smithery.ai

coverage

>- Analyze test coverage gaps. Use when user says "test coverage", "what's not tested", "coverage gaps", "missing tests", "coverage report", or "what needs testing".

First seen Mar 20, 2026

Installation

$ npx skills add https://smithery.ai

Similar popular skills

Related neighbors and high-traction skills in the same topics — useful to compare before installing.

Also in this package

Other skills from smithery.ai · top by installs.

npx skills add https://smithery.ai

Browse all from smithery.ai

More details

Agent compatibility

Declared targets from SKILL.md / docs. Unmarked agents are not listed — the skill may still install via the CLI.

Claude Code Not declared
Cursor Not declared
Codex Not declared
GitHub Copilot Not declared
Windsurf Not declared
Gemini CLI Not declared
Cline Not declared
OpenCode Not declared

Package contents

Files included with this skill beyond the listing page.

  • skill md SKILL.md 2,715 B
  • docs SUMMARY.md 178 B

History

  1. First seen on skills.sh
  2. First recorded snapshot · 8 installs

SKILL.md

Analyze Test Coverage Gaps

Map all testable surfaces in the application and identify what's tested vs. what's missing.

Steps

1. Map Application Surface

Use the Explore subagent to catalog:

Routes/Pages:

  • Scan route definitions (Next.js app/, React Router config, Vue Router, etc.)
  • List all user-facing pages with their paths

Components:

  • Identify interactive components (forms, modals, dropdowns, tables)
  • Note components with complex state logic

API Endpoints:

  • Scan API route files or backend controllers
  • List all endpoints with their methods

User Flows:

  • Identify critical paths: auth, checkout, onboarding, core features
  • Map multi-step workflows

2. Map Existing Tests

Scan all .spec.ts / .spec.js files:

  • Extract which pages/routes are covered (by page.goto() calls)
  • Extract which components are tested (by locator usage)
  • Extract which API endpoints are mocked or hit
  • Count tests per area

3. Generate Coverage Matrix

## Coverage Matrix

| Area | Route | Tests | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Auth | /login | 5 | ✅ Covered |
| Auth | /register | 0 | ❌ Missing |
| Auth | /forgot-password | 0 | ❌ Missing |
| Dashboard | /dashboard | 3 | ⚠️ Partial (no error states) |
| Settings | /settings | 0 | ❌ Missing |
| Checkout | /checkout | 8 | ✅ Covered |

4. Prioritize Gaps

Rank uncovered areas by business impact:

  1. Critical — auth, payment, core features → test first
  2. High — user-facing CRUD, search, navigation
  3. Medium — settings, preferences, edge cases
  4. Low — static pages, about, terms

5. Suggest Test Plan

For each gap, recommend:

  • Number of tests needed
  • Which template from templates/ to use
  • Estimated effort (quick/medium/complex)
## Recommended Test Plan

### Priority 1: Critical
1. /register (4 tests) — use auth/registration template — quick
2. /forgot-password (3 tests) — use auth/password-reset template — quick

### Priority 2: High
3. /settings (4 tests) — use settings/ templates — medium
4. Dashboard error states (2 tests) — use dashboard/data-loading template — quick

6. Auto-Generate (Optional)

Ask user: "Generate tests for the top N gaps? [Yes/No/Pick specific]"

If yes, invoke /pw:generate for each gap with the recommended template.

Output

  • Coverage matrix (table format)
  • Coverage percentage estimate
  • Prioritized gap list with effort estimates
  • Option to auto-generate missing tests