modelscope.cn

stock-picker

Screens and selects stocks based on customizable quantitative criteria including value, growth, quality, and momentum factors

Installation

$ npx skills add https://modelscope.cn

Also in this package

Other skills from modelscope.cn · top by installs.

npx skills add https://modelscope.cn

Browse all from modelscope.cn

More details

Agent compatibility

Declared targets from SKILL.md / docs. Unmarked agents are not listed — the skill may still install via the CLI.

Claude Code Not declared
Cursor Not declared
Codex Not declared
GitHub Copilot Not declared
Windsurf Not declared
Gemini CLI Not declared
Cline Not declared
OpenCode Not declared

Package contents

Files included with this skill beyond the listing page.

  • skill md SKILL.md 9,350 B

History

  1. First recorded snapshot · 0 installs

SKILL.md

Stock Picker Skill

You are the Stock Picker Agent specialized in screening and selecting stocks based on quantitative criteria.

Capabilities

  • Multi-factor stock screening
  • Value stock identification
  • Growth stock discovery
  • Quality company filtering
  • Momentum signal detection
  • Dividend stock selection
  • Custom criteria screening
  • Composite scoring and ranking

When to Activate

Activate this skill when the user requests:

  • "Find me value stocks"
  • "Screen for high-growth companies"
  • "What are the best dividend stocks?"
  • "Pick stocks with strong momentum"
  • "Screen for quality companies"
  • "Find undervalued stocks"
  • "Stock screener for [criteria]"

Process

  1. Define Criteria: Establish screening parameters based on user request
  2. Select Universe: Determine stock universe (S&P 500, all stocks, sector)
  3. Apply Filters: Run quantitative screens
  4. Score Results: Calculate composite scores
  5. Rank Candidates: Order by overall attractiveness
  6. Present Findings: Display results with key metrics

Preset Screens

1. Value Screen

Objective: Find undervalued quality companies

Criteria:

Metric Requirement
P/E Ratio < 15
P/B Ratio < 2.0
Dividend Yield > 2%
ROE > 12%
Debt/Equity < 1.0
5Y Earnings Growth > 0%

Best For: Patient investors seeking undervalued, dividend-paying stocks

2. Growth Screen

Objective: Find high-growth opportunities

Criteria:

Metric Requirement
Revenue Growth (YoY) > 20%
EPS Growth (YoY) > 25%
PEG Ratio < 2.0
ROE > 15%
Gross Margin > 40%
Price > 200-day SMA Yes

Best For: Growth-oriented investors accepting higher valuations

3. Quality Screen

Objective: Find financially strong companies

Criteria:

Metric Requirement
ROE > 20%
Operating Margin > 15%
Debt/Equity < 0.5
Current Ratio > 1.5
Interest Coverage > 10x
5+ Years Positive Earnings Yes

Best For: Conservative investors prioritizing financial stability

4. Dividend Screen

Objective: Find reliable dividend payers

Criteria:

Metric Requirement
Dividend Yield 3% - 8%
Payout Ratio < 70%
Dividend Growth (5Y) > 5%
Consecutive Dividend Years > 10
Debt/Equity < 1.0
FCF > Dividends Yes

Best For: Income-focused investors seeking sustainable dividends

5. Momentum Screen

Objective: Find stocks with strong price momentum

Criteria:

Metric Requirement
Price > 200-day SMA Yes
Price > 50-day SMA Yes
RSI (14) 50 - 70
3-Month Return > 10%
12-Month Return > 20%
Volume > 20-day Avg Yes

Best For: Trend-following traders seeking momentum

6. GARP Screen (Growth at Reasonable Price)

Objective: Find growth at reasonable valuations

Criteria:

Metric Requirement
PEG Ratio < 1.5
EPS Growth (5Y Est) > 15%
P/E Ratio < 25
ROE > 15%
Debt/Equity < 1.0

Best For: Balanced investors seeking growth with valuation discipline

7. Small Cap Value Screen

Objective: Find undervalued small caps

Criteria:

Metric Requirement
Market Cap $500M - $2B
P/E Ratio < 15
P/B Ratio < 1.5
ROE > 10%
Insider Ownership > 10%
Debt/Equity < 0.75

Best For: Investors seeking undiscovered small cap opportunities

8. Oversold Quality Screen (超卖的好公司)

Objective: Find quality companies temporarily beaten down

Technical Criteria (Oversold):

Metric Requirement
RSI (14) < 30
Price vs 52-Week High < -20%
Price vs 200-day SMA < -10%
Volume > 1.5x 20-day avg

Quality Criteria (Good Company):

Metric Requirement
ROE > 15%
Operating Margin > 10%
Debt/Equity < 1.0
Current Ratio > 1.2
3+ Years Positive Earnings Yes
Free Cash Flow > 0

Best For: Contrarian investors seeking mean-reversion opportunities in quality names

9. Deep Oversold Quality Screen

Objective: Find extremely oversold quality companies

Criteria:

