smithery.ai

audit-content

Comprehensive content quality and maintenance assessment. Evaluates documentation quality, relevance, maintenance needs, and provides actionable recommendations.

First seen Mar 30, 2026

Installation

$ npx skills add https://smithery.ai

Similar popular skills

Related neighbors and high-traction skills in the same topics — useful to compare before installing.

Also in this package

Other skills from smithery.ai · top by installs.

npx skills add https://smithery.ai

Browse all from smithery.ai

More details

Agent compatibility

Declared targets from SKILL.md / docs. Unmarked agents are not listed — the skill may still install via the CLI.

Claude Code Not declared
Cursor Not declared
Codex Not declared
GitHub Copilot Not declared
Windsurf Not declared
Gemini CLI Not declared
Cline Not declared
OpenCode Not declared

Package contents

Files included with this skill beyond the listing page.

  • skill md SKILL.md 2,543 B
  • docs SUMMARY.md 182 B

History

  1. First seen on skills.sh
  2. First recorded snapshot · 1 installs

SKILL.md

Content Audit Skill

Perform a comprehensive quality and maintenance assessment of documentation or content. This skill evaluates content against quality standards, checks for freshness, identifies maintenance needs, and provides actionable recommendations.

Inputs

  • PATH - The directory or file path to audit (e.g., "/docs")
  • SEVERITY - (Optional) Minimum severity level to report: "low", "medium", "high" (default: "medium")
  • CATEGORY - (Optional) Categories to audit: "all", "quality", "relevance", "links", "metadata" (default: "all")
  • FIX_MODE - (Optional) Boolean, whether to suggest or apply automated fixes where possible (default: false)

Workflow

Step 1: Inventory & Freshness Check

Scan the target PATH to list all content assets.

  • Check "Last Modified" dates.
  • Identify outdated content (e.g., > 6 months old).
  • Verify author/owner metadata.

Step 2: Quality Assessment

Evaluate content against quality metrics:

  • Clarity & Readability: Is the content easy to understand? (e.g., plain language).
  • Completeness: Does it cover the topic sufficiently?
  • Accuracy: Are there broken links, deprecated terms, or incorrect instructions?
  • Structure: Does it follow standard templates and formatting?

Step 3: Issues & Recommendations

Generate a report of identified issues, categorized by severity:

  • High: Broken paths, critical misinformation, missing required sections.
  • Medium: Outdated styling, poor readability, minor inaccuracies.
  • Low: Typos, inconsistent formatting.

If FIX_MODE is enabled, generate or apply suggestions for fixes.

Required Outputs

A CONTENTAUDITREPORT in markdown format containing:

  • Summary: Total files, overall quality score, critical issues count.
  • Detailed Findings: Table of issues per file with severity.
  • Action Items: Prioritized list of recommended changes.
  • Freshness Report: List of stale or outdated documents.

Quick Reference

  • Purpose: Support content maintenance planning and quality improvement.
  • Key Metrics: Quality Score (0-100), Freshness (Age in days), Link Health (% valid).