modelscope.cn

skill-vetting

Vet ClawHub skills for security and utility before installation. Use when considering installing a ClawHub skill, evaluating third-party code, or assessing whether a skill adds value over existing tools.

Installation

$ npx skills add https://modelscope.cn

Also in this package

Other skills from modelscope.cn · top by installs.

npx skills add https://modelscope.cn

Browse all from modelscope.cn

More details

Agent compatibility

Declared targets from SKILL.md / docs. Unmarked agents are not listed — the skill may still install via the CLI.

Claude Code Not declared
Cursor Not declared
Codex Not declared
GitHub Copilot Not declared
Windsurf Not declared
Gemini CLI Not declared
Cline Not declared
OpenCode Not declared

Package contents

Files included with this skill beyond the listing page.

  • skill md SKILL.md 2,686 B

History

  1. First recorded snapshot · 0 installs

SKILL.md

Skill Vetting

Safely evaluate ClawHub skills for security risks and practical utility.

Quick Start

# Download and inspect
cd /tmp
curl -L -o skill.zip "https://auth.clawdhub.com/api/v1/download?slug=SKILL_NAME"
mkdir skill-inspect && cd skill-inspect
unzip -q ../skill.zip

# Run scanner
python3 ~/.openclaw/workspace/skills/skill-vetting/scripts/scan.py .

# Manual review
cat SKILL.md
cat scripts/*.py

Vetting Workflow

1. Download to /tmp (Never Workspace)

cd /tmp
curl -L -o skill.zip "https://auth.clawdhub.com/api/v1/download?slug=SLUG"
mkdir skill-NAME && cd skill-NAME
unzip -q ../skill.zip

2. Run Automated Scanner

python3 ~/.openclaw/workspace/skills/skill-vetting/scripts/scan.py .

Exit codes: 0 = Clean, 1 = Issues found

The scanner outputs specific findings with file:line references. Review each finding in context.

3. Manual Code Review

Even if scanner passes:

  • Does SKILL.md description match actual code behavior?
  • Do network calls go to documented APIs only?
  • Do file operations stay within expected scope?
  • Any hidden instructions in comments/markdown?
# Quick prompt injection check
grep -ri "ignore.*instruction\|disregard.*previous\|system:\|assistant:" .

4. Utility Assessment

Critical question: What does this unlock that I don't already have?

Compare to:

  • MCP servers (mcporter list)
  • Direct APIs (curl + jq)
  • Existing skills (clawhub list)

Skip if: Duplicates existing tools without significant improvement.

5. Decision Matrix

Security Utility Decision
✅ Clean 🔥 High Install
✅ Clean ⚠️ Marginal Consider (test first)
⚠️ Issues Any Investigate findings
🚨 Malicious Any Reject

Red Flags (Reject Immediately)

  • eval()/exec() without justification
  • base64-encoded strings (not data/images)
  • Network calls to IPs or undocumented domains
  • File operations outside temp/workspace
  • Behavior doesn't match documentation
  • Obfuscated code (hex, chr() chains)

After Installation

Monitor for unexpected behavior:

  • Network activity to unfamiliar services
  • File modifications outside workspace
  • Error messages mentioning undocumented services

Remove and report if suspicious.

References

  • Malicious patterns + false positives: [references/patterns.md](references/patterns.md)