sidkh/skills · Archived

understand-diff

Run a short active-recall dialogue that helps the user understand their current unstaged code changes. Use when the user wants to understand, review, quiz themselves on, or explain a local diff before accepting, committing, merging, or shipping it.

First seen Aug 16, 2026

Installation

$ npx skills add sidkh/skills --skill understand-diff

Stronger alternatives

This repository is archived — consider an actively maintained alternative.

Similar popular skills

Related neighbors and high-traction skills in the same topics — useful to compare before installing.

Also in this package

Other skills from sidkh/skills.

npx skills add sidkh/skills

Browse all from sidkh/skills

More details

Agent compatibility

Declared targets from SKILL.md / docs. Unmarked agents are not listed — the skill may still install via the CLI.

Claude Code Not declared
Cursor Not declared
Codex Not declared
GitHub Copilot Not declared
Windsurf Not declared
Gemini CLI Not declared
Cline Not declared
OpenCode Not declared

Repository health

Stars 8
Default branch main
Open issues 0
Status Archived

Package contents

Files included with this skill beyond the listing page.

  • skill md SKILL.md 2,197 B
  • docs SUMMARY.md 271 B

History

  1. First seen on skills.sh
  2. First recorded snapshot · 1 installs

SKILL.md

Understand Diff

Help the user understand their current unstaged changes with the least friction possible. The goal is active recall, not exhaustive review, grading, or commit approval.

Workflow

  1. Inspect the unstaged diff with git diff.
  2. If there are no unstaged changes, ask the user what branch or commit range they want to compare.
  3. Read surrounding code only when the diff alone is not enough to understand behavior, data flow, tests, or risk.
  4. Identify the highest-leverage thing the user should be able to explain.
  5. Ask one open-ended question immediately.
  6. Wait for the user's answer.
  7. Give brief feedback, then either ask one useful follow-up or finish with a short summary.

Question Style

  • Ask the fewest questions that can produce real understanding.
  • Prefer behavior, intent, data flow, risk, and tests over line-by-line trivia.
  • Use open-ended prompts that require the user to explain in their own words.
  • Do not use multiple choice unless the user is stuck and needs scaffolding.
  • Do not announce a quiz plan, concept list, file count, or full diff summary before the first question.
  • Do not reveal the answer before the user has attempted an explanation.

Feedback

After each answer:

  • say what the user got right
  • point out the most important missing or incorrect part
  • ask a sharper follow-up only if it would materially improve understanding
  • give a small hint before giving a full explanation when the user is stuck

Completion

Finish as soon as the user has shown enough understanding of the main changed behavior, reason for the change, and relevant risk or test implication.

End with a concise summary of:

  • what the user demonstrated
  • any important unresolved risk
  • any useful verification step

Do not say the change is ready to commit. Say only what the user demonstrated about their understanding.