smithery.ai

code-auditing

Systematic methodology for comprehensive codebase analysis — security review, technical debt identification, dead code detection, code quality checks, and best-practices verification against official library documentation.

First seen Mar 26, 2026

Installation

$ npx skills add https://smithery.ai

Similar popular skills

Related neighbors and high-traction skills in the same topics — useful to compare before installing.

Also in this package

Other skills from smithery.ai · top by installs.

npx skills add https://smithery.ai

Browse all from smithery.ai

More details

Agent compatibility

Declared targets from SKILL.md / docs. Unmarked agents are not listed — the skill may still install via the CLI.

Claude Code Not declared
Cursor Not declared
Codex Not declared
GitHub Copilot Not declared
Windsurf Not declared
Gemini CLI Not declared
Cline Not declared
OpenCode Not declared

Skill metadata

Parsed from SKILL.md frontmatter.

Allowed toolsRead, Grep, Glob, Bash, WebSearch, WebFetch

Package contents

Files included with this skill beyond the listing page.

  • skill md SKILL.md 4,839 B
  • docs SUMMARY.md 239 B

History

  1. First seen on skills.sh
  2. First recorded snapshot · 15 installs

SKILL.md

Code Auditing Skill

Comprehensive methodology for systematic code quality audits.

When to Use

  • Comprehensive code quality audits
  • Security vulnerability assessments
  • Technical debt identification
  • Pre-release code reviews
  • Best practices verification
  • Library and dependency audits

Audit Phases

Phase 0: Pre-Analysis Setup

  1. Check for project configuration files (package.json, tsconfig.json, etc.)
  2. Identify tech stack and main libraries
  3. Check for linting/formatting configs
  4. Run existing linting/testing commands as baseline
  5. Load documentation for identified core libraries

Phase 1: Discovery

  1. Find all code files by type
  2. Create tracking list for each file
  3. Group files by module/feature for contextual analysis

Phase 2: File-by-File Analysis

For each file, analyze for:

  • Dead code (unused functions, variables, imports)
  • Code smells and anti-patterns
  • Custom implementations that could use established libraries
  • Security vulnerabilities
  • Performance issues
  • Outdated patterns or deprecated APIs
  • Missing error handling
  • Overly complex functions
  • Duplicate code

Phase 3: Best Practices Verification

For every library and framework:

  1. Retrieve official documentation
  2. Compare implementation against official patterns
  3. Identify deviations from recommendations
  4. Note outdated usage patterns
  5. Flag discouraged anti-patterns

Phase 4: Pattern Detection

Look for recurring issues:

  • Common anti-patterns across files
  • Duplicated logic that could be abstracted
  • Inconsistent coding styles
  • Missing error handling patterns

Phase 5: Library Recommendations

For custom implementations:

  1. Check if current libraries provide the functionality
  2. Search for mature ecosystem packages
  3. Verify library health (commits, issues, activity)
  4. Check compatibility with project setup

Phase 6: Comprehensive Report

Generate detailed report with:

  • Executive summary
  • Critical issues requiring immediate attention
  • File-by-file findings
  • Prioritized action plan
  • Effort estimates
  • Library recommendations

Issue Priority Levels

  • Critical - Security vulnerabilities, broken functionality
  • High Priority - Performance bottlenecks, unmaintainable code
  • Medium Priority - Code quality, best practices deviations
  • Low Priority - Style, minor improvements
  • Quick Wins - Less than 30 minutes to fix

Analysis Categories

Security

  • Hardcoded secrets
  • SQL injection risks
  • XSS vulnerabilities
  • Missing input validation
  • Exposed sensitive data

Performance

  • Inefficient algorithms
  • Blocking operations
  • Memory leaks
  • Missing caching opportunities
  • N+1 query patterns

TypeScript/Type Safety

  • Missing type annotations
  • Use of any type
  • Custom types duplicating official types
  • Missing @types packages

Async/Promise Issues

  • Missing await keywords
  • Unhandled promise rejections
  • Callback hell

Dead Code

  • Unused imports and exports
  • Unused functions, classes, and methods
  • Unused variables and types
  • Unreachable code blocks
  • Unused files (not imported anywhere)
  • Unused dependencies

Tools:

  • JavaScript/TypeScript: npx knip --reporter json
  • Python: deadcode . --dry

Important: Always verify tool findings before reporting. Check for:

  • Dynamic imports (import(variable))
  • Framework patterns (React components, decorators)
  • Re-exports for public API
  • Entry points (CLI scripts, serverless handlers)

Resources

See the reference documents for complete methodologies:

  • ${CLAUDESKILLDIR}/references/audit-methodology.md - Full 6-phase audit process with detailed checklists
  • ${CLAUDESKILLDIR}/references/dead-code-methodology.md - Dead code detection tools, verification, and cleanup workflows

Quick Reference

Before Starting

  • Read project configuration files
  • Identify tech stack and libraries
  • Run existing linters as baseline
  • Create file tracking list

During Audit

  • Mark files as in-progress
  • Analyze each category systematically
  • Note specific line numbers
  • Document before/after examples
  • Mark files as completed

After Audit

  • Categorize all findings by priority
  • Generate comprehensive report
  • Save report to project root
  • Provide brief console summary