smithery.ai

candidate-evaluation

Evaluate GitHub contributors for MLOps/engineering roles. Use when analyzing candidates, researching GitHub profiles, or updating CONTRIBUTORS.md with hiring assessments.

First seen Mar 28, 2026

Installation

$ npx skills add https://smithery.ai

Similar popular skills

Related neighbors and high-traction skills in the same topics — useful to compare before installing.

Also in this package

Other skills from smithery.ai · top by installs.

npx skills add https://smithery.ai

Browse all from smithery.ai

More details

Agent compatibility

Declared targets from SKILL.md / docs. Unmarked agents are not listed — the skill may still install via the CLI.

Claude Code Not declared
Cursor Not declared
Codex Not declared
GitHub Copilot Not declared
Windsurf Not declared
Gemini CLI Not declared
Cline Not declared
OpenCode Not declared

Skill metadata

Parsed from SKILL.md frontmatter.

Allowed toolsRead, Write, Edit, Grep, Bash(gh api:*), Bash(git:*)

Package contents

Files included with this skill beyond the listing page.

  • skill md SKILL.md 3,947 B
  • docs SUMMARY.md 198 B

History

  1. First seen on skills.sh
  2. First recorded snapshot · 1 installs

SKILL.md

Candidate Evaluation Skill

Evaluate GitHub contributors for engineering roles at Pollinations.

When to Use

  • User asks to evaluate a contributor or candidate
  • User wants to research GitHub profiles for hiring
  • User needs to update CONTRIBUTORS.md with candidate analysis
  • User mentions "hiring", "candidate", "MLOps", or "evaluate contributor"

Evaluation Criteria

Must-Have Skills (Weight: High)

  • Python: Primary language proficiency
  • DevOps: Docker, CI/CD, infrastructure
  • GPU/ML Deployment: Model serving, inference optimization

Nice-to-Have Skills (Weight: Medium)

  • Kubernetes, vLLM, TGI
  • Quantization (GGUF, ONNX)
  • CI/CD pipelines (GitHub Actions)

Work Style Indicators (Weight: Medium)

  • PR size preference (small, focused = good)
  • Response time to reviews
  • Documentation quality
  • Test coverage habits

Evaluation Process

  1. Gather Data via GitHub MCP or gh api:

```bash # Get user repos gh api users/{username}/repos --jq '.[].name'

# Search PRs in pollinations gh api search/issues -X GET -f q='repo:pollinations/pollinations author:{username}'

# Search code for MLOps keywords gh api search/code -X GET -f q='user:{username} docker OR kubernetes OR gpu OR vllm' ```

  1. Analyze Repositories for:

- ML/AI projects (ComfyUI, HuggingFace, PyTorch) - DevOps tooling (Docker, CI/CD, scripts) - API/backend experience - Star counts and activity

  1. Check Pollinations Contributions:

- Merged PRs (high signal) - Open issues/discussions - Project submissions

  1. Generate Profile with:

- Fit score (1-10) - Strengths (bullet points) - Weaknesses (bullet points) - Key repositories table - Hiring recommendation

Output Format

Use ASCII box art for visual appeal:

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│  FIT: X.X/10  │  GitHub: username  │  Repos: N  │  Focus: Area             │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

✅ STRENGTHS

  • Point 1
  • Point 2

❌ WEAKNESSES

  • Point 1
  • Point 2

📦 KEY REPOS

Repo Tech What It Does

🎯 VERDICT: Recommendation

Skills Matrix Format

╔═══════════════════╦════════╦════════╦════════╦═══════════════╗
║     CANDIDATE     ║ Python ║ GPU/ML ║ Docker ║   FIT SCORE   ║
╠═══════════════════╬════════╬════════╬════════╬═══════════════╣
║ username          ║ █████  ║ ███    ║ ████   ║     X.X/10    ║
╚═══════════════════╩════════╩════════╩════════╩═══════════════╝

Legend: █ = Skill Level (1-5)

Reference Files

  • AGENTS.md - Project guidelines and contributor attribution

Example Queries

  • "Evaluate @username for MLOps role"
  • "Research GitHub profile for {username}"
  • "Add {username} to CONTRIBUTORS.md"
  • "Compare candidates X and Y"