Curriculum Reviewer Skill

This skill comprehensively reviews educational materials for quality, pedagogical soundness, and consistency.

When to Use

Use this skill when the user:

• Asks to review curriculum or lesson materials
• Wants quality assurance on educational content
• Requests feedback on teaching materials
• Needs consistency check across multiple lessons
• Wants to audit materials before publishing
• Asks for improvement recommendations

What This Skill Does

1. Identifies Scope of review:

- Entire curriculum - Specific class or lesson - Specific material type (lessons, slides, assessments) - Particular aspects (pedagogy, formatting, alignment)

1. Invokes Multiple Subagents for comprehensive review:

lesson-planner subagent reviews: - Learning objectives alignment - Pedagogical soundness - Timing and pacing realism - Differentiation strategies - Hands-on activity quality - Assessment alignment with objectives

slide-designer subagent reviews: - Slide clarity and visual design - One-idea-per-slide principle - Formatting consistency - Engagement elements - Presenter notes quality

assessment-builder subagent reviews: - Rubric clarity and fairness - Criteria alignment with objectives - Performance level descriptions - Example quality and usefulness - Student-friendly language

github-stylist subagent reviews: - Markdown formatting consistency - Professional appearance - Navigation and linking - README completeness - Overall polish

1. Creates Comprehensive Review Report with:

- Strengths Identified: What's working well - Areas for Improvement: Specific issues found - Recommendations: Concrete suggestions for fixes - Priority Levels: Critical vs. nice-to-have improvements - Consistency Issues: Patterns across materials - Alignment Check: Objectives → content → assessment

1. Offers Action Plan:

- Prioritized list of improvements - Option to apply automated fixes - Suggestions for manual edits

Review Criteria

Pedagogical Quality:

• Clear, measurable learning objectives
• Age-appropriate content and examples
• Effective differentiation strategies
• Authentic, hands-on activities
• Aligned assessments

Content Quality:

• Accurate information
• Relevant, current examples
• Clear explanations
• Logical progression
• Complete materials

Consistency:

• Formatting uniformity
• Style consistency
• Voice and tone
• Terminology usage
• Visual presentation

Usability:

• Ready-to-teach materials
• Clear instructions
• Appropriate timing
• Necessary resources listed
• Student-facing clarity

Output Structure

Review reports include:

• Executive Summary: Overview of findings
• Detailed Findings by category
• Specific Examples of issues
• Recommendations with priority
• Consistency Analysis across materials
• Action Items checklist

Example Usage

User: "Review all the Class 1 materials and make sure everything is high quality"

This skill will conduct a comprehensive review and provide detailed feedback with recommendations.