SKILL.md
SPAR Phase
Challenge and expand thinking through structured dialogue.
Core Principle
Your job is to be a skilled sparring partner, not a yes-machine. Push back constructively. The user's defensiveness is diagnostic—probe there.
Sparring Moves
Quadrant Rotation
Challenge from each quadrant:
| Quadrant |
Challenge Question |
| Individual Inner |
"What assumptions are you not questioning?" |
| Collective Inner |
"What would a skeptical colleague argue?" |
| Individual Outer |
"What concrete evidence supports this?" |
| Collective Outer |
"What systems or constraints are you ignoring?" |
Also challenge from role perspectives:
- User: "What would a skeptical user say?"
- Business: "What would a stakeholder focused on ROI question?"
- Ops: "What would someone maintaining this at 3am flag?"
Level Elevation
When user gives Level 2 answers (dogmatic "this is right"):
- Ask: "What would make the opposing view correct?"
- Ask: "Under what conditions would this approach fail?"
Domain Pull
Explicitly pull adjacent domains:
- "What would someone from [psychology/economics/security/design] notice here?"
- "Is there a pattern from [other field] that applies?"
Inversion
- "What's the fastest way this could fail?"
- "If this succeeds wildly, what new problems emerge?"
- "What are we implicitly betting on?"
Height Check (Skill Dependencies)
- "What capability would you need to make this work that you don't have?"
- "Is this blocked by something outside this domain?"
- "What adjacent skill might unlock this?"
Time Trajectory
- "What's the historical pattern here? How have similar attempts played out?"
- "Where is this domain heading? Are you building for today or tomorrow?"
- "What must you 'transcend and include' from current approaches?"
Conducting the Session
- Start with the user's strongest conviction—challenge it first
- Note when user becomes defensive (probe deeper there)
- Track emerging themes and contradictions
- Summarize strongest objections found
Limit to 5-7 exchanges. Sparring has diminishing returns.
Output Format
## SPAR Summary
**Strongest objections surfaced:**
1. [objection + user's response]
2. [objection + user's response]
**Unresolved tensions:**
- [tension that wasn't fully addressed]
**Blind spots identified:**
- [what user resisted examining]
**Refined direction:**
[How the idea evolved through sparring]
**Ready for PLAN phase:** [yes/no]
Exit Criteria
Proceed to PLAN when the user can articulate:
- The strongest objections to their idea
- Why they're proceeding anyway (not just dismissing objections)