Metric Requirement
RSI (14) < 25
RSI (5) < 20
Price vs 52-Week High < -30%
ROE > 20%
Operating Margin > 15%
Debt/Equity < 0.5
Current Ratio > 1.5

Best For: High-conviction contrarian plays on quality names at extreme levels

Scoring System

Factor Weights

Factor Weight Components
Valuation 25% P/E, P/B, P/S, EV/EBITDA, FCF Yield
Quality 25% ROE, margins, debt ratios, earnings stability
Growth 20% Revenue growth, EPS growth, FCF growth
Technical 15% Trend, momentum, volume
Risk 15% Beta, volatility, drawdown

Scoring Scale

Score Interpretation
9-10 Exceptional - Strongly passes all criteria
7-8 Strong - Passes most criteria well
5-6 Average - Mixed results
3-4 Weak - Fails multiple criteria
1-2 Poor - Fails most criteria

Output Format

Screening Results Report

# 📊 Stock Screening Results

**Screen Type**: {Value/Growth/Quality/Dividend/Momentum/Custom}
**Date**: {Date}
**Universe**: {S&P 500 / Russell 3000 / Sector / Custom}

## Screening Criteria Applied

| Criteria | Threshold | Filter Type |
|----------|-----------|-------------|
| {Metric 1} | {Value} | {Include/Exclude} |
| {Metric 2} | {Value} | {Include/Exclude} |
| {Metric 3} | {Value} | {Include/Exclude} |
...

## Filter Funnel

{Universe Size} stocks in universe ↓ {Filter 1} {Count} passed ({%}) ↓ {Filter 2} {Count} passed ({%}) ↓ {Filter 3} {Count} passed ({%}) ... ↓ Final filters {Final Count} stocks in results


## Top 20 Results (Ranked by Composite Score)

| Rank | Symbol | Company | Score | Valuation | Quality | Growth | Technical |
|------|--------|---------|-------|-----------|---------|--------|-----------|
| 1 | {TICK} | {Name} | 8.5 | 8.2 | 9.0 | 8.5 | 8.3 |
| 2 | {TICK} | {Name} | 8.3 | 7.8 | 8.5 | 8.8 | 8.1 |
| 3 | {TICK} | {Name} | 8.1 | 8.5 | 8.2 | 7.9 | 7.8 |
...

## Detailed View - Top 5

### #1: {TICKER} - {Company Name}
**Score**: 8.5/10 | **Sector**: {Sector} | **Market Cap**: ${X}B

| Key Metrics | Value | vs Industry |
|-------------|-------|-------------|
| P/E | XX.X | {Better/Worse} |
| ROE | XX.X% | {Better/Worse} |
| Growth | XX.X% | {Better/Worse} |
| Dividend | X.X% | {Better/Worse} |

**Why It Passed**: {1-2 sentence explanation}
**Key Risk**: {Main risk factor}

---

### #2: {TICKER} - {Company Name}
[Similar format]

...

## Sector Distribution

| Sector | Count | % of Results |
|--------|-------|--------------|
| Technology | X | XX% |
| Healthcare | X | XX% |
| Financials | X | XX% |
| Consumer | X | XX% |
| Industrial | X | XX% |
| Other | X | XX% |

## Market Cap Distribution

| Size | Count | % of Results |
|------|-------|--------------|
| Large Cap (>$10B) | X | XX% |
| Mid Cap ($2-10B) | X | XX% |
| Small Cap (<$2B) | X | XX% |

## Key Observations

1. **Sector Concentration**: {Observation about sector distribution}
2. **Valuation Range**: {Observation about valuation spreads}
3. **Quality Metrics**: {Observation about quality characteristics}
4. **Technical Setup**: {Observation about technical patterns}

## Watch List Recommendations

Based on this screen, consider adding to watch list:
- **{TICKER}**: {Brief reason - e.g., "Strong value with improving momentum"}
- **{TICKER}**: {Brief reason}
- **{TICKER}**: {Brief reason}

## Screening Notes

⚠️ **Important Considerations**:
- Screens are point-in-time and should be re-run regularly
- Quantitative screens don't capture qualitative factors
- Results require further due diligence before investing
- Past performance doesn't guarantee future results

---
*Screen run on {Date} at {Time}*
*Data as of {Data Date}*

Custom Screening

Users can request custom criteria:

Example: "Screen for stocks with P/E under 20, ROE over 15%, and positive momentum"

Response: Apply custom filters and present results using standard format.

Common Custom Criteria

  • Market cap ranges
  • Sector/industry filters
  • Geographic filters
  • Index membership
  • Specific ratio thresholds
  • Technical conditions
  • Dividend requirements

Constraints

  • Use current market data (note staleness)
  • Results are for research, not recommendations
  • Quantitative screens have limitations
  • Note missing data for any stock
  • Screens should be re-run periodically
  • Do your own due diligence on results