smithery.ai

comment-mode

Granular feedback on drafts without rewriting.

First seen Mar 24, 2026

Installation

$ npx skills add https://smithery.ai

Summary

  • Granular feedback on drafts without rewriting.
  • Generates highlighted HTML with click-to-reveal inline comments.
  • Use when user says "comment on this", "leave comments on", "give feedback on", or asks for feedback on a draft.
  • Supports multiple lenses—editor feedback, POV simulation ("as brian would react"), or focused angles ("word choice only", "weak arguments").
  • A granular alternative to rewrites that lets users review feedback incrementally without losing their voice.

Similar popular skills

Related neighbors and high-traction skills in the same topics — useful to compare before installing.

Also in this package

Other skills from smithery.ai · top by installs.

npx skills add https://smithery.ai

Browse all from smithery.ai

More details

Agent compatibility

Declared targets from SKILL.md / docs. Unmarked agents are not listed — the skill may still install via the CLI.

Claude Code Not declared
Cursor Not declared
Codex Not declared
GitHub Copilot Not declared
Windsurf Not declared
Gemini CLI Not declared
Cline Not declared
OpenCode Not declared

Package contents

Files included with this skill beyond the listing page.

  • skill md SKILL.md 6,850 B
  • docs SUMMARY.md 495 B

History

  1. First seen on skills.sh
  2. First recorded snapshot · 2 installs

SKILL.md

Comment Mode

Generate highlighted HTML with click-to-reveal comments for granular feedback on text. Alternative to rewrites—user keeps their voice, reviews feedback incrementally.

When to Use

  • User says: "comment on this", "leave comments on", "give feedback on"
  • User pastes text and asks for feedback/critique
  • User wants targeted feedback without a full rewrite

Clarify Before Commenting

Use AskUserQuestion to clarify scope when the request is ambiguous. Avoid over-commenting (overwhelming) or under-commenting (missing the point).

Clarify when:

  • No lens specified → ask what angle they want
  • Long document → ask if they want full coverage or just key sections
  • Unclear audience → ask who the recipient is (affects POV comments)

Skip clarification when:

  • Lens is explicit ("comment on word choice only")
  • Document is short (<500 words)
  • Context is obvious from conversation

Example clarification:

User: "comment on this"
[long doc, no lens specified]

→ Use AskUserQuestion:
  "What should I focus on?"
  Options:
  - "Editor feedback (structure, clarity, word choice)"
  - "Recipient POV (how [person] would react)"
  - "Specific angle (tell me what)"

Lenses

Lens Color Comment style
Editor Yellow (#fff3cd) observations, suggestions: "weak opener", "add proof here"
POV (as person) Blue (#e3f2fd) reactions from that person's perspective: "i know this already", "legal would freak out"
Focused Yellow specific angle only: "word choice", "tone", "weak arguments"

Comment Style

  • Always lowercase
  • Short (5-15 words)
  • Smart about type: observations when noting, suggestions when alternatives help, reactions when simulating POV
  • Only comment where there's something worth saying—sparse beats exhaustive

Output Rules

DO:

  • Write to _private/views/{name}-comments-temp.html
  • Open with open _private/views/{name}-comments-temp.html
  • Use highlight colors matching the lens
  • Keep comments sparse and high-signal

DO NOT:

  • Comment on everything—only where there's an obvious edit or insight
  • Over-explain in comments—keep them punchy
  • Mix lenses in one output—pick one and stick to it

Template

<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
  <meta charset="UTF-8">
  <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0">
  <title>{title}</title>
  <style>
    * { box-sizing: border-box; }
    body {
      font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, 'Segoe UI', Roboto, sans-serif;
      max-width: 700px;
      margin: 0 auto;
      padding: 40px 20px;
      line-height: 1.7;
      color: #1a1a1a;
      background: #fafafa;
    }
    h1, h2, h3 { margin-top: 2em; font-weight: 600; }
    h1 { font-size: 1.4em; }
    h2 { font-size: 1.2em; color: #333; }
    p { margin: 1em 0; }

    .highlight {
      background: {highlight-bg};  /* #fff3cd yellow for editor, #e3f2fd blue for POV */
      padding: 1px 4px;
      border-radius: 3px;
      cursor: pointer;
      border-bottom: 2px solid {highlight-border};  /* #ffc107 for editor, #2196f3 for POV */
      transition: background 0.15s;
    }
    .highlight:hover, .highlight.active {
      background: {highlight-hover};  /* #ffe69c for editor, #bbdefb for POV */
    }

    .comment {
      display: none;
      background: {comment-bg};  /* #1a1a1a for editor, #0052cc for POV */
      color: #fff;
      padding: 8px 12px;
      border-radius: 6px;
      font-size: 0.85em;
      margin: 8px 0;
      line-height: 1.5;
    }
    .comment.show { display: block; }

    .section-break {
      border: none;
      border-top: 1px solid #ddd;
      margin: 2em 0;
    }

    .legend {
      position: fixed;
      bottom: 20px;
      right: 20px;
      background: #fff;
      padding: 12px 16px;
      border-radius: 8px;
      box-shadow: 0 2px 12px rgba(0,0,0,0.1);
      font-size: 0.8em;
      color: #666;
    }
  </style>
</head>
<body>

{content with <span class="highlight" data-comment="comment text">highlighted phrase</span>}

<div class="legend">{count} comments · click highlights to reveal</div>

<script>
document.querySelectorAll('.highlight').forEach(el => {
  const commentText = el.getAttribute('data-comment');
  const commentDiv = document.createElement('div');
  commentDiv.className = 'comment';
  commentDiv.textContent = commentText;
  el.insertAdjacentElement('afterend', commentDiv);

  el.addEventListener('click', () => {
    const wasActive = el.classList.contains('active');
    document.querySelectorAll('.highlight').forEach(h => h.classList.remove('active'));
    document.querySelectorAll('.comment').forEach(c => c.classList.remove('show'));
    if (!wasActive) {
      el.classList.add('active');
      commentDiv.classList.add('show');
    }
  });
});
</script>
</body>
</html>

Color Reference

Editor lens (yellow):

.highlight { background: #fff3cd; border-bottom: 2px solid #ffc107; }
.highlight:hover, .highlight.active { background: #ffe69c; }
.comment { background: #1a1a1a; }

POV lens (blue):

.highlight { background: #e3f2fd; border-bottom: 2px solid #2196f3; }
.highlight:hover, .highlight.active { background: #bbdefb; }
.comment { background: #0052cc; }

Workflow

  1. User pastes text + asks for comments
  2. If ambiguous: Use AskUserQuestion to clarify lens/scope
  3. Read text, identify key phrases worth commenting on (sparse, high-signal)
  4. Generate HTML with highlights and data-comment attributes
  5. Write to _private/views/{name}-comments-temp.html
  6. Run open _private/views/{name}-comments-temp.html

Examples

Editor lens:

User: "comment on this, focus on word choice"
→ Yellow highlights, suggestions like "vague, try 'specifically'" or "jargon, simplify"

POV lens:

User: "comment on this as brian would react"
→ Blue highlights, reactions like "i already know this" or "legal would push back here"

Focused lens:

User: "leave comments on this, only flag weak arguments"
→ Yellow highlights on weak claims, comments like "needs evidence" or "assumes too much"

Sparse/sharp lens:

User: "comment only where there's an obvious fix"
→ Minimal highlights, only typos, missing words, or clear improvements