint
6. If passes: Mark COMPLETE, update progress
7. If fails: Route to debugging or fix
8. Proceed to next task

5. Progress Tracking

Maintain claude-progress.json:

{
  "feature": "feature-name",
  "plan_file": "path/to/plan.md",
  "status": "in_progress",
  "current_task": 3,
  "tasks": [
    {"id": 1, "status": "complete", "agent": "backend-developer", "commit": "abc123"},
    {"id": 2, "status": "complete", "agent": "database-administrator", "commit": "def456"},
    {"id": 3, "status": "in_progress", "agent": "frontend-developer"},
    {"id": 4, "status": "pending"}
  ],
  "blockers": [],
  "last_session": {
    "ended": "2025-01-11T15:30:00Z",
    "notes": "Task 3 in progress, auth context from task 1 needed"
  }
}

6. Code Review Checkpoint

After each task:

1. Spawn code-reviewer agent on modified files
2. Check for issues: Security, quality, patterns
3. Run verification commands from plan
4. Decision point:

- APPROVED → Mark complete, proceed - CHANGES_NEEDED → Fix issues, re-review

Agent Dispatch Template

You are implementing Task [N] of [Total] for [Feature].

## Task
[Description from plan]

## Prior Work
Tasks 1-[N-1] are complete. Key outcomes:
- [Relevant files created/modified]
- [Important context from completed tasks]

## Your Deliverables
1. [Specific output 1]
2. [Specific output 2]

## Files
- Create: [new files]
- Modify: [existing files]

## Patterns to Follow
- Reference: [path/to/similar/code]
- Convention: [specific patterns]

## Verification (MUST pass before complete)
- [ ] [Verification command 1]
- [ ] [Verification command 2]

## Constraints
- Do NOT modify: [protected files]
- Do NOT: [specific restrictions]

Report BLOCKED if you encounter issues requiring human decision.

Code Review Template

Review changes for Task [N]:

## Changed Files
[git diff --name-only output]

## Review Focus
- [ ] No hardcoded secrets or credentials
- [ ] Error handling covers edge cases
- [ ] Follows existing code patterns
- [ ] Test coverage adequate
- [ ] No obvious performance issues
- [ ] Documentation updated if needed

## Questions
1. Does this match the task requirements?
2. Are there any security concerns?
3. Is the code maintainable?

Respond: APPROVED | CHANGES_NEEDED: [specific issues]

Handling Issues

If verification fails:

1. Check if it's a quick fix (< 5 min)
2. If quick: Fix inline and re-verify
3. If complex: Invoke debugging skill

If blocked:

1. Document the blocker clearly
2. Note what information is needed
3. Mark task as BLOCKED in progress
4. Ask user for guidance

If scope creep detected:

1. Note the new requirement
2. Do NOT implement it in current task
3. Suggest adding to plan as new task

Commit Conventions

After each task completion:

git add [changed files]
git commit -m "feat([feature]): [task description]

Task [N]/[Total] of [Feature] implementation.
- [Change 1]
- [Change 2]

Co-Authored-By: Claude <[email protected]>"

Collaboration

• If issues arise → Invoke debugging skill
• After all tasks complete → Invoke verifying skill
• If requirements change → Return to brainstorming
• If plan needs revision → Return to planning